skip to main content
10.1145/3417519.3417558acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Method for Automatic Tracking of Cell Nuclei With Weakly-Supervised Mitosis Detection in 2D Microscopy Image Sequences

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to a high interest in microscopic cell migration analysis for biological research, numerous cell segmentation and tracking algorithms has emerged. The main tasks of cell tracking methods are to segment each cell and establish individual cell lineages over time, accounting for possible cell disappearance and division events. In some datasets, cells can drastically change their appearance during the mitosis stage, thus making division detection a challenging problem. The most prominent methods exploit different neural network architectures for at least one of these tasks. We propose a method that uses a single UNet topology network to solve both tasks of cell nuclei instance segmentation and detection of mitotic events. For instance segmentation, the network is learned to segment primary masks and object centroids that are used by watershed transform to obtain individual nuclei regions. For mitotic events detection, we first manually mark cells entering and finishing mitosis. Then, previously trained network is used to generate weak nuclei segmentation labels for all data images in sequences with marked mitotic events. We add an additional output to the trained network for segmentation of mitotic events. The training is resumed for both tasks on initial ground truth segmentation, generated weak labels, and crude mitotic events markers. For tracking, we use generalized nearest neighbour method that can greedily search the best 1-to-1 and 1-to-2 instance connections over multiple frames. Segmentation of the mitotic events produced by the trained model is incorporated into the tracking algorithm to improve cell division detection. We evaluate the results of the proposed method and compare it with the previously developed algorithm, achieving better performance on our dataset. We assume it is possible to upgrade other existing segmentation frameworks to also learn the task of segmenting mitotic events and enhance division detection using the proposed pipeline.

References

  1. Erik Bochinski, Volker Eiselein, and Thomas Sikora. 2017. High-speed tracking-by-detection without using image information. In 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alexander Buslaev, Vladimir I Iglovikov, Eugene Khvedchenya, Alex Parinov, Mikhail Druzhinin, and Alexandr A Kalinin. 2020. Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentations. Information 11, 2 (2020), 125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Topaz Gilad, Mark-Anthony Bray, Anne E Carpenter, and Tammy Riklin Raviv. 2015. Symmetry-based mitosis detection in time-lapse microscopy. In 2015 IEEE 12th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI). IEEE, 164--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Alexandr Yu Kondratiev, Hideyuki Yaginuma, Yasushi Okada, and Dmitry V Sorokin. 2018. A Method for Automatic Tracking of Cell Nuclei in 2D Epifluores-cence Microscopy Image Sequences. In 2018 Eighth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Filip Lux and Petr Matula. 2019. DIC Image Segmentation of Dense Cell Populations by Combining Deep Learning and Watershed. In 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019). IEEE, 236--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Pavel Matula, Martin Maška, Dmitry V. Sorokin, Petr Matula, Carlos Ortiz-de Solórzano, and Michal Kozubek. 2015. Cell Tracking Accuracy Measurement Based on Comparison of Acyclic Oriented Graphs. PLOS ONE 10, 12 (12 2015), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Martin Maška, Vladmír Ulman, David Svoboda, et al. 2014. A Benchmark for Comparison of Cell Tracking Algorithms. Bioinformatics 30, 11 (2014), 1609--1617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wei-Zhi Nie, Wei-Hui Li, An-An Liu, Tong Hao, and Yu-Ting Su. 2016. 3D convolutional networks-based mitotic event detection in time-lapse phase contrast microscopy image sequences of stem cell populations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 55--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shori Nishimoto, Yuta Tokuoka, Takahiro G Yamada, Noriko Hiroi, and Akira Funahashi. 2018. Predicting the future direction of cell movement with convolutional neural networks. BioRxiv (2018), 388033.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Christian Payer, Darko Štern, Thomas Neff, Horst Bischof, and Martin Urschler. 2018. Instance segmentation and tracking with cosine embeddings and recurrent hourglass networks. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 3--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, 234--241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Caroline A Schneider, Wayne S Rasband, and Kevin W Eliceiri. 2012. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 7 (2012), 671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Anat Shkolyar, Amit Gefen, Dafna Benayahu, and Hayit Greenspan. 2015. Automatic detection of cell divisions (mitosis) in live-imaging microscopy images using convolutional neural networks. In 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). IEEE, 743--746.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Vladmír Ulman, Martin Maška, Klas E. G. Magnusson, et al. 2017. An Objective Comparison of Cell-Tracking Algorithms. Nature Methods 14, 12 (2017), 1141--1152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Pavel Yakubovskiy. 2019. Segmentation Models. https://github.com/qubvel/segmentation_models.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Yao Yao, Ihor Smal, and Erik Meijering. 2018. Deep neural networks for data association in particle tracking. In 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018). IEEE, 458--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Zongwei Zhou, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee, Nima Tajbakhsh, and Jianming Liang. 2018. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation. In Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer, 3--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zibin Zhou, Fei Wang, Wenjuan Xi, Huaying Chen, Peng Gao, and Chengkang He. 2019. Joint Multi-frame Detection and Segmentation for Multi-cell Tracking. In International Conference on Image and Graphics. Springer, 435--446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Method for Automatic Tracking of Cell Nuclei With Weakly-Supervised Mitosis Detection in 2D Microscopy Image Sequences

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICBIP '20: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Biomedical Signal and Image Processing
            August 2020
            99 pages
            ISBN:9781450387767
            DOI:10.1145/3417519

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 September 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader