skip to main content
10.1145/3450267.3450546acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccpsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Incentivizing routing choices for safe and efficient transportation in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic

Published:19 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected many aspects of people's daily lives. While many countries are in a reopening stage, some effects of the pandemic on people's behaviors are expected to last much longer, including how they choose between different transport options. Experts predict considerably delayed recovery of the public transport options, as people try to avoid crowded places. In turn, significant increases in traffic congestion are expected, since people are likely to prefer using their own vehicles or taxis as opposed to riskier and more crowded options such as the railway. In this paper, we propose to use financial incentives to set the tradeoff between risk of infection and congestion to achieve safe and efficient transportation networks. To this end, we formulate a network optimization problem to optimize taxi fares. For our framework to be useful in various cities and times of the day without much designer effort, we also propose a data-driven approach to learn human preferences about transport options, which is then used in our taxi fare optimization. Our user studies and simulation experiments show our framework is able to minimize congestion and risk of infection.

References

  1. Martin J Beckmann, Charles B McGuire, and Christopher B Winsten. 1955. Studies in the Economics of Transportation. (1955).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Moshe Ben-Akiva and Steven R Lerman. 2018. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. Transportation Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Erdem Biyik, Nicolas Huynh, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, and Dorsa Sadigh. 2020. Active Preference-Based Gaussian Process Regression for Reward Learning. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Erdem Bıyık, Daniel A Lazar, Ramtin Pedarsani, and Dorsa Sadigh. 2018. Altruistic Autonomy: Beating Congestion on Shared Roads. In Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics (WAFR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Erdem Bıyık, Daniel A. Lazar, Dorsa Sadigh, and Ramtin Pedarsani. 2019. The Green Choice: Learning and Influencing Human Decisions on Shared Roads. In Proceedings of the 58th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Erdem Bıyık, Malayandi Palan, Nicholas C. Landolfi, Dylan P. Losey, and Dorsa Sadigh. 2020. Asking Easy Questions: A User-Friendly Approach to Active Reward Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 100), Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Danica Kragic, and Komei Sugiura (Eds.).PMLR, 1177--1190. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v100/biy-ik20a.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Philip N Brown and Jason R Marden. 2016. The robustness of marginal-cost taxes in affine congestion games. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 62, 8 (2016), 3999--4004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Susan Carpenter. 2020. LA Traffic Could Be Worse Post Pandemic. Spectrum News 1 (Jul 2020). https://spectrumnews1.com/ca/la-west/transportation/2020/07/30/la-traffic-could-be-worse-post-pandemicGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. José R Correa, Andreas S Schulz, and Nicolás E Stier-Moses. 2008. A geometric approach to the price of anarchy in nonatomic congestion games. Games and Economic Behavior 64, 2 (2008), 457--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Thomas M Cover. 1999. Elements of information theory. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhiyong Cui, Meixin Zhu, Shuo Wang, Pengfei Wang, Yang Zhou, Qianxia Cao, Cole Kopca, and Yinhai Wang. 2020. Traffic Performance Score for Measuring the Impact of COVID-19 on Urban Mobility. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00648 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mark S Daskin. 1985. Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Richard G Dowling, Rupinder Singh, and Willis Wei-Kuo Cheng. 1998. Accuracy and performance of improved speed-flow curves. Transportation research record 1646, 1 (1998), 9--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Beth Ewoldsen. 2020. COVID-19 Trends Impacting the Future of Transportation Planning and Research. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (Aug 2020). https://www.nationalacademies.org/trb/blog/covid-19-trends-impacting-the-future-of-transportation-planning-and-researchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lisa Fleischer, Kamal Jain, and Mohammad Mahdian. 2004. Tolls for heterogeneous selfish users in multicommodity networks and generalized congestion games. In 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, 277--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Michael Florian and Sang Nguyen. 1976. Recent experience with equilibrium methods for the study of a congested urban area. In Traffic Equilibrium Methods. Springer, 382--395.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniel Golovin and Andreas Krause. 2011. Adaptive submodularity: Theory and applications in active learning and stochastic optimization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 42 (2011), 427--486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Martin Hattrup-Silberberg, Saskia Hausler, Kersten Heineke, Nicholas Laverty, Timo Möller, Dennis Schwedhelm, and Ting Wu. 2020. Five COVID-19 aftershocks reshaping mobility's future. McKinsey & Company (Sep 2020). https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/five-covid-19-attershocks-reshaping-mobilitys-futureGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Patrick Hertzke, Simon Middleton, Guillaume Neu, and Henry Weaver. 2020. Moving forward: How COVID-19 will affect mobility in the United Kingdom. McKinsey & Company (June 2020). https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/moving-forward-how-covid-19-will-affect-mobility-in-the-united-kingdomGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Winnie Hu and Nate Schweber. 2020. Will Cars Rule the Roads in Post-Pandemic New York? The New York Times (Aug 2020). https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/10/nyregion/nyc-streets-parking-dining-busways.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Yue Hu, William Barbour, Samitha Samaranayake, and Dan Work. 2020. Impacts of Covid-19 mode shift on road traffic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01610 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yue Hu, Will Barbour, Samitha Samaranayake, and Dan Work. 2020. The rebound --- How Covid-19 could lead to worse traffic. Medium (Apr 2020). https://medium.com/@barbourww/the-rebound-how-covid-19-could-lead-to-worse-traffic-cb245a5b1da2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Larry Kahaner. 2020. Working from home a major factor in post-pandemic traffic. FleetOwner (Aug 2020). https://www.fleetowner.com/covid-19-coverage/article/21139861/working-from-home-a-major-factor-in-postpandemic-trafficGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nathan Kallus and Madeleine Udell. 2016. Revealed preference at scale: Learning personalized preferences from assortment choices. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. 821--837.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yuhao Kang, Song Gao, Yunlei Liang, Mingxiao Li, Jinmeng Rao, and Jake Kruse. 2020. Multiscale dynamic human mobility flow dataset in the us during the covid-19 epidemic. arXiv preprint arXiv.2008.12238 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Frank S Koppelman. 1983. Predicting transit ridership in response to transit service changes. Journal of Transportation Engineering 109, 4 (1983), 548--564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Dieter Kraft. 1988. A Software Package for Sequential Quadratic Programming. Technical Report. Institut für Dynamik der Flugsysteme Oberpfaffenhofen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Walid Krichene, Jack D Reilly, Saurabh Amin, and Alexandre M Bayen. 2018. Stackelberg routing on parallel transportation networks. Handbook of Dynamic Game Theory (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rafał Kucharski and Arkadiusz Drabicki. 2017. Estimating macroscopic volume delay functions with the traffic density derived from measured speeds and flows. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2017 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Daniel Lazar, Samuel Coogan, and Ramtin Pedarsani. 2020. Routing for traffic networks with mixed autonomy. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Daniel A Lazar, Erdem Bıyık, Dorsa Sadigh, and Ramtin Pedarsani. 2019. Learning How to Dynamically Route Autonomous Vehicles on Shared Roads. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.03664 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Daniel A Lazar, Samuel Coogan, and Ramtin Pedarsani. 2019. Optimal tolling for heterogeneous traffic networks with mixed autonomy. In 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, 4103--4108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Negar Mehr and Roberto Horowitz. 2019. How will the presence of autonomous vehicles affect the equilibrium state of traffic networks? IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems 7, 1 (2019), 96--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. United States. Bureau of Public Roads. 1964. Traffic assignment manual. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Public Roads, Office of Planning, Urban Planning Division.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jordan Pascale. 2020. Here Are Four Charts That Show The Pandemic's Impact On Locals' Travel Habits. Wamu (Jul 2020). https://wamu.org/story/20/07/16/here-are-four-charts-that-show-the-pandemics-impact-on-locals-travel-habits/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Neil Pedersen. 2020. Impacts of COVID-19 on Transportation and Key Considerations for the Future. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/PedersenlTEAnnual%20Meeting200813.pptx Presentation at ITE 2020 Annual Meeting (Online).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Republic of Turkey Governorship of Istanbul. 2020. Governor Yerlikaya Made a Press Release Regarding Gradual Working Hours Practice in Istanbul. (Sep 2020). http://en.istanbul.gov.tr/governor-yerlikaya-made-a-press-release-regarding-gradual-working-hours-practice-in-istanbulGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Tim Roughgarden and Éva Tardos. 2002. How bad is selfish routing? Journal of the ACM (JACM) 49, 2 (2002), 236--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Dorsa Sadigh, Anca D. Dragan, S. Shankar Sastry, and Sanjit A. Seshia. 2017. Active Preference-Based Learning of Reward Functions. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. William H Sandholm. 2002. Evolutionary implementation and congestion pricing. The Review of Economic Studies 69, 3 (2002), 667--689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Chaitanya Swamy. 2012. The effectiveness of Stackelberg strategies and tolls for network congestion games. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) 8, 4 (2012), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Chris Teale. 2020. Transportation leaders focus on regaining trust before building anew. Smart Cities Dive (May 2020). https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/news/transportation-leaders-focus-on-regaining-trust-before-building-anew/577394Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Alejandro Tirachini and Oded Cats. 2020. COVID-19 and public transportation: Current assessment, prospects, and research needs. Journal of Public Transportation 22, 1 (2020), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Joe Vitale, Karen Bowman, and Ryan Robinson. 2020. How the pandemic is changing the future of automotive. Deloitte (Jul 2020). https://deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/retail-distribution/consumer-behavior-trends-state-of-the-consumer-tracker/future-of-automotive-industry-pandemic.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Songhe Wang, Kangda Wei, Lei Lin, and Weizi Li. 2020. Spatial-temporal Analysis of COVID-19's Impact on Human Mobility: the Case of the United States. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03707 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Lars F Westblade, Gagandeep Brar, Laura C Pinheiro, Demetrios Paidoussis, Mangala Rajan, Peter Martin, Parag Goyal, Jorge L Sepulveda, Lisa Zhang, Gary George, et al. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 viral load predicts mortality in patients with and without cancer who are hospitalized with COVID-19. Cancer cell (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Nils Wilde, Dana Kulic, and Stephen L Smith. 2020. Active Preference Learning using Maximum Regret. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Wai Wong and SC Wong. 2016. Network topological effects on the macroscopic Bureau of Public Roads function. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 12, 3 (2016), 272--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Morteza Zadimoghaddam and Aaron Roth. 2012. Efficiently learning from revealed preference. In International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics. Springer, 114--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Hongyu Zheng, Kenan Zhang, and Marco Nie. 2020. The Fall and Rise of the Taxi Industry in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study. Available at SSRN 3674241 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Incentivizing routing choices for safe and efficient transportation in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICCPS '21: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 12th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems
        May 2021
        242 pages
        ISBN:9781450383530
        DOI:10.1145/3450267

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 May 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate25of91submissions,27%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader