skip to main content
10.1145/3377571.3377574acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Students' Acceptance and USE of Their University's Virtual Learning Environment

Published:03 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of digital and mobile devices, including; smart phones and tablets has led policy makers and practitioners to include these ubiquitous technologies in the realms of education. A thorough review of the relevant literature suggests that both students as well as their course instructors are becoming increasingly acquainted with the adoption of education technologies in the higher educational context. Hence, this study explores the university students' readiness to engage with the virtual learning environment (VLE). The methodology has integrated measuring items that were drawn from the educational technology literature, including the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, to better understand the students' perceptions towards VLE. It investigated whether they were influenced by their instructors or by fellow students to use VLE. The results suggest that most of the research participants were using this technology as they believed that it supported them in their learning outcomes. The findings also revealed that the students were not coerced by their course instructors or by other individuals to engage with VLE. Moreover, the university's facilitating conditions had a significant effect on the participants' usage of VLE. In conclusion, this contribution puts forward key implications to practitioners. It also clarifies the limitations of this study and proposes future research directions.

References

  1. Camilleri, M. A. 2018. The SMEs' technology acceptance of digital media for stakeholder engagement. Journal of Small Bus. & Ent. Dev. 26, 4, 504--521.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Henderson, M., Selwyn, N. and Aston, R. 2017. What works and why? Student perceptions of 'useful'digital technology in university teaching and learning. Stud. in Higher Educ. 42, 8, 1567--1579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Camilleri, M. A. 2018. The promotion of responsible tourism management through digital media. Tour. Planning. & Dev. 15, 6, 653--671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Betts, L. R. and Spenser, K. A. 2017. People think it's a harmless joke": young people's understanding of the impact of technology, digital vulnerability and cyberbullying in the United Kingdom. Journal of Children & Med. 11, 1, 20--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Truong, H. M. 2016. Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Comp. in Human Behav. 55, 1185--1193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Camilleri, A. C. and Camilleri, M. A. 2019. The Students Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations to Engage with Digital Learning Games. In Shun-Wing N.G., Fun, T.S. and Shi, Y. (Eds.) 5th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies (ICETT 2019), Seoul, South Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M. and Song, J. 2012. An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Comp. & Educ. 59, 3, 1054--1064.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Camilleri, A. C. and Camilleri, M. A. 2019. The students' perceived use, ease of use and enjoyment of educational Games at Home and at School. 13th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference. International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (INTED2019), Valencia, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fabian, K., Topping, K. J. and Barron, I. G. 2018. Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Educ.Tech.Res. & Dev. 66, 5, 1119--1139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2019. The Students' Readiness to Engage with Mobile Learning Apps. Interactive Tech. & Smart Educ. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ITSE-06-2019-0027/full/htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2019. Student-Centred Learning through Serious Games. 13th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2019), Valencia, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wolbring, T. and Treischl, E. 2016. Selection bias in students' evaluation of teaching. Res. in Higher Educ. 57, 1, 51--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jang, H., Kim, E. J. and Reeve, J. 2016. Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learng & Instr. 43, 27--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Fang, Z. 2014. Preparing content area teachers for disciplinary literacy instruction: The role of literacy teacher educators. Journal of Adol. & Adult Liter. 57, 6, 444--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2017. Digital learning resources and ubiquitous technologies in education. Tech. Know. & Learng, 22, 1, 65--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A. and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. 2017. Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educ. Tech. Res. & Dev. 65, 3, 555--575.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Deng, L. and Tavares, N. J. 2013. From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities. Comp. & Educ. 68, 167--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C. and Wang, H.Y. 2009. Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. Brit. Journal of Educ. Tech. 40, 1, 92--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wang, J., Yu, W. C. W. and Wu, E. 2013. Empowering Mobile Assisted Social E-Learning: Students' Expectations and Perceptions, World Journal of Educ. 3, 2, 59--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Camilleri, A. C. and Camilleri, M. A. 2019. Mobile Learning via Educational Apps: An Interpretative Study. In Shun-Wing N. G., Fun, T. S. and Shi, Y. (Eds.) 5th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies (ICETT 2019). Seoul, South Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2017. The Technology Acceptance of Mobile Applications in Education. In Sánchez, I.A. and Isaias, P. (Eds) 13th International Conference on Mobile Learning, International Association for Development of the Information Society. IADIS Proceedings, 41--48, Budapest, Hungary.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Teo, T. and Zhou, M. 2014. Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Comp. in Higher Educ. 26, 2, 124--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2017. Measuring the educators' behavioural intention, perceived use and ease of use of mobile technologies. In Wood, G. (Ed) Re-connecting management research with the disciplines: Shaping the research agenda for the social sciences, British Academy of Management Proceedings, University of Warwick, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. So, S. 2016. Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Educ. 31, 32--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jeong, H. I. and Kim, Y. 2017. The acceptance of computer technology by teachers in early childhood education. Interactive Learng Env. 25, 4, 496--512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Van Raaij, E. M. and Schepers, J. J., 2008. The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Comp. & Educ. 50, 3, 838--852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jones, C. and Hosein, A., 2010. Profiling university students' use of technology: where is the NET generation divide? The Int. Journal of Tech. Know. & Soc. 6,3, 43--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Org. Behav. & Hum. Dec. Proc. 50, 2, 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27, 3, 425--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13,3, 319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Cheung, R. and Vogel, D. 2013. Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Comp. & Educ. 63, 160--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Teo, T. 2009. Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Comp. & Educ. 52, 2, 302--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., and Xu, X. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quart. 36, 1, 157--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Teo, T. and Noyes, J. 2014. Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Interactive Learng Env. 22, 1, 51--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Camilleri, M. A. and Camilleri, A. C. 2017. The Students' Perceptions of Digital Game-Based Learning. In Pivec, M. and Grundler, J. (Ed.) 11th European Conference on Games Based Learning, ECGBL Proceedings, 52--62, H Joanneum University of Applied Science, Graz, Austria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Students' Acceptance and USE of Their University's Virtual Learning Environment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IC4E '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning
      January 2020
      441 pages
      ISBN:9781450372947
      DOI:10.1145/3377571

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 May 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader