ABSTRACT
The proliferation of digital and mobile devices, including; smart phones and tablets has led policy makers and practitioners to include these ubiquitous technologies in the realms of education. A thorough review of the relevant literature suggests that both students as well as their course instructors are becoming increasingly acquainted with the adoption of education technologies in the higher educational context. Hence, this study explores the university students' readiness to engage with the virtual learning environment (VLE). The methodology has integrated measuring items that were drawn from the educational technology literature, including the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, to better understand the students' perceptions towards VLE. It investigated whether they were influenced by their instructors or by fellow students to use VLE. The results suggest that most of the research participants were using this technology as they believed that it supported them in their learning outcomes. The findings also revealed that the students were not coerced by their course instructors or by other individuals to engage with VLE. Moreover, the university's facilitating conditions had a significant effect on the participants' usage of VLE. In conclusion, this contribution puts forward key implications to practitioners. It also clarifies the limitations of this study and proposes future research directions.
- Camilleri, M. A. 2018. The SMEs' technology acceptance of digital media for stakeholder engagement. Journal of Small Bus. & Ent. Dev. 26, 4, 504--521.Google Scholar
- Henderson, M., Selwyn, N. and Aston, R. 2017. What works and why? Student perceptions of 'useful'digital technology in university teaching and learning. Stud. in Higher Educ. 42, 8, 1567--1579.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camilleri, M. A. 2018. The promotion of responsible tourism management through digital media. Tour. Planning. & Dev. 15, 6, 653--671.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Betts, L. R. and Spenser, K. A. 2017. People think it's a harmless joke": young people's understanding of the impact of technology, digital vulnerability and cyberbullying in the United Kingdom. Journal of Children & Med. 11, 1, 20--35.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Truong, H. M. 2016. Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Comp. in Human Behav. 55, 1185--1193.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Camilleri, A. C. and Camilleri, M. A. 2019. The Students Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations to Engage with Digital Learning Games. In Shun-Wing N.G., Fun, T.S. and Shi, Y. (Eds.) 5th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies (ICETT 2019), Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
- Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M. and Song, J. 2012. An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Comp. & Educ. 59, 3, 1054--1064.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Camilleri, A. C. and Camilleri, M. A. 2019. The students' perceived use, ease of use and enjoyment of educational Games at Home and at School. 13th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference. International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (INTED2019), Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
- Fabian, K., Topping, K. J. and Barron, I. G. 2018. Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Educ.Tech.Res. & Dev. 66, 5, 1119--1139.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2019. The Students' Readiness to Engage with Mobile Learning Apps. Interactive Tech. & Smart Educ. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ITSE-06-2019-0027/full/htmlGoogle Scholar
- Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2019. Student-Centred Learning through Serious Games. 13th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2019), Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
- Wolbring, T. and Treischl, E. 2016. Selection bias in students' evaluation of teaching. Res. in Higher Educ. 57, 1, 51--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jang, H., Kim, E. J. and Reeve, J. 2016. Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learng & Instr. 43, 27--38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fang, Z. 2014. Preparing content area teachers for disciplinary literacy instruction: The role of literacy teacher educators. Journal of Adol. & Adult Liter. 57, 6, 444--448.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2017. Digital learning resources and ubiquitous technologies in education. Tech. Know. & Learng, 22, 1, 65--82.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A. and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. 2017. Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educ. Tech. Res. & Dev. 65, 3, 555--575.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deng, L. and Tavares, N. J. 2013. From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities. Comp. & Educ. 68, 167--176.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C. and Wang, H.Y. 2009. Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. Brit. Journal of Educ. Tech. 40, 1, 92--118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, J., Yu, W. C. W. and Wu, E. 2013. Empowering Mobile Assisted Social E-Learning: Students' Expectations and Perceptions, World Journal of Educ. 3, 2, 59--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camilleri, A. C. and Camilleri, M. A. 2019. Mobile Learning via Educational Apps: An Interpretative Study. In Shun-Wing N. G., Fun, T. S. and Shi, Y. (Eds.) 5th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies (ICETT 2019). Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
- Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2017. The Technology Acceptance of Mobile Applications in Education. In Sánchez, I.A. and Isaias, P. (Eds) 13th International Conference on Mobile Learning, International Association for Development of the Information Society. IADIS Proceedings, 41--48, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
- Teo, T. and Zhou, M. 2014. Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Comp. in Higher Educ. 26, 2, 124--142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2017. Measuring the educators' behavioural intention, perceived use and ease of use of mobile technologies. In Wood, G. (Ed) Re-connecting management research with the disciplines: Shaping the research agenda for the social sciences, British Academy of Management Proceedings, University of Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
- So, S. 2016. Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Educ. 31, 32--42.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeong, H. I. and Kim, Y. 2017. The acceptance of computer technology by teachers in early childhood education. Interactive Learng Env. 25, 4, 496--512.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van Raaij, E. M. and Schepers, J. J., 2008. The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Comp. & Educ. 50, 3, 838--852.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jones, C. and Hosein, A., 2010. Profiling university students' use of technology: where is the NET generation divide? The Int. Journal of Tech. Know. & Soc. 6,3, 43--58.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Org. Behav. & Hum. Dec. Proc. 50, 2, 179--211.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27, 3, 425--478.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13,3, 319--340.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cheung, R. and Vogel, D. 2013. Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Comp. & Educ. 63, 160--175.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Teo, T. 2009. Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Comp. & Educ. 52, 2, 302--312.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., and Xu, X. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quart. 36, 1, 157--178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Teo, T. and Noyes, J. 2014. Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Interactive Learng Env. 22, 1, 51--66.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2017. The Students' Perceptions of Digital Game-Based Learning. In Pivec, M. and Grundler, J. (Ed.) 11th European Conference on Games Based Learning, ECGBL Proceedings, 52--62, H Joanneum University of Applied Science, Graz, Austria.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Students' Acceptance and USE of Their University's Virtual Learning Environment
Recommendations
The Acceptance and Use of Mobile Learning Applications in Higher Education
ICEEL '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Education and E-LearningMany individuals are increasingly using ubiquitous technologies, including interactive applications (apps) that are widely available on our mobile devices, including the smart phones and tablets. Therefore, in the last few years, educators and policy ...
Utilitarian and intrinsic motivations to use mobile learning technologies: An extended technology acceptance model
ICSLT '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on e-Society, e-Learning and e-TechnologiesStudents are increasingly utilizing mobile learning applications (m-learning apps) in various contexts. They can access their content from anywhere, anytime. This research explores the students’ perceptions about learning technologies in a higher ...
E-learning services acceptance in higher educational institutes: A case study in Brunei
This research studies on the e-learning services acceptance in higher education institutions in Brunei Darussalam. This research has seven hypotheses, relating to independent, intermediary, and dependent variables. The independent variables include ...
Comments