Maurice Jakesch
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Political organizations worldwide keep innovating their use of social media technologies. In the 2019 Indian general election, organizers used a network of WhatsApp groups to manipulate Twitter trends through coordinated mass postings. We joined 600 WhatsApp groups that support the Bharatiya Janata Party, the right-wing party that won the general election, to investigate these campaigns. We found evidence of 75 hashtag manipulation campaigns in the form of mobilization messages with lists of pre-written tweets. Building on this evidence, we estimate the campaigns' size, describe their organization and determine whether they succeeded in creating controlled social media narratives. Our findings show that the campaigns produced hundreds of nationwide Twitter trends throughout the election. Centrally controlled but voluntary in participation, this hybrid configuration of technologies and organizational strategies shows how profoundly online tools transform campaign politics. Trend alerts complicate the debates over the legitimate use of digital tools for political participation and may have provided a blueprint for participatory media manipulation by a party with popular support.
- Saifuddin Ahmed, Kokil Jaidka, and Jaeho Cho. 2016. The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter: A comparison of campaign strategies of political parties. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 33, 4 (2016), 1071--1087.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow, and Chuan Yu. 2019. Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics, Vol. 6, 2 (2019), 2053168019848554.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert D Benford and David A Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual review of sociology, Vol. 26, 1 (2000), 611--639.Google Scholar
- W Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. 2011. Digital media and the personalization of collective action: Social technology and the organization of protests against the global economic crisis. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 14, 6 (2011), 770--799.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, communication & society, Vol. 15, 5 (2012), 739--768.Google Scholar
- Alessandro Bessi and Emilio Ferrara. 2016. Social bots distort the 2016 US Presidential election online discussion. First Monday, Vol. 21, 11--7 (2016).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Samantha Bradshaw and Philip Howard. 2017. Troops, trolls and troublemakers: A global inventory of organized social media manipulation. (2017).Google Scholar
- Samantha Bradshaw and Philip N Howard. 2019. The global disinformation order: 2019 global inventory of organised social media manipulation. Project on Computational Propaganda.Google Scholar
- Andrew Chadwick. 2017. The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Paula Chakravartty and Srirupa Roy. 2015. Mr. Modi goes to Delhi: Mediated populism and the 2014 Indian elections. Television & New Media, Vol. 16, 4 (2015), 311--322.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anumeha Chaturvedi. 2017. How India emerged as Twitter's fastest growing market in terms of daily active users. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/interviews/india-became-our-number-one-market-in-daily-users-twitters-new-india-director-taranjeet-singh/articleshow/58601906.cmsGoogle Scholar
- Swati Chaturvedi. 2016. I am a troll: Inside the secret world of the BJP's digital army. Juggernaut Books.Google Scholar
- Anupam Das and Ralph Schroeder. 2020. Online disinformation in the run-up to the Indian 2019 election. Information, Communication & Society (2020), 1--17.Google Scholar
- Pranav Dixit. 2017. Here's How People In India Are Manipulating Twitter Trends To Spread Political Propaganda. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pranavdixit/political-propaganda-in-india-twitter-trends-hashtagsGoogle Scholar
- Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM, Vol. 59, 7 (2016), 96--104.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sumit Ganguly. 9247. India's Democracy Is Under Threat. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/18/indias-democracy-is-under-threat/Google Scholar
- Kiran Garimella and Dean Eckles. 2020. Images and Misinformation in Political Groups: Evidence from WhatsApp in India. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review (2020).Google Scholar
- Kiran Garimella and Gareth Tyson. 2018. WhatsApp, Doc? A First Look at WhatsApp Public Group Data. In ICWSM. 511--518.Google Scholar
- Tarleton Gillespie. 2010. The politics of ?platforms'. New media & society, Vol. 12, 3 (2010), 347--364.Google Scholar
- Tarleton Gillespie. 2012. Can an algorithm be wrong? Limn, Vol. 1, 2 (2012).Google Scholar
- Vindu Goel. 2018. In India, Facebook's WhatsApp Plays Central Role in Elections. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/14/technology/whatsapp-india-elections.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Vindu Goel, Jeffrey Gettleman, and Saumya Khandelwal. 2020. Under Modi, India's Press Is Not So Free Anymore. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/02/world/asia/modi-india-press-media.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Nir Grinberg, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, Briony Swire-Thompson, and David Lazer. 2019. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Science, Vol. 363, 6425 (2019), 374--378.Google Scholar
- Gabriel Emile Hine, Jeremiah Onaolapo, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nicolas Kourtellis, Ilias Leontiadis, Riginos Samaras, Gianluca Stringhini, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2017. Kek, cucks, and god emperor trump: A measurement study of 4chan's politically incorrect forum and its effects on the web. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Philip N Howard and Bence Kollanyi. 2016. Bots,# StrongerIn, and# Brexit: computational propaganda during the UK-EU referendum. Available at SSRN 2798311 (2016).Google Scholar
- Suhauna Hussain and Jeff Bercovici. 2020. Twitter is suspending 70 pro-Bloomberg accounts, citing 'platform manipulation'. https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2020-02--21/twitter-suspends-bloomberg-accountsGoogle Scholar
- Caroline Jack. 2017. Lexicon of lies: Terms for problematic information. Data & Society, Vol. 3 (2017).Google Scholar
- Christophe Jaffrelot. 2015. The Modi-centric BJP 2014 election campaign: New techniques and old tactics. Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 23, 2 (2015), 151--166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christophe Jaffrelot and Gilles Verniers. 2020. The BJP's 2019 election campaign: not business as usual. Contemporary South Asia (2020), 1--23.Google Scholar
- J Craig Jenkins. 1983. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual review of sociology, Vol. 9, 1 (1983), 527--553.Google Scholar
- David Karpf. 2012. The MoveOn effect: The unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Franziska B Keller, David Schoch, Sebastian Stier, and JungHwan Yang. 2017. How to manipulate social media: Analyzing political astroturfing using ground truth data from South Korea. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Franziska B Keller, David Schoch, Sebastian Stier, and JungHwan Yang. 2020. Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to coordinate a disinformation Campaign. Political Communication, Vol. 37, 2 (2020), 256--280.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tarunabh Khaitan. 2020. Killing a Constitution with a Thousand Cuts: Executive Aggrandizement and Party-state Fusion in India. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, Vol. 14, 1 (2020), 49--95.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gary King, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret E Roberts. 2017. How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. American political science review, Vol. 111, 3 (2017), 484--501.Google Scholar
- Sanjay Kumar and Pranav Kumar. 2018. How widespread is WhatsApp's usage in India? https://www.livemint.com/Technology/O6DLmIibCCV5luEG9XuJWL/How-widespread-is-WhatsApps-usage-in-India.htmlGoogle Scholar
- David MJ Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, et al. 2018. The science of fake news. Science, Vol. 359, 6380 (2018), 1094--1096.Google Scholar
- Aaron Mak. 2017. Twitter Is Shutting Down a Conservative Group's Automated Tweets. http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/10/17/twitter_has_labeled_a_conservative_group_s_automated_tweets_as_spam.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Helen Margetts, Peter John, Scott Hale, and Taha Yasseri. 2015. Political turbulence: How social media shape collective action. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Stefania Milan. 2015. Mobilizing in Times of Social Media. From a Politics of Identity to a Politics of Visibility. Milan, Stefania (2015). Mobilizing in Times of Social Media. From a Politics of Identity to a Politics of Visibility. In Critical Perspectives on Social Media and Protest, edited by Dencik and Leistert, Rowman & Littlefield (2015), 53--71.Google Scholar
- Madhumita Murgia. 2019. India: The WhatsApp Election. https://www.ft.com/content/9fe88fba-6c0d-11e9-a9a5--351eeaef6d84Google Scholar
- Nic Newman, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2019. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
- Taberez Ahmed Neyazi, Anup Kumar, and Holli A Semetko. 2016. Campaigns, digital media, and mobilization in India. The International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 21, 3 (2016), 398--416.Google Scholar
- Ben Nimmo. 2019. Measuring Traffic Manipulation on Twitter.Google Scholar
- Joyojeet Pal. 2019. The Making of a Technocrat. Global Digital Cultures: Perspectives from South Asia (2019), 163.Google Scholar
- Joyojeet Pal and Anmol Panda. 2019. Twitter in the 2019 Indian General Elections: Trends of Use Across States and Parties. In Economic and Political Weekly.Google Scholar
- Anmol Panda, A'ndre Gonawela, Sreangsu Acharyya, Dibyendu Mishra, Mugdha Mohapatra, Ramgopal Chandrasekaran, and Joyojeet Pal. 2020. NivaDuck-A Scalable Pipeline to Build a Database of Political Twitter Handles for India and the United States. In International Conference on Social Media and Society. 200--209.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shruti Phadke and Tanushree Mitra. 2020. Many Faced Hate: A Cross Platform Study of Content Framing and Information Sharing by Online Hate Groups. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benson Rajan. 2019. New Mythologies of Fake News: WhatsApp and Misrepresented Scientific Achievements of Ancient India. In Handbook of Research on Deception, Fake News, and Misinformation Online. IGI Global, 192--208.Google Scholar
- Himanshu Rajput. 2014. Social media and politics in India: A study on Twitter usage among Indian Political Leaders. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Vol. 2, 1 (2014), 63--69.Google Scholar
- Jacob Ratkiewicz, Michael D Conover, Mark Meiss, Bruno Goncc alves, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer Menczer. 2011. Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media. In Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.Google Scholar
- Jon Russell. 2019. Manipulating an Indian politician's tweets is worryingly easy to do. https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/13/india-politician-tweetsGoogle Scholar
- Michael Safi. 2019. India election results 2019: Modi claims landslide victory. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/23/india-election-results-narendra-modi-bjp-victoryGoogle Scholar
- Divya Shekhar. 2019. Hashtag battle: Inside the BJP and Congress social media war rooms. https://www.forbesindia.com/article/poll-vault/hashtag-battle-inside-the-bjp-and-congress-social-media-war-rooms/52881/1Google Scholar
- Clay Shirky. 2008. Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin.Google Scholar
- Manish Singh. 2019. WhatsApp reaches 400 million users in India, its biggest market. https://techcrunch.com/2019/07/26/whatsapp-india-users-400-million/Google Scholar
- Subir Sinha. 2018. Fragile hegemony: Modi, social media and competitive electoral populism in India. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 11, 2017 (2018), 4158--4180.Google Scholar
- Kate Starbird, Ahmer Arif, and Tom Wilson. 2019. Disinformation as collaborative work: Surfacing the participatory nature of strategic information operations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2012. (How) will the revolution be retweeted? Information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. In Proceedings of the acm 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 7--16.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sidney G Tarrow. 2011. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Charles Tilly. 2004. Social Movements, 1768-2004. Paradigm, Boulder (2004).Google Scholar
- Saumya Tiwari. 2019. Data check: 45 million new, young voters could play a key role in 2019 elections. https://scroll.in/article/913411/data-check-45-million-new-young-voters-could-play-a-key-role-in-2019-electionsGoogle Scholar
- Mark Tremayne. 2014. Anatomy of protest in the digital era: A network analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies, Vol. 13, 1 (2014), 110--126.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Avinash Tulasi, Kanay Gupta, Omkar Gurjar, Sathvik Sanjeev Buggana, Paras Mehan, Arun Balaji Buduru, and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 2019. Catching up with trends: The changing landscape of political discussions on twitter in 2014 and 2019. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.07144 (2019).Google Scholar
- Sahana Udupa. 2015. Internet Hindus. Handbook of religion and the Asian city/: aspiration and urbanization in the twenty-first century (2015).Google Scholar
- Sahana Udupa. 2019. Nationalism in the digital age: Fun as a metapractice of extreme speech. International Journal of Communication (2019), 3143--3163.Google Scholar
- Edward T Walker. 2014. Grassroots for hire: Public affairs consultants in American democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tom Wilson and Kate Starbird. 2020. Cross-platform disinformation campaigns: lessons learned and next steps. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, Vol. 1, 1 (2020).Google Scholar
- Samuel C Woolley and Philip N Howard. 2018. Computational propaganda: political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Volker Wulf, Kaoru Misaki, Meryem Atam, David Randall, and Markus Rohde. 2013. 'On the ground'in Sidi Bouzid: investigating social media use during the tunisian revolution. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 1409--1418.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiaofeng Yang, Qian Yang, and Christo Wilson. 2015. Penny for Your Thoughts : Searching for the 50 Cent Party on Sina Weibo. In Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google Scholar
- Savvas Zannettou, Tristan Caulfield, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Michael Sirivianos, Gianluca Stringhini, and Guillermo Suarez-Tangil. 2018. On the origins of memes by means of fringe web communities. In IMC. ACM.Google Scholar
- Savvas Zannettou, Tristan Caulfield, William Setzer, Michael Sirivianos, Gianluca Stringhini, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2019. Who let the trolls out? towards understanding state-sponsored trolls. In Proceedings of the 10th acm conference on web science. 353--362.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jerry Zhang, Darrell Carpenter, and Myung Ko. 2013. Online astroturfing: A theoretical perspective. (2013).Google Scholar
- Yubao Zhang, Xin Ruan, Haining Wang, Hui Wang, and Su He. 2016. Twitter trends manipulation: a first look inside the security of twitter trending. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, Vol. 12, 1 (2016), 144--156.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Trend Alert: A Cross-Platform Organization Manipulated Twitter Trends in the Indian General Election
Recommendations
The 2014 Indian general election on Twitter: an analysis of changing political traditions
ICTD '15: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and DevelopmentThis study investigates how politicians and citizens cooperate to create an e-democracy based on information dissemination and political awareness in an ICT environment, especially during elections. This research is conducted in the Indian context, ...
The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter
The study examines Twitter political campaigns in the 2014 Indian general election.It also examines the role of internet and first time voters in electoral success.New-and-upcoming parties used Twitter for self-promotion and media validation.The winning ...
How Do Online Citizens Persuade Fellow Voters? Using Twitter During the 2012 Dutch Parliamentary Election Campaign
This article explores how Twitter was used by voters to participate in electoral campaigning during the Dutch election campaign of 2012. New social media networks like Twitter are believed to be efficient tools of communication between electoral ...
Comments