Fabio Giglietto
ABSTRACT
Despite widespread concern over the role played by disinformation during recent electoral processes, the intrinsic elusiveness of the subject hinders efforts aimed at estimating its prevalence and effect. While there has been proliferation of attempts to define, understand and fight the spread of problematic information in contemporary media ecosystems, most of these attempts focus on detecting false content and/or bad actors. For instance, several existing studies rely on lists of problematic content or news media sources compiled by fact-checkers. However, these lists may quickly become obsolete leading to unreliable estimates. Using media manipulation as a frame, along with a revised version of the “coordinated inauthentic behavior” original definition, in this paper, we argue for a wider ecological focus. Leveraging a method designed to detect “coordinated links sharing behavior” (CLSB), we introduce and assess an approach aimed at creating and keeping lists of potentially problematic sources updated by analyzing the URLs shared on Facebook by public groups, pages, and verified profiles. We show how CLSB is consistently associated with higher risks of encountering problematic news sources across three different datasets of news stories and can be thus used as a signal to support manual and automatic detection of problematic information.
- Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow, and Chuan Yu. 2019. Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics 6, 2 (April 2019), 2053168019848554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848554Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Marco Bastos and Johan Farkas. 2019. “Donald Trump Is My President!”: The Internet Research Agency Propaganda Machine. Social Media + Society 5, 3 (July 2019), 2056305119865466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119865466Google Scholar
- Marco Bastos and Dan Mercea. 2018. Parametrizing Brexit: mapping Twitter political space to parliamentary constituencies. Inf. Commun. Soc. 21, 7 (July 2018), 921–939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1433224Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marco Bastos and Dan Mercea. 2019. The Brexit Botnet and User-Generated Hyperpartisan News. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 37, 1 (February 2019), 38–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317734157Google Scholar
- Marco T. Bastos. 2019. This Account Doesn't Exist: Tweet Decay and the Politics of Deletion in the Brexit Debate. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3485789Google Scholar
- Yochai Benkler. 2019. Cautionary Notes on Disinformation and the Origins of Distrust. Retrieved from https://mediawell.ssrc.org/expert-reflections/cautionary-notes-on-disinformation-benkler/Google Scholar
- Alessandro Bessi and Emilio Ferrara. 2016. Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion. First Monday. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2982233Google Scholar
- Axel Bruns, Tim Highfield, and Jean Burgess. 2014. The Arab Spring and social media audiences: English and Arabic Twitter users and their networks. American behavioral scientist, 57(7), 871-898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479374Google Scholar
- Gabriella Coleman. 2015. Hacker, hoaxer, whistleblower, spy: The many faces of Anonymous. Verso books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Jessie Daniels. 2009. Cloaked websites: propaganda, cyber-racism and epistemology in the digital era. New Media & Society 11, 5 (August 2009), 659–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809105345Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jessie Daniels. 2014. From crisis pregnancy centers to teenbreaks. com: anti-abortion activism's use of cloaked websites. In Cyberactivism on the participatory web. Routledge, 152–166. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781315885797/chapters/10.4324/978131 5885797-12Google Scholar
- Joan Donovan and Brian Friedberg. 2019. Source hacking: Media manipulation in practice. Data&Society. Retrieved from https://datasociety. net/output/source-hacking-media-manipulation-in-practiceGoogle Scholar
- Johan Farkas, Jannick Schou, and Christina Neumayer. 2018. Cloaked Facebook pages: Exploring fake Islamist propaganda in social media. New Media & Society 20, 5 (May2018), 1850–1867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707759Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96-104.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard Fletcher and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2017. People dont trust news media and this is key to the global misinformation debate. AA. VV. , Understanding and Addressing the Disinformation Ecosystem (2017), 13–17. Retrieved from https://firstdraftnews.org/latest/understanding-disinformation/Google Scholar
- Deen Freelon, Charlton McIlwain, and Meredith Clark. 2018. Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society 20, 3 (March 2018), 990–1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676646Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fabio Giglietto, Nicola Righetti, Luca Rossi, and Giada Marino. 2020. It takes a village to manipulate the media: coordinated link sharing behavior during 2018 and 2019 Italian elections. Information, Communication & Society, 1-25.Google Scholar
- Fabio Giglietto, Nicola Righetti, and Luca Rossi. 2020. CooRnet: Detect coordinated link sharing behavior on social media. R package version 0.9.0. https://github.com/fabiogiglietto/CooRnetGoogle Scholar
- Fabio Giglietto, Nicola Righetti, and Giada Marino. 2019. Understanding Coordinated and Inauthentic Link Sharing Behavior on Facebook in the Run-up to 2018 General Election and 2019 European Election in Italy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/3jtehGoogle Scholar
- Nathaniel Gleicher. 2018. Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior Explained. Retrieved from https://about.fb.com/news/2018/12/inside-feed-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior/Google Scholar
- Nir Grinberg, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, Briony Swire-Thompson, and David Lazer. 2019. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363, 6425 (January 2019), 374–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew Guess, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua Tucker. 2019. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Sci Adv 5, 1 (January 2019), eaau4586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew Guess, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2018. Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. European Research Council 9, (2018). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a795/b451b3d38ca1d22a6075dbb0be4fc94b4000.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Lei Guo and Chris Vargo. 2018. “Fake News” and Emerging Online Media Ecosystem: An Integrated Intermedia Agenda-Setting Analysis of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Communic. Res. (June 2018), 0093650218777177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218777177Google Scholar
- Zied Ben Houidi, Giuseppe Scavo, Stefano Traverso, Renata Teixeira, Marco Mellia, and Soumen Ganguly. 2019. The News We Like Are Not the News We Visit: News Categories Popularity in Usage Data. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, aaai.org, 91–102.Google Scholar
- Philip N. Howard, Samuel Woolley, and Ryan Calo. 2018. Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 15, 2 (April 2018), 81–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caroline Jack. 2017. Lexicon of lies: Terms for problematic information. Data & Society 3, (2017). Retrieved from https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2017/08/apo-nid183786-11805 16.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Henry Jenkins. 2006. Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. NYU Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Franziska B. Keller, David Schoch, Sebastian Stier, and Junghwan Yang. 2019. Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign. Political Communication (October 2019), 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888Google Scholar
- Lance W. Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15:5, 739-768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Lazer, Matthew Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J. Berinsky, Kelly M. Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J. Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, Michael Schudson, Steven A. Sloman, Cass R. Sunstein, Emily A. Thorson, Duncan J. Watts, and Jonathan L. Zittrain. 2018. The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brian D. Loader and Dan Mercea. 2011. Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luca Luceri, Ashok Deb, Silvia Giordano, and Emilio Ferrara. 2019. Evolution of bot and human behavior during elections. First Monday 24, 9 (August 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i9.10213Google Scholar
- Tessa Lyons. 2018. Increasing Our Efforts to Fight False News. Retrieved from https://about.fb.com/news/2018/06/increasing-our-efforts-to-fight-false-news/Google Scholar
- Marwick, A. E. (2018). Why do people share fake news? A sociotechnical model of media effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 474-512.Google Scholar
- Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis. 2017. Media manipulation and disinformation online. New York: Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved from https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2017/05/apo-nid135936-12178 06.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Katerina Eva Matsa and Elisa Shearer. 2018. News use across social media platforms 2018. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/Google Scholar
- Fred Morstatter, Liang Wu, Tahora H. Nazer, Kathleen M. Carley, and Huan Liu. 2016. A new approach to bot detection: Striking the balance between precision and recall. In 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), ieeexplore.ieee.org, 533–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752287Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacob L. Nelson and Harsh Taneja. 2018. The small, disloyal fake news audience: The role of audience availability in fake news consumption. New Media & Society 20, 10 (October 2018), 3720–3737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818758715Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dana Rotman, Sarah Vieweg, Sarita Yardi, Ed Chi, Jenny Preece, Ben Shneiderman, Peter Pirolli, and Tom Glaisyer. 2011. From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. dl.acm.org, 819–822. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1979742.1979543Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meredith Salisbury and Jefferson Pooley. 2017. The #nofilter self: The contest for authenticity among social networking sites, 2002–2016. Soc. Sci. 6, 1 (2017), 10. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/1/10Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giovanni C. Santia, Munif Ishad Mujib, and Jake Ryland Williams. 2019. Detecting Social Bots on Facebook in an Information Veracity Context. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, wvvw.aaai.org, 463–472. Retrieved from https://wvvw.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/3244Google Scholar
- Clay Shirky. 2008. Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin Book, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Brian E. Weeks and Homero Gil de Zúñiga. 2019. What's Next? Six Observations for the Future of Political Misinformation Research. American Behavioral Scientist, 0002764219878236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878236Google Scholar
- Samuel C. Woolley and Philip N. Howard. 2016. Automation, algorithms, and politics| political communication, computational propaganda, and autonomous agents. International Journal of Communication, 10(2016), 4882–4890Google Scholar
- Kai-Cheng Yang, Onur Varol, Pik-Mai Hui, and Filippo Menczer. 2019. Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data Selection. arXiv [cs.CY]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09179Google Scholar
Recommendations
The Janus face of Facebook: Positive and negative sides of social networking site use
AbstractThere is an increasing awareness that social networking site (SNS) use includes a socio-psychologically positive and a negative side. However, research remains largely silent on which side dominates in driving SNS use. To address this ...
Highlights- We investigate the two sides of self-presentation and need to belong in SNSs.
- ...
On commenting behavior of Facebook users
HT '13: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social MediaFacebook treats friends as a single homogeneous group even though people on Facebook are possibly acquainted with diverse group of individuals and perceive their friends as representatives of different groups. It is a common observation that people tend ...
Effects of Credibility Indicators on Social Media News Sharing Intent
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn recent years, social media services have been leveraged to spread fake news stories. Helping people spot fake stories by marking them with credibility indicators could dissuade them from sharing such stories, thus reducing their amplification. We ...
Comments