skip to main content
10.1145/3434780.3436609acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Conceptual Model for Personalized Learning based on Educational Robots

Published:22 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over a previous couple of years, Distance learning has successfully overcome the shortcomings of traditional methods of teaching and learning, likewise increases student interaction and diversities of opinion, online instructors could also be from any location across the world. So students have the chance to settle on a learning strategy most suited to their abilities, while education is streamlined to satisfy the requirements of the individual in question. Due to the on-going technological change, we are witnessing, Robots are getting an integral component of our society and have great potential in being utilized as an academic technology by providing students with a highly interactive and hands-on learning experience. Indeed, Robotics promises to inspire a replacement generation of learning. With the aim of understanding how students can use robots to review, we created and implemented a learning scenario through an ontological conceptual Model for Personalized Learning supported Educational Robots. This model enables us to supply inferences over learning data and supply personalized learning resources, adapted to the progress of the scholar within the learning process.

References

  1. Tracy Newvine, Maureen Hannay.2016. Perceptions of distance learning : A Comparison of Online and Traditional learning. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching.Vol. 2/ No. 1 / March 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Perry, E.H.& Pilati, M.L. 2011,Online Learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 95-104. Retrieved September 18, 2020. DOI: http://www.learntechlib.org/p/110696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gros, B., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Future trends in the design strategies and technological affordances of e-learning. In M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology. An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy (pp. 1-23). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI :10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_67-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Van Harmelen, M. 2006. Personal Learning Environments. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tang, T.Y. , & Mc Calla, G , 2003.Smart Recommendation for an evolving e-learning System. In workshop on Technologies for Electronic Documents for Supporting Learning,International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2003) .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Federica Minichiello, The development of robotics in schools, Revue Internationale d'Education de Sèvres, 75 | 2017, 11-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ries.5864Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. I. Gaudiello 1, E. Zibetti,2013, Educational robotics: Survey and perspectives , cognition humaine et artificielle,v58, March 2013, Pages 17-40. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2012.09.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaudiello, I., Zibetti, E., & Pinaud, C. A. 2012. Control heuristics for educational robots: a pilot study. In Proceedings of 3rd International workshop teaching robotics, teaching with robotics. Integrating robotics in school curriculum Riva del Garda, Trento,Italy,April20,(pp.67–75). DOI: http://www.terecop.eu/TRTWR2012/proceedings.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, J. J. 2013. A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, 1(209-0015), 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Andruseac, G. G., &Iacob, R, 2013. Exploring the potential of using educational robotics as an effective tool to support collaborative learning. In 2013 E-Health and BioengineeringConference (EHB) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Veletsianos, G., & Shoop, E. 2002. Recommender systems and personalization techniques. Technical report, CS 50: Internet Programming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tang, T. Y., &McCalla, G.2003. Smart Recommendation for an evolving e-Learning System. In Workshop on Technologies for Electronic Documents for Supporting Learning, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 699-710).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lim, G.H, Hong, S.W, Lee, I.Suh, I.H, & Beetz, M.2013.Robot recommender system using affection-based episode ontology for personalization. In2013 IEEE RO-MAN (pp. 155-160). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. M., Lee, H. M., Chen, Y. H. Personalized E-Learning System Using Item Response Theory. Computers and Education 44(3), pp. 237–255 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sandvig, J., Burke, R. AACORN: A CBR Recommender for Academic Advising. Technical Report TR05-015, DePaul University, Chicago, USA (2006)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Course Recommender. Senior Thesis, Princeton University (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Cristian Ferrada-Ferrada, Javier Carrillo-Rosúa, Danilo Díaz-Levicoy, and Francisco Silva-Díaz , 2020. Robotics from STEM areas in Primary School : A Systematic Review. Education In The Knowledge Society 21. DOI:10.14201/eks.22036.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Fernández-Llamas, M. Á. Conde-González, F. J. Rodríguez-Lera, F. J. Rodríguez-Sedano, and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2018. May I teach you? Students' behavior when lectured by robotic vs. human teachers. Computers in Human Behavior 80, 460-469. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.028.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Á. Conde, F. J. Rodríguez Sedano, C. Fernández-Llamas, J. Gonçalves, J. Lima, and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2020. RoboSTEAM Project Systematic Mapping: Challenge Based Learning and Robotics. In 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, (27-30 April 2020, Porto, Portugal) IEEE, USA, 214-221. DOI:10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nuria Aris, Lara Orcos.2019.Educational Robotics in the Stage of Secondary Education: Empirical Study on Motivation and STEM Skills. Open Access JournalEducation Sciences. (ISSN 2227-7102) .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Romero, M., & Dupont, Y. 2016. Educational robotics: from procedural learning to co-creative project oriented challenges with LEGO WeDo. In 8th Conference on Education and New Learning Technology, Barcelona.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. A Conceptual Model for Personalized Learning based on Educational Robots

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
      October 2020
      1084 pages
      ISBN:9781450388504
      DOI:10.1145/3434780

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 January 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format