skip to main content
10.1145/3404835.3463001acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Rumor Detection on Social Media with Event Augmentations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the rapid growth of digital data on the Internet, rumor detection on social media has been vital. Existing deep learning-based methods have achieved promising results due to their ability to learn high-level representations of rumors. Despite the success, we argue that these approaches require large reliable labeled data to train, which is time-consuming and data-inefficient. To address this challenge, we present a new solution, Rumor Detection on social media with Event Augmentations (RDEA), which innovatively integrates three augmentation strategies by modifying both reply attributes and event structure to extract meaningful rumor propagation patterns and to learn intrinsic representations of user engagement. Moreover, we introduce contrastive self-supervised learning for the efficient implementation of event augmentations and alleviate limited data issues. Extensive experiments conducted on two public datasets demonstrate that RDEA achieves state-of-the-art performance over existing baselines. Besides, we empirically show the robustness of RDEA when labeled data are limited.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

SIGIR_video.mp4

mp4

6 MB

References

  1. Pablo Barberá, John T. Jost, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker, and Richard Bonneau. 2015. Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber? Psychological Science (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tian Bian, Xi Xiao, Tingyang Xu, Peilin Zhao, Wenbing Huang, Yu Rong, and Junzhou Huang. 2020. Rumor Detection on Social Media with Bi-Directional Graph Convolutional Networks. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, and Barbara Poblete. 2011. Information credibility on twitter. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sooji Han, Jie Gao, and Fabio Ciravegna. 2019. Data augmentation for rumor detection using context-sensitive neural language model with large-scale credibility corpus. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling. 2017. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sejeong Kwon, Meeyoung Cha, K. Jung, Wei Chen, and Y. Wang. 2013. Prominent Features of Rumor Propagation in Online Social Media. In ICDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yang Liu and Yi-fang Brook Wu. 2018. Early Detection of Fake News on Social Media Through Propagation Path Classification with Recurrent and Convolutional Networks. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Ma, Wei Gao, P. Mitra, Sejeong Kwon, Bernard J. Jansen, K. Wong, and Meeyoung Cha. 2016. Detecting Rumors from Microblogs with Recurrent Neural Networks. In IJCAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Zhongyu Wei, Yueming Lu, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2015. Detect Rumors Using Time Series of Social Context Information on Microblogging Websites. In CIKM. 1751--1754.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jing Ma, Wei Gao, and K. Wong. 2018. Rumor Detection on Twitter with Tree-structured Recursive Neural Networks. In ACL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jing Ma, Wei Gao, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2017. Detect Rumors in Microblog Posts Using Propagation Structure via Kernel Learning. In ACL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Matthew E. Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. Deep Contextualized Word Representations. In NAACL-HLT. 2227--2237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yu Rong, Wenbing Huang, Tingyang Xu, and Junzhou Huang. 2020. DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classification. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Karishma Sharma, Feng Qian, He Jiang, Natali Ruchansky, Ming Zhang, and Yan Liu. 2019. Combating Fake News: A Survey on Identification and Mitigation Techniques. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kai Shu, Amy Sliva, Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Huan Liu. 2017. Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, Vol. 19, 1 (2017), 22--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H Akin Unver. 2017. Digital Challenges to democracy: politics of automation, attention, and engagement. Journal of International Affairs (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Michela Del Vicario, A. Bessi, F. Zollo, F. Petroni, A. Scala, G. Caldarelli, H. Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2016. The spreading of misinformation online. PNAS, Vol. 113 (2016), 554 -- 559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science, Vol. 359, 6380 (2018), 1146--1151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ke Wu, Song Yang, and Kenny Q. Zhu. 2015. False rumors detection on Sina Weibo by propagation structures. In ICDE. 651--662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Keyulu Xu, Weihua Hu, Jure Leskovec, and Stefanie Jegelka. 2019. How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Fan Yang, Yang Liu, Xiaohui Yu, and Min Yang. 2012. Automatic detection of rumor on Sina Weibo. In MDS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Feng Yu, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Liang Wang, Tieniu Tan, et al. 2017. A Convolutional Approach for Misinformation Identification.. In IJCAI. 3901--3907.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Fan Zhou, Xovee Xu, Goce Trajcevski, and Kunpeng Zhang. 2021. A survey of information cascade analysis: Models, predictions, and recent advances. Comput. Surveys, Vol. 54, 2, Article 27 (2021), 36 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3433000Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Xinyi Zhou and Reza Zafarani. 2020. A Survey of Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities. Comput. Surveys, Vol. 53, 5, Article 109 (2020), 40 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3395046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Arkaitz Zubiaga, Ahmet Aker, Kalina Bontcheva, Maria Liakata, and Rob Procter. 2018. Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A Survey. Comput. Surveys, Vol. 51, 2, Article 32 (2018), 36 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161603Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Rumor Detection on Social Media with Event Augmentations

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGIR '21: Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
          July 2021
          2998 pages
          ISBN:9781450380379
          DOI:10.1145/3404835

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 July 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader