Phoebe Lin
ABSTRACT
Artificial Intelligence (AI) education is an increasingly popular topic area for K-12 teachers. However, little research has investigated how AI curriculum and tools can be designed to be more accessible to all teachers and learners. In this study, we take a Value-Sensitive Design approach to understanding the role of teacher values in the design of AI curriculum and tools, and identifying opportunities to integrate AI into core curriculum to leverage learners’ interests. We organized co-design workshops with 15 K-12 teachers, where teachers and researchers co-created lesson plans using AI tools and embedding AI concepts into various core subjects. We found that K-12 teachers need additional scaffolding in AI tools and curriculum to facilitate ethics and data discussions, and value supports for learner evaluation and engagement, peer-to-peer collaboration, and critical reflection. We present an exemplar lesson plan that shows entry points for teaching AI in non-computing subjects and reflect on co-designing with K-12 teachers in a remote setting.
- 2011. Miro. https://miro.com/. Accessed: 2020-08-13.Google Scholar
- 2011. Zoom. https://zoom.us/. Accessed: 2020-08-13.Google Scholar
- 2013. Slack. https://slack.com/. Accessed: 2020-08-13.Google Scholar
- 2020. A to Z of AI with Google. https://atozofai.withgoogle.com/intl/en-US/about/. Accessed: 2020-08-13.Google Scholar
- Adam Agassi, Hadas Erel, Iddo Yehoshua Wald, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Scratch nodes ML: A playful system for children to create gesture recognition classifiers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Safinah Ali and Brian Jordan. 2020. Doodles to Pictures!https://mitmedialab.github.io/GAN-play/. Accessed: 2020-09-10.Google Scholar
- Safinah Ali, Blakeley H Payne, Randi Williams, Hae Won Park, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. Constructionism, Ethics, and Creativity: Developing Primary and Middle School Artificial Intelligence Education. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Education in Artificial Intelligence in K-12. Springer, Cyberspace.Google Scholar
- Jan Auernhammer. 2020. Human-centered AI: The role of Human-centered Design Research in the development of AI. In Synergy - DRS International Conference 2020. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.282Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Berk. 2017. An impact assessment of machine learning risk forecasts on parole board decisions and recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology 13, 2 (2017), 193–216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karl-Emil Kjær Bilstrup, Magnus H Kaspersen, and Marianne Graves Petersen. 2020. Staging Reflections on Ethical Dilemmas in Machine Learning: A Card-Based Design Workshop for High School Students. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1211–1222.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harald Burgsteiner, Martin Kandlhofer, and Gerald Steinbauer. 2016. IRobot: Teaching the basics of artificial intelligence in high schools. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 4126–4127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harald Burgsteiner, Martin Kandlhofer, and Gerald Steinbauer. 2016. Irobot: Teaching the basics of artificial intelligence in high schools. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michelle Carney, Barron Webster, Irene Alvarado, Kyle Phillips, Noura Howell, Jordan Griffith, Jonas Jongejan, Amit Pitaru, and Alexander Chen. 2020. Teachable Machine: Approachable Web-Based Tool for Exploring Machine Learning Classification. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.Google Scholar
- H. Chen. 2009. AI, E-government, and Politics 2.0. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24, 5 (2009), 64–86.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Licui Chen and Sihan Xiao. 2020. Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review(2020), 100377.Google Scholar
- Code.org. 2019. AI for Oceans. https://code.org/oceans. Accessed: 2020-09-10.Google Scholar
- Mathieu d’Aquin. 2020. The Data Ethics Challenges of Explainable AI and Their Knowledge-Based Solutions.In Knowledge Graphs for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Applications and Challenges, Ilaria Tiddi, Freddy Lécué, and Pascal Hitzler (Eds.). Studies on the Semantic Web, Vol. 47. IOS Press, Berlin, 262–275.Google Scholar
- Manuj Dhariwal and Shruti Dhariwal. 2020. Let’s Chance: Playful Probabilistic Programming for Children. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.Google Scholar
- Daniella DiPaola, Blakeley H Payne, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2020. Decoding design agendas: an ethical design activity for middle school students. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference. 1–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrea L Dixon, Catherine Tucker, and Mary Ann Clark. 2010. Integrating social justice advocacy with national standards of practice: Implications for school counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision 50, 2 (2010), 103–115.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alison G Dover. 2013. Getting “up to code”: Preparing for and confronting challenges when teaching for social justice in standards-based classrooms. Action in Teacher Education 35, 2 (2013), 89–102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stefania Druga. 2018. Growing up with AI: Cognimates: from coding to teaching machines. Master’s thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Stefania Druga, Sarah T Vu, Eesh Likhith, and Tammy Qiu. 2019. Inclusive AI literacy for kids around the world. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019. 104–111.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eva Durall, Merja Bauters, Iida Hietala, Teemu Leinonen, and Evangelos Kapros. 2020. Co-creation and co-design in technology-enhanced learning: Innovating science learning outside the classroom. Interaction Design and Architecture (s) 42 (2020), 202–226.Google Scholar
- Education World Inc.2020. U.S. Education Standards. https://www.educationworld.com/standards/national/. Accessed: 2020-09-15.Google Scholar
- Torrie K Edwards. 2020. From the Editorial Board: Tangled Discrimination in Schools: Binding Hair to Control Student Identity. The High School Journal 103, 2 (2020), 53–56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Juliana J Ferreira and Mateus S Monteiro. 2020. What Are People Doing About XAI User Experience? A Survey on AI Explainability Research and Practice. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 56–73.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler, Natalie Garrett, and Nathan Beard. 2020. What Do We Teach When We Teach Tech Ethics? A Syllabi Analysis. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 289–295.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Batya Friedman, David G Hendry, and Alan Borning. 2017. A survey of value sensitive design methods. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 11, 2(2017), 63–125.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Batya Friedman and Peter H Kahn Jr. 2003. Human values, ethics, and design. The human-computer interaction handbook(2003), 1177–1201.Google Scholar
- Ashok Goel. 2017. AI Education for the World. AI Magazine 38, 2 (2017), 3–4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Goldweber, John Barr, Tony Clear, Renzo Davoli, Samuel Mann, Elizabeth Patitsas, and Scott Portnoff. 2013. A framework for enhancing the social good in computing education: a values approach. ACM Inroads 4, 1 (2013), 58–79.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbara J Grosz, David Gray Grant, Kate Vredenburgh, Jeff Behrends, Lily Hu, Alison Simmons, and Jim Waldo. 2019. Embedded EthiCS: integrating ethics across CS education. Commun. ACM 62, 8 (2019), 54–61.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1(2013), 14–23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clint Heinze, Janet Haase, and Helen Higgins. 2010. An action research report from a multiyear approach to teaching artificial intelligence at the K-6 level. In 1st symposium on educational advances in artificial intelligence.Google Scholar
- Aaron Hertzmann. 2020. Visual Indeterminacy in GAN Art. Leonardo 53, 4 (2020), 424–428.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tom Hitron, Yoav Orlev, Iddo Wald, Ariel Shamir, Hadas Erel, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Can Children Understand Machine Learning Concepts? The Effect of Uncovering Black Boxes. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ayanna Howard and Jason Borenstein. 2018. The ugly truth about ourselves and our robot creations: the problem of bias and social inequity. Science and engineering ethics 24, 5 (2018), 1521–1536.Google Scholar
- Ole Sejer Iversen, Kim Halskov, and Tuck W Leong. 2012. Values-led participatory design. CoDesign 8, 2-3 (2012), 87–103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonas Jongejan, Henry Rowley, Takashi Kawashima, Jongmin Kim, and Nick Fox-Gieg. 2017. Google Quick, Draw!https://quickdraw.withgoogle.com/. Accessed: 2020-09-16.Google Scholar
- K Megasari Kahn, Rani Megasari, Erna Piantari, and Enjun Junaeti. 2018. AI programming by children using Snap! block programming in a developing country. In Thirteenth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning 2018. Springer, Leeds, UK, 1–14.Google Scholar
- Lorraine Kisselburgh, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Lorrie Cranor, Jonathan Lazar, and Vicki L Hanson. 2020. HCI Ethics, Privacy, Accessibility, and the Environment: A Town Hall Forum on Global Policy Issues. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dale Lane. 2020. Machine Learning for Kids. https://machinelearningforkids.co.uk/. Accessed: 2020-09-05.Google Scholar
- Phoebe Lin, Jessica Van Brummelen, Galit Lukin, Randi Williams, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2020. Zhorai: Designing a Conversational Agent for Children to Explore Machine Learning Concepts.. In AAAI. AAAI, New York, NY, USA, 13381–13388.Google Scholar
- Daria Loi, Christine T Wolf, Jeanette L Blomberg, Raphael Arar, and Margot Brereton. 2019. Co-designing AI Futures: Integrating AI Ethics, Social Computing, and Design. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion. 381–384.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Duri Long and Brian Magerko. 2020. What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727Google ScholarDigital Library
- MIT App Inventor. 2020. Artificial Intelligence with MIT App Inventor. https://appinventor.mit.edu/explore/ai-with-mit-app-inventor. Accessed: 2020-09-10.Google Scholar
- Henrik Mucha, Dennis Mevißen, Sebastian Robert, Ricarda Jacobi, Kirsten Meyer, Winfried Heusler, and Daniel Arztmann. 2020. Co-Design Futures for AI and Space: A Workbook Sprint. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.Google Scholar
- Reiichiro Nakano. 2019. Arbitrary Style Transfer in the Browser. https://reiinakano.com/arbitrary-image-stylization-tfjs/. Accessed: 2020-09-16.Google Scholar
- Taro Narahara and Yoshihiro Kobayashi. 2018. Personalizing homemade bots with plug & play AI for STEAM education. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2018 Technical Briefs. 1–4.Google Scholar
- Norzila Ngadiman, Shahida Sulaiman, Norsham Idris, and Hasnah Mohamed. 2020. A Comparative Study on Quality Characteristics in Designing Educational Applications. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 10, 8(2020).Google ScholarCross Ref
- NSTA. 2014. Access the Next Generation Science Standards by Topic. https://ngss.nsta.org/AccessStandardsByTopic.aspx. Accessed: 2020-09-14.Google Scholar
- Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, Erik Harpstead, Benjamin Xie, Betsy DiSalvo, Ahmed Kharrufa, Petr Slovak, Amy Ogan, Joseph Jay Williams, and Michael J Lee. 2020. Learning and education in HCI: A reflection on the SIG at CHI 2019. Interactions 27, 5 (2020), 6–7.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Samiullah Paracha, Lynne Hall, Kathy Clawson, Nicole Mitsche, and Fatima Jamil. 2019. Co-design with Children: Using Participatory Design for Design Thinking and Social and Emotional Learning. Open Education Studies 1, 1 (2019), 267–280.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William R Penuel. 2019. Co-design as infrastructuring with attention to power: Building collective capacity for equitable teaching and learning through design-based implementation research. In Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning. Springer, Cham, 387–401.Google Scholar
- Marc Prensky. 2008. Programming is the new literacy. Edutopia magazine (2008).Google Scholar
- Jeremy Roschelle, William Penuel, and Nicole Shechtman. 2006. Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 606–612.Google Scholar
- Troy D Sadler, Aidin Amirshokoohi, Mahsa Kazempour, and Kathleen M Allspaw. 2006. Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 43, 4 (2006), 353–376.Google Scholar
- Bawornsak Sakulkueakulsuk, Siyada Witoon, Potiwat Ngarmkajornwiwat, Pornpen Pataranutaporn, Werasak Surareungchai, Pat Pataranutaporn, and Pakpoom Subsoontorn. 2018. Kids making AI: Integrating Machine Learning, Gamification, and Social Context in STEM Education. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE). IEEE, 1005–1010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffrey Saltz, Michael Skirpan, Casey Fiesler, Micha Gorelick, Tom Yeh, Robert Heckman, Neil Dewar, and Nathan Beard. 2019. Integrating ethics within machine learning courses. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 19, 4 (2019), 1–26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth B-N Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4, 1 (2008), 5–18.Google Scholar
- Michael Scaife, Yvonne Rogers, Frances Aldrich, and Matt Davies. 1997. Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems. 343–350.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander Scheidt and Tim Pulver. 2019. Any-Cubes: A Children’s Toy for Learning AI: Enhanced Play with Deep Learning and MQTT. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019. 893–895.Google Scholar
- Samuel Severance, William R Penuel, Tamara Sumner, and Heather Leary. 2016. Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of the Learning Sciences 25, 4 (2016), 531–564.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Skirpan, Nathan Beard, Srinjita Bhaduri, Casey Fiesler, and Tom Yeh. 2018. Ethics education in context: A case study of novel ethics activities for the CS classroom. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 940–945.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ahuva Sperling and Dorit Lickerman. 2012. Integrating AI and machine learning in software engineering course for high school students. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. 244–249.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shashank Srikant and Varun Aggarwal. 2017. Introducing data science to school kids. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 561–566.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Stray. 2019. Making artificial intelligence work for investigative journalism. Digital Journalism 7, 8 (2019), 1076–1097.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Danny Tang, Yuria Utsumi, and Natalie Lao. 2019. PIC: A Personal Image Classification Webtool for High School Students. In Proceedings of the 2019 IJCAI EduAI Workshop. IJCAI.Google Scholar
- TensorFlow. 2020. Mobile BERT Q & A. https://storage.googleapis.com/tfjs-models/demos/mobilebert-qna/index.html. Accessed: 2020-09-10.Google Scholar
- T. Toivonen, I. Jormanainen, J. Kahila, M. Tedre, T. Valtonen, and H. Vartiainen. 2020. Co-Designing Machine Learning Apps in K–12 With Primary School Children. In 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). 308–310.Google Scholar
- David Touretzky, Christina Gardner-McCune, Cynthia Breazeal, Fred Martin, and Deborah Seehorn. 2019. A year in K-12 AI education. AI Magazine 40, 4 (2019), 88–90.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Touretzky, Christina Gardner-McCune, Cynthia Breazeal, Fred Martin, and Deborah Seehorn. 2019. A year in K-12 AI education. AI Magazine 40, 4 (2019), 88–90.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Touretzky, Christina Gardner-McCune, Fred Martin, and Deborah Seehorn. 2019. Envisioning AI for K-12: What should every child know about AI?. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 9795–9799.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Touretzky, Christina Gardner-McCune, Fred Martin, and Deborah Seehorn. 2019. Envisioning AI for K-12: What should every child know about AI?. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. AAAI, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 9795–9799.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David S Touretzky and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2018. Calypso for Cozmo: Robotic AI for everyone. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1110–1110.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marie E Vachovsky, Grace Wu, Sorathan Chaturapruek, Olga Russakovsky, Richard Sommer, and Li Fei-Fei. 2016. Toward more gender diversity in CS through an artificial intelligence summer program for high school girls. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. 303–308.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jessica Van Brummelen. 2019. Conversational Agents to Democratize Artificial Intelligence. In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, 239–240.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jessica Van Brummelen, Tommy Heng, and Viktoriya Tabunshchyk. 2021. Teaching Tech to Talk: K-12 Conversational Artificial Intelligence Literacy Curriculum and Development Tools. In EAAI at AAAI. AAAI, New York, NY, USA, 13381–13388.Google Scholar
- Jessica Van Brummelen, Tommy Heng, and Viktoriya Tabunshchyk. 2021. Teaching Tech to Talk: K-12 Conversational Artificial Intelligence Literacy Curriculum and Development Tools. In 2021 AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jessica Van Brummelen and Phoebe Lin. 2020. Appendix. https://gist.github.com/jessvb/f415307d4696e6754e2f2e39a0a897c0. Accessed: 2020-12-23.Google Scholar
- Maarten Van Mechelen, Jan Derboven, Ann Laenen, Bert Willems, David Geerts, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2017. The GLID method: Moving from design features to underlying values in co-design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 97 (2017), 116–128.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maarten Van Mechelen, Ann Laenen, Bieke Zaman, Bert Willems, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2019. Collaborative Design Thinking (CoDeT): A co-design approach for high child-to-adult ratios. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 130 (2019), 179–195.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Vazhayil, R. Shetty, R. R. Bhavani, and N. Akshay. 2019. Focusing on Teacher Education to Introduce AI in Schools: Perspectives and Illustrative Findings. In 2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E). 71–77.Google Scholar
- Xiaoyu Wan, Xiaofei Zhou, Zaiqiao Ye, Chase K Mortensen, and Zhen Bai. 2020. SmileyCluster: supporting accessible machine learning in K-12 scientific discovery. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference. 23–35.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Randi Williams, Hae Won Park, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. A is for artificial intelligence: the impact of artificial intelligence activities on young children’s perceptions of robots. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jed R. Wood and Larry E. Wood. 2008. Card Sorting: Current Practices and Beyond. 4, 1 (Nov. 2008), 1–6.Google Scholar
- Julia Woodward, Zari McFadden, Nicole Shiver, Amir Ben-hayon, Jason C Yip, and Lisa Anthony. 2018. Using co-design to examine how children conceptualize intelligent interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin Xie, Erik Harpstead, Betsy DiSalvo, Petr Slovak, Ahmed Kharrufa, Michael J. Lee, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, Amy Ogan, and Joseph Jay Williams. 2019. Learning, Education, and HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311761Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiaozhe Yang. 2019. Accelerated Move for AI Education in China. ECNU Review of Education 2, 3 (2019), 347–352.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adrienne Yapo and Joseph Weiss. 2018. Ethical implications of bias in machine learning. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Svetlana Yarosh, Iulian Radu, Seth Hunter, and Eric Rosenbaum. 2011. Examining values: an analysis of nine years of IDC research. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 136–144.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jason C Yip, Tamara Clegg, June Ahn, Judith Odili Uchidiuno, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Austin Beck, Daniel Pauw, and Kelly Mills. 2016. The evolution of engagements and social bonds during child-parent co-design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3607–3619.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Junnan Yu, Chenke Bai, and Ricarose Roque. 2020. Considering Parents in Coding Kit Design: Understanding Parents’ Perspectives and Roles. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiaofei Zhou, Jessica Van Brummelen, and Phoebe Lin. 2020. Designing AI Learning Experiences for K-12: Emerging Works, Future Opportunities and a Design Framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.10228(2020).Google Scholar
- Michelle Zimmerman. 2018. Teaching AI: Exploring New Frontiers for Learning. International Society for Technology in Education (12 2018).Google Scholar
- Abigail Zimmermann-Niefield, R Benjamin Shapiro, and Shaun Kane. 2019. Sports and machine learning: How young people can use data from their own bodies to learn about machine learning. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 25, 4 (2019), 44–49.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abigail Zimmermann-Niefield, R Benjamin Shapiro, and Shaun Kane. 2019. Sports and machine learning: How young people can use data from their own bodies to learn about machine learning. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 25, 4 (2019), 44–49.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Engaging Teachers to Co-Design Integrated AI Curriculum for K-12 Classrooms
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Teachers' Motivation for Teaching AI in K-12 settings
HCAIep '23: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Centered Artificial Intelligence: Education and PracticeThere is a growing consensus that both teachers and students have to understand AI and be able to appraise the trustworthiness of AI technologies used in classrooms. This could be achieved, to some extent, through the promotion of AI literacy in K-12. ...
A survey of Australian teachers' self-efficacy and assessment approaches for the K-12 digital technologies curriculum
WiPSCE '18: Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing EducationAs K-12 computer science (CS) education has been introduced to a number of countries around the world, the CS education community has been busy working to understand the learning and teaching of computing at these year levels, as well as how to build ...
Co-Designing an AI Curriculum with University Researchers and Middle School Teachers
SIGCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2Over the past year, our AI4GA team of university faculty and middle school teachers have co-designed a middle school AI curriculum. In this poster we share how we used co-design both as a tool for collaboratively developing engaging AI activities and as ...
Comments