skip to main content
10.1145/3414752.3414802acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TRIZ Technical Contradiction Extraction Method Based on Patent Semantic Space Mapping

Published:18 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Analyzing technical contradictions according to TRIZ theory can help us solve the innovative and inventive problems effectively. However, the existing analysis and extraction methods of technical contradiction mainly rely on manual rule formulation and make less use of the semantics information, which limits the improvement of the efficiency and accuracy of the extraction. Consequently, this paper proposed an extraction method based on patent semantic space mapping. It adopted the Doc2Vec model to construct the semantic space of the patent text and trained extraction model by using feature vectors covering rich semantic relationships, which could make us recognize the technical contradictions from patents better. This paper used patent data in the automobile field as a sample to perform experiments. The accuracy of the technical contradiction recognition was improved compared with the baseline model based on rule formulation.

References

  1. Alʹtshuller, G. S. 1999. The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity. Technical innovation center, Inc., Worcester.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Savransky, S. 2000. Engineering of Creativity. CRC Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Orloff, M. 2012. Modern TRIZ. Springer, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. He, C., Loh H. T. 2010. Pattern-oriented Associative Rule-based Patent Classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 3(Mar. 2010), 2395-2404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Park, H., Ree, J. J., Kim, K. 2013. Identification of Promising Patents for Technology Transfers Using TRIZ Evolution Trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 2(Feb. 2013), 736-743.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhai, D. S., Xia, J., Zhang, J., Li Q., Luan, B. Y. 2015. Research on Construction of Technology Tree Based on Patent Feature Extraction. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 34, 7(Jul. 2015), 717-724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Du, X. J., Xiong, Y., Liu, L. F., Shi, Q. 2017. Patent Knowledge Representation and Organization Based on Multi-attribute. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 24, 1(Jan. 2017), 1-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Li, R., Sa, R. N., Huang, X. J. 2017. Patent Information Organization Based on TRIZ: A Case Study in the Field of New Energy Car Battery. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 36, 2(Feb. 2017), 111-122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin, L., Rasovska, I., De, Guio R., Dubois, S. 2013. Algorithm for identifying generalised technical contradictions in experiments. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, 47, 4-8, 563-588.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Montecchi, T., Russo, D. 2015. Knowledge based approach for formulating TRIZ contradictions. Procedia Engineering, 131, 451-463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wei, Z., Li, Q., Wang, D., Tian, Y. 2009. The Application of LT-Table in TRIZ Contradiction Resolving Process. In Growth and Development of Computer-Aided Innovation. Springer, Heidelberg, 266-275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tseng, C. K., Chung, C. H., Dai, B. R. 2014. Classifying the TRIZ Contradiction Problem of the Patents Based on Engineering Parameters. In Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cham. Springer, Berlin, 344-353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu, Z. Y., Fang, S., Zhang, X., Wen, Y., Liang, T. 2015. Study on Personalized Semantic TRIZ. Library and Information Service, 59, 7(Jul. 2015), 121-131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Campr, M., Ježek, K. 2015. Comparing Semantic Models for Evaluating Automatic Document Summarization. In Text, Speech, and Dialogue. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 252-260.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., Dean, J. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc., in Nevada, 3111-3119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Le, Q., Mikolov, T. 2014. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In Proceedings of The 31st International Conference on Machine Learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, Beijing, 1188-1196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mann, D., Dewulf, S., Zlotin, B., Zusman, A. 2003. Matrix 2003: Updating the TRIZ Contradiction Matrix. CREAX Press, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEME '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
    July 2020
    312 pages
    ISBN:9781450388016
    DOI:10.1145/3414752

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format