skip to main content
research-article

Reinforcement Learning-Based MAC Protocol for Underwater Multimedia Sensor Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 September 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

High propagation delay, high error probability, floating node mobility, and low data rates are the key challenges for Underwater Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks (UMWSNs). In this article, we propose RL-MAC, a Reinforcement Learning (RL)–based Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol for multimedia sensing in an Underwater Acoustic Network (UAN) environment. The proposed scheme uses Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) for relay nodes in a multi-hop network for improved efficiency concerning the mobility of the relays and sensor nodes. The access point (AP) and relay nodes calculate traffic demands from the initial contention of the sensor nodes. Our solution uses Q-learning to enhance the contention mechanism at the initial phase of multimedia transmission. Based on the traffic demands, RL-MAC allocates TXOP duration for the uplink multimedia reception. Further, the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) and compression techniques are used for calculating the image quality at the receiver end and reducing the image at the destination, respectively. We implement a prototype of the proposed scheme over an off-the-shelf, low-cost hardware setup. Moreover, extensive simulation over NS-3 shows a significant packet delivery ratio and throughput compared with the existing state-of-the-art.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] 2011. Quality aware image transmission over underwater multimedia sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 9, 7 (2011), 12871301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Alfouzan Faisal, Shahrabi Alireza, Ghoreyshi Seyed Mohammad, and Boutaleb Tuleen. 2016. Performance comparison of sender-based and receiver-based scheduling MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks. In 19th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS’16). IEEE, 99106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Alfouzan Faisal, Shahrabi Alireza, Ghoreyshi Seyed Mohammad, and Boutaleb Tuleen. 2017. Efficient depth-based scheduling MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks. In 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN’17). IEEE, 827832.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Alfouzan Faisal, Shahrabi Alireza, Ghoreyshi Seyed Mohammad, and Boutaleb Tuleen. 2019. A comparative performance evaluation of distributed collision-free MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks. In SENSORNETS. 8593.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Awais Muhammad, Javaid Nadeem, Naseer Nidal, and Imran Muhammad. 2019. Exploiting energy efficient routing protocols for void hole alleviation in IoT enabled underwater WSN. In 15th International Wireless Communications Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC’19). 17971802. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Banluta Jenith L., Balbuena Lilet D., Tiglao Nestor Michael C., and Pedrasa Jhoanna Rhodette I.. 2017. Comparison of contention-based MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks. In International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN’17). IEEE, 518523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Bouabdallah Fatma, Boutaba Raouf, Mehaoua Ahmed, et al. 2018. Collision avoidance energy efficient multi-channel MAC protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 18, 10 (2018), 22982314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Byun JungHun, Park Jin Hoon, and Jo Ohyun. 2020. Deep learning based BER prediction model in underwater IoT networks. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology 10, 6 (2020), 4148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Carbonelli Cecilia and Mitra Urbashi. 2006. Cooperative multihop communication for underwater acoustic networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks. 97100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Chen W., Guan Q., Yu H., Ji F., and Chen F.. 2021. Medium access control under space-time coupling in underwater acoustic networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2021), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Deng Min, Chen Huifang, and Xie Lei. 2018. DCO-MAC: A hybrid MAC protocol for data collection in underwater acoustic sensor networks. Sensors 18, 7 (2018), 2300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Dugaev Dmitrii, Peng Zheng, Luo Yu, and Pu Lina. 2020. Reinforcement-learning based dynamic transmission range adjustment in medium access control for underwater wireless sensor networks. Electronics 9, 10 (2020), 1727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Fan Guangyu, Chen Huifang, Xie Lei, and Wang Kuang. 2013. A hybrid reservation-based MAC protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 11, 3 (2013), 11781192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Fan Qiang, Fan Jing, Li Jie, and Wang Xiaofang. 2012. A multi-hop energy-efficient sleeping MAC protocol based on TDMA scheduling for wireless mesh sensor networks. Journal of Networks 7, 9 (2012), 13551361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Gazi Firoj, Misra Sudip, Ahmed Nurzaman, Mukherjee Anandarup, and Kumar Neeraj. 2020. UnRest: Underwater reliable acoustic communication for multimedia streaming. In IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM’20). IEEE, 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Geng Xuan and Zheng Y. Rosa. 2019. MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks based on deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Hajenko T. J. and Benson C. R.. 2010. The high frequency underwater acoustic channel. In OCEANS. IEEE, 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Han Seongwon, Noh Youngtae, Lee Uichin, and Gerla Mario. 2019. Optical-acoustic hybrid network toward real-time video streaming for mobile underwater sensors. Ad Hoc Networks 83 (2019), 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Hyder Waheed, Nadeem Adnan, Basit Abdul, Rizwan Kashif, Ahsan Kamran, and Mehmood Nadeem. 2017. A review and classification of energy efficient MAC protocols for underwater wireless sensor network. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 13 (2017), 6370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Jin Zhigang, Zhao Qinyi, and Su Yishan. 2019. RCAR: A reinforcement-learning-based routing protocol for congestion-avoided underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal 19, 22 (2019), 1088110891.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Raj Delphin, Lee Jinyoung, Ko Eunbi, Shin Soo-Young, Namgung Jung-Il, Yum Sun-Ho, and Park Soo-Hyun. 2020. Underwater network management system in Internet of Underwater Things: Open challenges, benefits, and feasible solution. Electronics 9, 7 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Karim Lutful, Mahmoud Qusay H., Nasser Nidal, Anpalagan Alagan, and Khan Nargis. 2017. Localization in terrestrial and underwater sensor-based M2M communication networks: Architecture, classification and challenges. International Journal of Communication Systems 30, 4 (2017), e2997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Khorov Evgeny, Lyakhov Andrey, Krotov Alexander, and Guschin Andrey. 2015. A survey on IEEE 802.11 ah: An enabling networking technology for smart cities. Computer Communications 58 (2015), 5369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Kim Hee-won, Im Tae Ho, and Cho Ho-Shin. 2018. UCMAC: A cooperative MAC protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors 18, 6 (2018), 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Larkin Kieran Gerard. 2015. Structural similarity index SSIMplified: Is there really a simpler concept at the heart of image quality measurement?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.06680 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Liu Meiqin, Huang Weikun, Qian Liangfang, and Zhang Senlin. 2016. An improved R-MAC based MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. In IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC’16). IEEE, 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Martin Robert, Zhu Yibo, Pu Lina, Dou Fei, Peng Zheng, Cui Jun-Hong, and Rajasekaran Sanguthevar. 2015. Aqua-sim next generation: A NS-3 based simulator for underwater sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems. Springer, 12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. [28] Nam Heungwoo and An Sunshin. 2007. An ultrasonic sensor based low-power acoustic modem for underwater communication in underwater wireless sensor networks. In International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 494504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Park Sung Hyun, Mitchell Paul Daniel, and Grace David. 2018. Performance of the ALOHA-Q MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. In International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering (iCCECE’18). IEEE, 189194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Park Sung Hyun, Mitchell Paul Daniel, and Grace David. 2019. Reinforcement learning based MAC protocol (UW-ALOHA-Q) for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 165531165542.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Park Sung Hyun, Mitchell Paul Daniel, and Grace David. 2020. Reinforcement learning based MAC protocol (UW-ALOHA-QM) for mobile underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access (2020), 5906–5919.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32] Renner Bernd-Christian, Heitmann Jan, and Steinmetz Fabian. 2020. ahoi: Inexpensive, low-power communication and localization for underwater sensor networks and \( \mu \)AUVs. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 16, 2 (2020), 146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. [33] Roy Alak and Sarma Nityananda. 2021. A synchronous duty-cycled reservation based MAC protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Digital Communications and Networks 7, 3 (2021), 385–398. DOI:.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Stojanovic Milica. 2007. On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 11, 4 (2007), 3443.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. [35] Thorp William H.. 1967. Analytic description of the low-frequency attenuation coefficient. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42, 1 (1967), 270270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Ullah SM. 2019. A robust energy efficient MAC protocol design for Underwater sensor network. Ph.D. Dissertation. Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Wang Lijuan, Du Xiujuan, Liu Xiuxiu, Li Chong, and Lan ShengLin. 2018. Design and implementation of state-based MAC protocol for UANs in real testbed. In OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston. IEEE, 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Wang Zhou, Bovik Alan C., Sheikh Hamid R., and Simoncelli Eero P.. 2004. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 4 (2004), 600612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. [39] Xiao Liang, Jiang Donghua, Chen Ye, Su Wei, and Tang Yuliang. 2019. Reinforcement-learning-based relay mobility and power allocation for underwater sensor networks against jamming. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 45, 3 (2019), 11481156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Ye Xiaowen, Yu Yiding, and Fu Liqun. 2022. Deep reinforcement learning based MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 21, 5 (2022), 1625–1638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. [41] Ye Xiaowen, Yu Yiding, and Fu Liqun. 2020. Deep reinforcement learning based MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2020), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Zhang Ziwei, Shi Wei, Niu Qiuna, Guo Ying, Wizeang Jingjing, and Luo Hanjiang. 2019. A load-based hybrid MAC protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 104542104552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Zhuo Xiaoxiao, Liu Meiyan, Wei Yan, Yu Guanding, Qu Fengzhong, and Sun Rui. 2020. AUV-aided energy-efficient data collection in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7, 10 (2020), 1001010022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Reinforcement Learning-Based MAC Protocol for Underwater Multimedia Sensor Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format