skip to main content
10.1145/3469410.3469413acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

More-Than-Human Future Cities: From the design of nature to designing for and through nature.

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper examines ways in which media architecture and information design can contribute to multispecies wellbeing and coexistence in urban and peri-urban environments. It argues that a radical shift is needed, from looking at design as a tool to plan tamed nature into urban fabric towards design actions for understanding and working with the unruliness of the natural world in its manifold forms. We present a review of existing literature and an analysis of a selection of projects-in-progress from the CUBIC research group at Lancaster University, UK. In doing so, we aim to propose a new approach for how we think of, and design for, more-than-human future cities. Media architecture is core to this endeavour because we need to find new ways to communicate these new knowledges and contribute toward a better understanding of the complex issues of multispecies coexistence and flourishing. Far from providing an established framework or guidelines, we share this provocation from the outset as a catalyst for emerging collaboration and through which further open-ended questions can be explored.

References

  1. J. Beckett, City Status in the British Isles, 1830–2002, 1 edition. Aldershot, Hants, England ; Burlington, VT, USA: Routledge, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. D. Raskin, ‘Global scenarios: Background review for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment’, Ecosystems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 133–142, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10021-004-0074-2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. Sadler , The Little Book of Ecosystem Services in the City. ImaginationLancaster, Lancaster University, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. L. Tsing, J. Deger, A. Keleman Saxena, and F. Zhou, Eds., Feral atlas: the more-than-human anthropocene. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, Digital Projects Section, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Tega Brain, ‘The Environment is not a System’, RESEARCH VALUES 2018, Dec. 20, 2017. https://researchvalues2018.wordpress.com/2017/12/20/tega-brain-the-environment-is-not-a-system/ (accessed Jan. 09, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Memmott , ‘The Conservation of Ecological Interactions’, in Insect Conservation Biology: Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society's 23nd Symposium, CABI, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. L. Tsing, ‘On NonscalabilityThe Living World Is Not Amenable to Precision-Nested Scales’, Common Knowl., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 505–524, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1215/0961754X-1630424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Thackara, ‘Bioregioning: Pathways to Urban-Rural Reconnection’, She Ji J. Des. Econ. Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15–28, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Foth and G. Caldwell, ‘More-than-human media architecture’, in Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference, United States of America, 2018, pp. 66–75. Accessed: May 18, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/authorize?N673075Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H. A. Swanson, A. L. Tsing, N. Bubandt, and E. Gan, ‘Bodies tumbled into bodies’, in Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene, Minnesota, UNITED STATES: University of Minnesota Press, 2017, pp. M1–M12. Accessed: Jan. 20, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/lancaster/detail.action?docID=4745557Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. B. Harley and D. Woodward, Eds., The History of Cartography: Cartography in Prehistoric, Ancient and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean, Vol. 1. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Coulton, J. Huck, A. Gradinar, and L. Salinas, ‘Mapping the Beach Beneath the Street: Digital Cartography for the Playable City’, in Playable Cities: The City as a Digital Playground, A. Nijholt, Ed. Singapore: Springer, 2017, pp. 137–162. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1962-3_7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, ‘Morecambe Bay - Special Areas of Conservation’, JNCC. https://sac.jncc.gov.uk/site/UK0013027 (accessed Mar. 12, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Kark, ‘Effects of Ecotones on Biodiversity’, in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (Second Edition), S. A. Levin, Ed. Waltham: Academic Press, 2013, pp. 142–148. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00234-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. W. L. Koukkari and R. B. Sothern, ‘Chronobiometry: analyzing for rhythms’, Introd. Biol. Rhythms Primer Temporal Organ. Life Implic. Health Soc. Reprod. Nat. Environ., pp. 577–602, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. B. Krause, ‘Anatomy of the soundscape: evolving perspectives’, J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 56, no. 1/2, pp. 73–80, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R. Chepesiuk, Missing the dark: health effects of light pollution. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. K. J. Gaston, M. E. Visser, and F. Hölker, ‘The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge’, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., vol. 370, no. 1667, p. 20140133, May 2015, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. F. Sánchez-Bayo and K. A. G. Wyckhuys, ‘Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers’, Biol. Conserv., vol. 232, pp. 8–27, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. N. Dunn, Dark Matters: A Manifesto for the Nocturnal City. Winchester, UK Washington, USA: Zero Books, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 2T. Edensor, From Light to Dark: Daylight, Illumination, and Gloom, Illustrated edition. Minneapolis London: University Of Minnesota Press, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. Narboni, ‘Imagining The Future of the City At Night’, Architect, Feb. 15, 2017. https://www.architectmagazine.com/technology/lighting/imagining-the-future-of-the-city-at-night_o (accessed Jan. 20, 2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Rancière, The Politics of Aesthetics, Pbk. Ed edition. London ; New York: Continuum, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. N. Dunn and P. Cureton, Future Cities: A Visual Guide. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. Griffiths and N. Dunn, ‘More-than-human Nights: Intersecting lived experience and diurnal rhythms in the nocturnal city’, in ICNS Proceedings, Lisbon, 2020, pp. 203–220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 2A. Wiethoff and H. Hussmann, Media Architecture: Using Information and Media As Construction Material. Berlin/Boston, GERMANY: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2017. Accessed: May 18, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/lancaster/detail.action?docID=4812836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition, 1st edition. New York, London: Routledge, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. More-Than-Human Future Cities: From the design of nature to designing for and through nature.
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format