skip to main content
research-article

Quarantined! Examining the Effects of a Community-Wide Moderation Intervention on Reddit

Published:31 March 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Should social media platforms override a community’s self-policing when it repeatedly break rules? What actions can they consider? In light of this debate, platforms have begun experimenting with softer alternatives to outright bans. We examine one such intervention called quarantining, that impedes direct access to and promotion of controversial communities. Specifically, we present two case studies of what happened when Reddit quarantined the influential communities r/TheRedPill (TRP) and r/The_Donald (TD). Using over 85M Reddit posts, we apply causal inference methods to examine the quarantine’s effects on TRP and TD. We find that the quarantine made it more difficult to recruit new members: new user influx to TRP and TD decreased by 79.5% and 58%, respectively. Despite quarantining, existing users’ misogyny and racism levels remained unaffected. We conclude by reflecting on the effectiveness of this design friction in limiting the influence of toxic communities and discuss broader implications for content moderation.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Allison Kimberley and Bussey Kay. 2020. Communal quirks and circlejerks: A taxonomy of processes contributing to insularity in online communities. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 14. 1223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Archetti Cristina. 2013. Terrorism, Communication, and the media. In Proceedings of the Understanding Terrorism in the Age of Global Media. Springer, 3259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Asthana Sumit and Halfaker Aaron. 2018. With few eyes, all hoaxes are deep. Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), Article 21, 18 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] BBC. 2019. Reddit places pro-Donald-Trump forum in quarantine. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-48783866.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Bernal James Lopez, Cummins Steven, and Gasparrini Antonio. 2017. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: A tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology 46, 1 (2017), 348355.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Brainard L. A.. 2009. Cyber-communities. International Encyclopedia of Civil Society, Springer, 587600.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Buntain Cody and Golbeck Jennifer. 2014. Identifying social roles in reddit using network structure. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 615620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Carlson Caitlin Ring, Cousineau Luc, and Carlson Caitlin Ring. 2020. Are you sure you want to view this community? exploring the ethics of reddit’s quarantine practice. Journal of Media Ethics 00, 00 (2020), 112. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Cecchinato Marta E., Cox Anna L., and Bird Jon. 2015. Working 9-5? professional differences in email and boundary management practices. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 39893998. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Centivany Alissa and Glushko Bobby. 2016. “Popcorn Tastes Good” participatory policymaking and reddit’s. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 11261137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] Chandrasekharan Eshwar, Gandhi Chaitrali, Mustelier Matthew Wortley, and Gilbert Eric. 2019. Crossmod: A cross-community learning-based system to assist reddit moderators. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. [12] Chandrasekharan Eshwar and Gilbert Eric. 2019. Hybrid approaches to detect comments violating macro norms on reddit. arXiv:1904.03596. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.03596.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Chandrasekharan Eshwar, Pavalanathan Umashanthi, Srinivasan Anirudh, Glynn Adam, Eisenstein Jacob, and Gilbert Eric. 2017. You can’t stay here: The efficacy of reddit’s 2015 ban examined through hate speech. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Chandrasekharan Eshwar, Samory Mattia, Jhaver Shagun, Charvat Hunter, Bruckman Amy, Lampe Cliff, Eisenstein Jacob, and Gilbert Eric. 2018. The internet’s hidden rules: An empirical study of reddit norm violations at micro, meso, and macro scales. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Chemaly Soraya. 2015. Mass killings in the US: Masculinity, masculinity, masculinity. The Huffington Post (2015). Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mass-killings-in-the-us-w_b_8234322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Cheng Justin, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil Cristian, and Leskovec Jure. 2015. Antisocial behavior in online discussion communities. In Proceedings of the 9h International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Cheng Qijin and Yom-Tov Elad. 2019. Do search engine helpline notices aid in preventing suicide? analysis of archival data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, 3 (2019), e12235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Collins Patricia Hill. 2004. Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Connell Robert William. 2005. Masculinities. Polity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Courtenay Will H.. 2000. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine 50, 10 (2000), 13851401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Cousineau Luc S.. 2020. Displaced discussion: The implications of reddit quarantine and the movement of TheRedPill to self-hosting. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Cox Anna L., Gould Sandy J. J., Cecchinato Marta E., Iacovides Ioanna, and Renfree Ian. 2016. Design frictions for mindful interactions: The case for microboundaries. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 13891397. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Dewey Caitlin. 2014. Inside the ‘manosphere’ that inspired santa barbara shooter elliot rodger. The Washington Post (2014). Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2014/05/27/inside-the-manosphere-that-inspired-santa-barbara-shooter-elliot-rodger/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Farrell Tracie, Fernandez Miriam, Novotny Jakub, and Alani Harith. 2019. Exploring misogyny across the manosphere in reddit. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science (2019), 87–96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Flores-Saviaga Claudia, Keegan Brian C., and Savage Saiph. 2018. Mobilizing the trump train: Understanding collective action in a political trolling community. In Proceedings of the International 12th AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Garkey Ollie. 2016. Elliot rodger, gunman in california mass shooting, was influenced by the men’s rights movement. Daily Kos (2016). Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2014/05/24/1301671/-Elliot-Roger-Gunman-in-California-Mass-Shooting-was-influenced-by-the-Men-s-Rights-Movement.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Garrett R. Kelly. 2009. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 2 (2009), 265285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Gerrard Ysabel. 2018. Beyond the hashtag: Circumventing content moderation on social media. New Media & Society 20, 12 (2018), 44924511. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Gillespie Tarleton. 2015. Platforms intervene. Social Media+ Society 1, 1 (2015), 2056305115580479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Gillespie Tarleton. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [31] Gillespie Tarleton. 2020. Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale. Big Data and Society 7, 2 (2020), 205395172094323. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Gilmour David. 2017. 4chan and Reddit users set out to prove Seth Rich murder conspiracy. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/reddit-the-donald-4chan-seth-rich-murder.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Ging Debbie. 2019. Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities 22, 4 (2019), 638657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Glaser April. 2018. Want a Terrible Job? Facebook and Google May Be Hiring. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://slate.com/technology/2018/01/facebook-and-google-are-building-an-army-of-content-moderators-for-2018.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Gorwa Robert, Binns Reuben, and Katzenbach Christian. 2020. Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data and Society 7, 1 (2020). DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Grimmelmann James. 2015. The virtues of moderation. Yale JL & Tech. 17 (2015), 42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Hesterberg Tim, Moore David S., Monaghan Shaun, Clipson Ashley, and Epstein Rachel. 2005. Bootstrap methods and permutation tests. Introduction to the Practice of Statistics 5 (2005), 170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Hudson Laura. 2018. The internet is enabling a community of men who want to kill women. They need to be stopped. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/25/17279294/toronto-massacre-minassian-incels-internet-misogyny.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. [39] Hunte Zhane. 2019. “Female Nature, Cucks, and Simps”: Understanding Men Going Their Own Way as part of the Manosphere. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1331052&dswid=7939.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] Im Jane, Tandon Sonali, Chandrasekharan Eshwar, Denby Taylor, and Gilbert Eric. 2020. Synthesized social signals: Computationally-derived social signals from account histories. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Jamieson Kathleen Hall and Cappella Joseph N.. 2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. [42] Jansen Sue Curry and Martin Brian. 2015. The streisand effect and censorship backfire. International Journal of Communication 9, 1 (2015), 656–671.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. [43] Jhaver Shagun, Appling Darren Scott, Gilbert Eric, and Bruckman Amy. 2019. “Did You Suspect the Post Would Be Removed?”: Understanding user reactions to content removals on reddit. Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), Article 192, 33 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. [44] Jhaver Shagun, Birman Iris, Gilbert Eric, and Bruckman Amy. 2019. Human-Machine collaboration for content regulation: The case of reddit automoderator. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26, 5 (July 2019), Article 31, 35 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. [45] Jhaver Shagun, Boylston Christian, Yang Diyi, and Bruckman Amy. 2021. Evaluating the effectiveness of deplatforming as a moderation strategy on twitter. Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW (2021), Article 381, 30 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Jhaver Shagun, Bruckman Amy, and Gilbert Eric. 2019. Does transparency in moderation really matter? User behavior after content removal explanations on reddit. Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), Article 150, 27 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. [47] Jhaver Shagun, Chan Larry, and Bruckman Amy. 2018. The view from the other side: The border between controversial speech and harassment on kotaku in action. First Monday 23, 2 (2018). Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/8232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Jhaver Shagun, Chen Quan Ze, Knauss Detlef, and Zhang Amy X.. 2022. Designing Word Filter Tools for Creator-led Comment Moderation. (2022). Last access date is 2022-01-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. [49] Jhaver Shagun, Frey Seth, and Zhang Amy. 2022. Decentralizing Platform Power: A Design Space of Multi-level Governance in Online Social Platforms. arXiv:2108.12529. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12529.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. [50] Jhaver Shagun, Ghoshal Sucheta, Bruckman Amy, and Gilbert Eric. 2018. Online harassment and content moderation: The case of blocklists. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions 25, 2 (March 2018), Article 12, 33 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. [51] Johnson Deborah G.. 1997. Ethics online. Communication of the ACM 40, 1 (1997), 6065.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. [52] Jones Ridley, Colusso Lucas, Reinecke Katharina, and Hsieh Gary. 2019. R/Science: Challenges and opportunities in online science communication. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. [53] Kay Matthew, Nelson Gregory L., and Hekler Eric B.. 2016. Researcher-centered design of statistics: Why bayesian statistics better fit the culture and incentives of HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 45214532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. [54] Kelly Annie. 2017. The alt-right: Reactionary rehabilitation for white masculinity. Soundings 66, 66 (2017), 6878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. [55] Kiesler Sara, Kraut Robert, and Resnick Paul. 2012. Regulating behavior in online communities. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. [56] Koebler Jason. 2016. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/53d5xb/what-is-rthedonald-donald-trump-subreddit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. [57] Langås Helene Odden. 2019. “Have ya Seen Some of the Women We Gotta Rape?”: Exploring Discourses on Rape in an Antifeminist Internet Forum. Master’s thesis. University of Oslo, Blindern, Norway.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. [58] Lyons Matthew N.. 2017. Ctrl-alt-delete: The origins and ideology of the alternative right. Somerville, MA: Political Research Associates, January 20 (2017), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. [59] Madrigal Alexis. 2018. Inside Facebook’s Fast-Growing Content-Moderation Effort. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/02/what-facebook-told-insiders-about-how-it-moderates-posts/552632/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. [60] Mariconti Enrico, Suarez-Tangil Guillermo, Blackburn Jeremy, Cristofaro Emiliano De, Kourtellis Nicolas, Leontiadis Ilias, Serrano Jordi Luque, and Stringhini Gianluca. 2019. “You Know What to Do” proactive detection of youtube videos targeted by coordinated hate attacks. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. [61] Marwick Alice E. and Caplan Robyn. 2018. Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies 18, 4 (2018), 543559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Massachs Joan, Monti Corrado, Morales Gianmarco De Francisci, and Bonchi Francesco. 2020. Roots of trumpism: Homophily and social feedbackin donald trump support on reddit. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM, New York, NY, 4958. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. [63] Massanari Adrienne. 2017. # Gamergate and the fappening: How reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society 19, 3 (2017), 329346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. [64] Matias J. Nathan. 2016. Going dark: Social factors in collective action against platform operators in the Reddit blackout. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 11381151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. [65] Matias J. Nathan and Mou Merry. 2018. CivilServant: Community-led experiments in platform governance. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. [66] Mejtoft Thomas, Hale Sarah, and Söderström Ulrik. 2019. Design friction. In Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 4144. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. [67] Morgan Jonathan T., Bouterse Siko, Walls Heather, and Stierch Sarah. 2013. Tea and sympathy: Crafting positive new user experiences on wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York, NY, 839848. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. [68] Mountford Joseph. 2018. Topic modeling the red pill. Social Sciences 7, 3 (2018), 42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. [69] Nagle Angela. 2015. An Investigation into Contemporary Online Anti-Feminist Movements. Ph.D. Dissertation. Dublin City University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. [70] Neumann Peter R.. 2013. Options and strategies for countering online radicalization in the United States. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36, 6 (2013), 431459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. [71] Ohlheiser Abby. 2016. Fearing yet another witch hunt, Reddit bans ‘Pizzagate’. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.washing-tonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/11/23/fearing-yet-another-witch-hunt-reddit-bans-pizzagate/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. [72] Olteanu Alexandra, Castillo Carlos, Boy Jeremy, and Varshney Kush. 2018. The effect of extremist violence on hateful speech online. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. [73] Ostrom Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. [74] Pariser Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. [75] Peck Robert. 2017. The Hate Fueled Rise of r/The_Donald-and Its Epic Takedown. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.wired.com/story/the-hate-fueled-rise-of-rthe-donald-and-its-epic-takedown/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. [76] Peretz Tal. 2016. Why study men and masculinities? A theorized research review. Graduate Journal of Social Science 12, 3 (2016), 30–43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. [77] Quinlan Casey. 2019. It’s no coincidence the synagogue shooter posted about the ‘red pill movement’. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://thinkprogress.org/no-coincidence-california-synagogue-shooter-john-earnest-posted-about-the-red-pill-movement-aa46b31c01ad/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. [78] Rawls John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. [79] Reddit Help. 2020. Quarantined Subreddits. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043069012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. [80] Ribeiro Manoel Horta, Jhaver Shagun, Zannettou Savvas, Blackburn Jeremy, Cristofaro Emiliano De, Stringhini Gianluca, and West Robert. 2021. Do platform migrations compromise content moderation? evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incels. Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW (Oct. 2021), Article 316, 24 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. [81] Roberts Sarah T.. 2019. Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. [82] Rogers Richard. 2020. Deplatforming: Following extreme internet celebrities to telegram and alternative social media. European Journal of Communication 35, 2 (2020), 0267323120922066.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. [83] santaclaraprinciples.org. 2021. Santa Clara principles on transparency and accountability in content moderation. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://santaclaraprinciples.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. [84] Schmitz Rachel and Kazyak Emily. 2016. Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in men’s rights activist websites. Social Sciences 5, 2 (2016), 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. [85] Seering Joseph, Kraut Robert, and Dabbish Laura. 2017. Shaping pro and anti-social behavior on twitch through moderation and example-setting. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, 111125. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. [86] Seering Joseph, Wang Tony, Yoon Jina, and Kaufman Geoff. 2019. Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms. New Media & Society 21, 2 (2019), 1461444818821316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. [87] Shen Qinlan and Rose Carolyn. 2019. The discourse of online content moderation: Investigating polarized user responses to changes in reddit’s quarantine policy. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Abusive Language Online. 5869.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. [88] Srinivasan Kumar Bhargav, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil Cristian, Lee Lillian, and Tan Chenhao. 2019. Content removal as a moderation strategy: Compliance and other outcomes in the changemyview community. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. [89] Stephen Bijan. 2018. Reddit updates its quarantine policy with an appeals process. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/28/17914240/reddit-update-quarantine-policy-appeals-process.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. [90] Stewart Emily. 2019. Reddit restricts its biggest pro-Trump board over violent threats. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/6/26/18760288/reddit-the-donald-trump-message-board-quarantine-ban.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. [91] Suzor Nicolas, Geelen Tess Van, and West Sarah Myers. 2018. Evaluating the legitimacy of platform governance: A review of research and a shared research agenda. International Communication Gazette 80, 4 (2018), 385400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. [92] Tan Chenhao, Niculae Vlad, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil Cristian, and Lee Lillian. 2016. Winning arguments: Interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good-faith online discussions. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 613624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. [93] Taylor T. L.. 2018. Regulating the networked broadcasting frontier. In Watch me play: Twitch and the Rise of GameLive Streaming. Princeton University Press, Chapter 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. [94] u/landoflobsters. 2018. Revamping the Quarantine Function. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.reddit.com/r/announce-ments/comments/9jf8nh/revamping_the_quarantine_function.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. [95] Ullmann Stefanie and Tomalin Marcus. 2020. Quarantining online hate speech: Technical and ethical perspectives. Ethics and Information Technology 22, 1 (2020), 6980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. [96] Vito Christopher, Admire Amanda, and Hughes Elizabeth. 2018. Masculinity, aggrieved entitlement, and violence: Considering the Isla vista mass shooting. NORMA 13, 2 (2018), 86102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. [97] Warncke-Wang Morten, Ayukaev Vladislav R., Hecht Brent, and Terveen Loren G.. 2015. The success and failure of quality improvement projects in peer production communities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 743756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. [98] Weber Anne. 2009. Manual on Hate Speech. Council Of Europe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. [99] Wilson Mark. 2019. Pinterest is escalating its fight against anti-vaxxers as measles surge in the U.S. Retrieved on 01 March, 2021 from https://www.fastcompany.com/90396075/pinterest-is-escalating-its-fight-against-anti-vaxxers-as-measles-surge-in-the-u-s.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. [100] Wohn Donghee Yvette. 2019. Volunteer moderators in twitch micro communities: How they get involved, the roles they play, and the emotional labor they experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. [101] Zannettou Savvas, Caulfield Tristan, Cristofaro Emiliano De, Kourtelris Nicolas, Leontiadis Ilias, Sirivianos Michael, Stringhini Gianluca, and Blackburn Jeremy. 2017. The web centipede: Understanding how web communities influence each other through the lens of mainstream and alternative news sources. In Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference. 405417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. [102] Zhu Haiyi, Yu Bowen, Halfaker Aaron, and Terveen Loren. 2018. Value-Sensitive algorithm design: Method, case study, and lessons. Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), Article 194, 23 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Quarantined! Examining the Effects of a Community-Wide Moderation Intervention on Reddit

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
      ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 29, Issue 4
      August 2022
      469 pages
      ISSN:1073-0516
      EISSN:1557-7325
      DOI:10.1145/3514186
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 March 2022
      • Revised: 1 October 2021
      • Accepted: 1 October 2021
      • Received: 1 July 2021
      Published in tochi Volume 29, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format