skip to main content
10.1145/3477495.3531836acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

AHP: Learning to Negative Sample for Hyperedge Prediction

Published:07 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hypergraphs (i.e., sets of hyperedges) naturally represent group relations (e.g., researchers co-authoring a paper and ingredients used together in a recipe), each of which corresponds to a hyperedge (i.e., a subset of nodes). Predicting future or missing hyperedges bears significant implications for many applications (e.g., collaboration and recipe recommendation). What makes hyperedge prediction particularly challenging is the vast number of non-hyperedge subsets, which grows exponentially with the number of nodes. Since it is prohibitive to use all of them as negative examples for model training, it is inevitable to sample a very small portion of them, and to this end, heuristic sampling schemes have been employed. However, trained models suffer from poor generalization capability for examples of different natures. In this paper, we propose AHP, an adversarial training-based hyperedge-prediction method. It learns to sample negative examples without relying on any heuristic schemes. Using six real hypergraphs, we show that AHP generalizes better to negative examples of various natures. It yields up to 28.2% higher AUROC than the best existing methods and often even outperforms its variants with sampling schemes tailored to test sets.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

SIGIR-sp1681.mp4

mp4

66.1 MB

References

  1. Ilya Amburg, Nate Veldt, and Austin Benson. 2020. Clustering in graphs and hypergraphs with categorical edge labels. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Martin Arjovsky and Léon Bottou. 2017. Towards principled methods for training generative adversarial networks. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. 2017. Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin R Benson, Rediet Abebe, Michael T Schaub, Ali Jadbabaie, and Jon Kleinberg. 2018. Simplicial closure and higher-order link prediction. PNAS 115, 48 (2018), E11221--E11230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Austin R Benson, Ravi Kumar, and Andrew Tomkins. 2018. Sequences of sets. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Minyoung Choe, Jaemin Yoo, Geon Lee, Woonsung Baek, U Kang, and Kijung Shin. 2022. MiDaS: Representative Sampling from Real-world Hypergraphs. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hyunjin Choo and Kijung Shin. 2022. On the Persistence of Higher-Order Interactions in Real-World Hypergraphs. In SDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cazamere Comrie and Jon Kleinberg. 2021. Hypergraph Ego-networks and Their Temporal Evolution. In ICDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Manh Tuan Do, Se-eun Yoon, Bryan Hooi, and Kijung Shin. 2020. Structural patterns and generative models of real-world hypergraphs. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yihe Dong, Will Sawin, and Yoshua Bengio. 2020. HNHN: Hypergraph networks with hyperedge neurons. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.12278 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yifan Feng, Haoxuan You, Zizhao Zhang, Rongrong Ji, and Yue Gao. 2019. Hypergraph neural networks. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Li He, Hongxu Chen, Dingxian Wang, Shoaib Jameel, Philip Yu, and Guandong Xu. 2021. Click-Through Rate Prediction with Multi-Modal Hypergraphs. In CIKM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ming Hou, Brahim Chaib-draa, Chao Li, and Qibin Zhao. 2018. Generative Adversarial Positive-Unlabelled Learning. In IJCAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wenpeng Hu, Ran Le, Bing Liu, Feng Ji, Jinwen Ma, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2021. Predictive Adversarial Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Leo Katz. 1953. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika 18, 1 (1953), 39--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2017. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ryuichi Kiryo, Gang Niu, Marthinus C Du Plessis, and Masashi Sugiyama. 2017. Positive-unlabeled learning with non-negative risk estimator. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yunbum Kook, Jihoon Ko, and Kijung Shin. 2020. Evolution of Real-world Hypergraphs: Patterns and Models without Oracles. In ICDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Geon Lee, Minyoung Choe, and Kijung Shin. 2021. How Do Hyperedges Overlap in Real-World Hypergraphs? - Patterns, Measures, and Generators. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Geon Lee, Jihoon Ko, and Kijung Shin. 2020. Hypergraph Motifs: Concepts, Algorithms, and Discoveries. PVLDB 13, 11 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Geon Lee and Kijung Shin. 2021. THyMe+: Temporal Hypergraph Motifs and Fast Algorithms for Exact Counting. In ICDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yicong Li, Hongxu Chen, Xiangguo Sun, Zhenchao Sun, Lin Li, Lizhen Cui, Philip S Yu, and Guandong Xu. 2021. Hyperbolic hypergraphs for sequential recommendation. In CIKM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. David Liben-Nowell and Jon Kleinberg. 2007. The link-prediction problem for social networks. JASIST 58, 7 (2007), 1019--1031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Zheng Liu, Xing Xie, and Lei Chen. 2018. Context-aware academic collaborator recommendation. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Byeonghu Na, Hyemi Kim, Kyungwoo Song, Weonyoung Joo, Yoon-Yeong Kim, and Il-Chul Moon. 2020. Deep generative positive-unlabeled learning under selection bias. In CIKM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Duc Anh Nguyen, Canh Hao Nguyen, and Hiroshi Mamitsuka. 2021. CentSmoothie: Central-Smoothing Hypergraph Neural Networks for Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07837 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Prasanna Patil, Govind Sharma, and M Narasimha Murty. 2020. Negative sampling for hyperlink prediction in networks. In PAKDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kevin Roth, Aurelien Lucchi, Sebastian Nowozin, and Thomas Hofmann. 2017. Stabilizing training of Generative Adversarial Networks through regularization. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoang Thanh-Tung, Svetha Venkatesh, and Truyen Tran. 2019. Improving generalization and stability of generative adversarial networks. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Thonet Thibaut, Renders Jean-Michel, Choi Mario, and Kim Jinho. 2022. Joint Personalized Search and Recommendation with Hypergraph Convolutional Networks. In ECIR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Leo Torres, Ann S Blevins, Danielle Bassett, and Tina Eliassi-Rad. 2021. The why, how, and when of representations for complex systems. SIAM Rev. 63, 3 (2021), 435--485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ke Tu, Peng Cui, Xiao Wang, Fei Wang, and Wenwu Zhu. 2018. Structural deep embedding for hyper-networks. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Maria Vaida and Kevin Purcell. 2019. Hypergraph link prediction: learning drug interaction networks embeddings. In ICMLA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Oriol Vinyals, Meire Fortunato, and Navdeep Jaitly. 2015. Pointer networks. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jianling Wang, Kaize Ding, Liangjie Hong, Huan Liu, and James Caverlee. 2020. Next-item recommendation with sequential hypergraphs. In SIGIR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Man Wu, Shirui Pan, Lan Du, Ivor Tsang, Xingquan Zhu, and Bo Du. 2019. Longshort distance aggregation networks for positive unlabeled graph learning. In CIKM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Naganand Yadati, Madhav Nimishakavi, Prateek Yadav, Vikram Nitin, Anand Louis, and Partha Talukdar. 2019. HyperGCN: A New Method For Training Graph Convolutional Networks on Hypergraphs. In NeurIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Naganand Yadati, Vikram Nitin, Madhav Nimishakavi, Prateek Yadav, Anand Louis, and Partha Talukdar. 2020. NHP: Neural Hypergraph Link Prediction. In CIKM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Se-eun Yoon, Hyungseok Song, Kijung Shin, and Yung Yi. 2020. How Much and When Do We Need Higher-order Information in Hypergraphs? A Case Study on Hyperedge Prediction. In WWW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Chia-An Yu, Ching-Lun Tai, Tak-Shing Chan, and Yi-Hsuan Yang. 2018. Modeling multi-way relations with hypergraph embedding. In CIKM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Junwei Zhang, Min Gao, Junliang Yu, Lei Guo, Jundong Li, and Hongzhi Yin. 2021. Double-Scale Self-Supervised Hypergraph Learning for Group Recommendation. In CIKM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Muhan Zhang, Zhicheng Cui, Shali Jiang, and Yixin Chen. 2018. Beyond link prediction: Predicting hyperlinks in adjacency space. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruochi Zhang, Yuesong Zou, and Jian Ma. 2020. Hyper-SAGNN: a self-attention based graph neural network for hypergraphs. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Yao Zhou, Jianpeng Xu, Jun Wu, Zeinab Taghavi, Evren Korpeoglu, Kannan Achan, and Jingrui He. 2021. PURE: Positive-Unlabeled Recommendation with Generative Adversarial Network. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. AHP: Learning to Negative Sample for Hyperedge Prediction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '22: Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
        July 2022
        3569 pages
        ISBN:9781450387323
        DOI:10.1145/3477495

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 July 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader