skip to main content
10.1145/3439231.3439272acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdsaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Perspectives of Visually Impaired Visitors on Museums: Towards an Integrative and Multisensory Framework to Enhance the Museum Experience

Published:09 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although the growing concern to make museums accessible to individuals with visual impairments, their participation in these institutions is still limited, given the multiple barriers they often experience and the lack of assistive technologies to promote access. This research investigates the perspectives of 72 blind and partially sighted individuals on enhancing their visiting experience in museums. A co-created framework to improve visitors’ autonomy is proposed, concluding that sensory, intellectual and physical access must be integrated into the pre, on-site and post phases of visiting museums.

References

  1. Giorgos Anagnostakis, Michalis Antoniou, Elena Kardamitsi, Thodoris Sachinidis, Panayiotis Koutsabasis, Modestos Stavrakis, Spyros Vosinakis, and Dimitris Zissis. 2016. Accessible Museum Collections for the Visually Impaired: Combining Tactile Exploration, Audio Descriptions and Mobile Gestures. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI ’16), ACM, New York, USA, 1021–1025. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2963118Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Eva Cambeiro Andrade, Reiner Delgado, Brigitte Hauptner, Felicia Kerschbaum, Ruth List, Petra Pobežalová, Andreas Reichinger, Sam Sportun, Stefanie Steinbauer, Karol Trnka, and Susanne Wögerbauer. 2015. Inclusive Technologies in Museums: for a Better Access to Culture for Blind and Visually Impaired People. Project AMBAVis, Economica Institute of Economic Research, Vienna.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Vassilios S. Argyropoulos and Charikleia Kanari. 2015. Re-imagining the museum through “touch”: Reflections of individuals with visual disability on their experience of museum-visiting in Greece. Alter, Eur. J. Disabil. Res. 9, 2 (2015), 130–143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2014.12.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Saki Asakawa, João Guerreiro, Dragan Ahmetovic, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. The Present and Future of Museum Accessibility for People with Visual Impairments. In ASSETS ’18 Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ACM, New York, USA, 382–384. DOI:https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3240997Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. (1st ed.), Harris Cooper, Paul M. Camic, Debra L. Long, A. T. Panter, David Rindskopf and Kenneth J. Sher (eds.). American Psychological Association, Washington, 57–71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Francesco Buonamici, Rocco Furferi, Lapo Governi, and Yary Volpe. 2015. Making Blind People Autonomous in the Exploration of Tactile Models: A Feasibility Study. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: Access to Interaction, Margherita Antona and Constantine Stephanidis (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 82–93. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20681-3_8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Radu Comes. 2016. Haptic Devices and Tactile Experiences in Museum Exhibitions. J. Anc. Hist. Archaeol. 3, 4 (2016), 60–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14795/j.v3i4.205Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kalpana Dash and Günther Grohall. 2016. Economic impact of creating and exhibiting 3D objects for blind and visually impaired people in museums. Retrieved September 5, 2020 from http://www.ambavis.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Economic-Aspects_final-disclaimer.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Eugenia Devile and Elisabeth Kastenholz. 2018. Accessible tourism experiences: the voice of people with visual disabilities. J. Policy Res. Tour. Leis. Events 10, 3 (2018), 265–285. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2018.1470183Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Alison F Eardley, Clara Mineiro, Joselia Neves, and Peter Ride. 2016. Redefining Access: Embracing multimodality, memorability and shared experience in Museums. Curator Museum J. 59, 3 (2016), 263–286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. John H Falk. 2009. Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience (1st ed.). Routledge, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Helena Garcia Carrizosa, Kieron Sheehy, Jonathan Rix, Jane Seale, and Simon Hayhoe. 2020. Designing technologies for museums: accessibility and participation issues. J. Enabling Technol. 14, 1 (April 2020), 31–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-08-2019-0038Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Simon Hayhoe. 2017. Blind Visitor Experiences at Art Museums. Rowman & Littlefield, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yohei Hishida and Makoto J. Hirayama. 2018. A route guiding system for visually impaired persons using a hyper-directional speaker. In 2018 International Workshop on Advanced Image Technology (IWAIT), 1–4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IWAIT.2018.8369668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. ICOM. 2020. The theme 2020 – Museums for Equality: Diversity and Inclusion. IMD - International Museum Day. Retrieved October 3, 2020 from http://imd.icom.museum/international-museum-day-2019/museums-as-cultural-hubs-the-future-of-tradition/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. INE. 2012. Censos 2011 Resultados Definitivos - Portugal. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I.P., Lisbon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Apostolos Meliones and Demetrios Sampson. 2018. Blind MuseumTourer: A System for Self-Guided Tours in Museums and Blind Indoor Navigation. Technologies 6, 1 (January 2018), 4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6010004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Susana Mesquita and Maria João Carneiro. 2016. Accessibility of European museums to visitors with visual impairments. Disabil. Soc. 31, 3 (2016), 373–388. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1167671Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Magdalena Pasikowska-Schnass. 2019. Access to cultural life for people with disabilities. Retrieved October 25, 2020 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2019)644200Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Byron Pillow, Margaret Banks, and Deborah Reeves. 2015. Equal Access for All: Providing for Impaired Stakeholders in a Museum Setting. 14. Retrieved October 10, 2020 from https://www.byronpillow.com/uploads/7/6/7/9/76797585/disability_access.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Andreas Reichinger, Anton Fuhrmann, Stefan Maierhofer, and Werner Purgathofer. 2016. Gesture-Based Interactive Audio Guide on Tactile Reliefs. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS ’16, ACM, New York, NY, 91–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982176Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Reichinger, Svenja Schröder, Christian Löw, Sam Sportun, Peter Reichl, and Werner Purgathofer. 2016. Spaghetti, Sink and Sarcophagus: Design Explorations of Tactile Artworks for Visually Impaired People. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI ’16), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 82:1–82:6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2996471Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tooteko. 2018. Tooteko Talking Tactile: News. Retrieved October 10, 2020 from http://www.tooteko.com/news/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Roberto Vaz, Diamantino Freitas, and António Coelho. 2020. Blind and Visually Impaired Visitors’ Experiences in Museums: Increasing Accessibility Through Assistive Technologies. Int. J. Incl. Museum 13, 2 (2020), 57–80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-2014/CGP/v13i02/57-80Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. World Health Organization. 2019. World Report on Vision. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. World Health Organization and World Bank. 2011. World Report on Disability. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    DSAI '20: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion
    December 2020
    245 pages
    ISBN:9781450389372
    DOI:10.1145/3439231

    Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 June 2021

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate17of23submissions,74%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format