Andrea Bolioli
Rossana Damiano
Antonio Lieto
ABSTRACT
The paper presents a combined approach to knowledge-based emotion attribution and classification of cultural items employed in the H2020 project SPICE. In particular, we show a preliminary experimentation conducted on a selection of items contributed by the GAM Museum in Turin (Galleria di Arte Moderna), pointing out how different language-based approaches to emotion categorization (used in the systems Sophia and DEGARI respectively) can be powerfully combined to cope with both coverage and extended affective attributions. Interestingly, both approaches are based on an ontology of the Plutchik’s theory of emotions.
Supplemental Material
- F. Bertola and V. Patti. 2016. Ontology-based affective models to organize artworks in the social semantic web. Information Processing & Management 52, 1 (2016), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.10.003Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Andrea Bolioli, Federica Salamino, and Veronica Porzionato. 2013. Social Media Monitoring in Real Life with Blogmeter Platform.ESSEM@ AI* IA 1096(2013), 156–163.Google Scholar
- L.E. Bruni, E. Daga, R. Damiano, L. Diaz, T. Kuflik, A. Lieto, A. Gangemi, P. Mulholland, S. Peroni, S. Pescarin, 2020. Towards advanced interfaces for citizen curation. In AVI2CH@ AVI.Google Scholar
- E. Cambria, Y. Li, F.Z. Xing, S. Poria, and K. Kwok. 2020. SenticNet 6: Ensemble application of symbolic and subsymbolic AI for sentiment analysis. In ACM CIKM ’20. ACM, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412003Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eleonora Chiodino, Davide Di Luccio, Antonio Lieto, Alberto Messina, Gian Luca Pozzato, and Davide Rubinetti. 2020. A Knowledge-Based System for the Dynamic Generation and Classification of Novel Contents in Multimedia Broadcasting. In Proceedings of ECAI 2020 - 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 29 August-8 September 2020, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 2020(Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 325). IOS Press, 680–687. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200154Google Scholar
- E. Daga, L. Asprino, R. Damiano, B. Diaz Agudo, A. Gangemi, T. Kuflik, A. Lieto, 2022. Integrating citizen experiences in cultural heritage archives: requirements, state of the art, and challenges. ACM J. on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) (2022).Google Scholar
- P. Ekman and W.V. Friesen. 1971. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion.Journal of personality and social psychology 17, 2(1971), 124.Google Scholar
- Laura Giordano, Valentina Gliozzi, Antonio Lieto, Nicola Olivetti, and Gian Luca Pozzato. 2020. Reasoning about Typicality and Probabilities in Preferential Description Logics. Applications and Practices in Ontology Design, Extraction, and Reasoning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09507(2020).Google Scholar
- L. Giordano, V. Gliozzi, N. Olivetti, and G.L. Pozzato. 2014. Rational Closure in SHIQ. In Informal Proc. of Description Logics, Vienna, Austria, July 17-20, 2014(CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1193). CEUR-WS.org, 543–555. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1193/paper_20.pdfGoogle Scholar
- L. Giordano, V. Gliozzi, N. Olivetti, and G.L. Pozzato. 2015. Semantic characterization of rational closure: From propositional logic to description logics. Artificial Intelligence 226 (2015), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.05.001Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. A. Hampton. 1987. Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Memory & Cognition 15, 1 (1987), 55–71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Leder, G. Gerger, D. Brieber, and N. Schwarz. 2014. What makes an art expert? Emotion and evaluation in art appreciation. Cognition and Emotion 28, 6 (2014), 1137–1147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antonio Lieto. 2021. Cognitive design for artificial minds. Routledge.Google Scholar
- A. Lieto and G.L. Pozzato. 2020. A description logic framework for commonsense conceptual combination integrating typicality, probabilities and cognitive heuristics. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 32, 5(2020), 769–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2019.1672799Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Lieto, G.L. Pozzato, S. Zoia, V. Patti, and R. Damiano. 2021. A commonsense reasoning framework for explanatory emotion attribution, generation and re-classification. Knowledge Based Systems 227 (2021), 107166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107166Google ScholarDigital Library
- Antonio Lieto, Gian Luca Pozzato, Manuel Striani, Stefano Zoia, and Rossana Damiano. 2022. Degari 2.0: A Diversity-Seeking, Knowledge-Based, Explainalable, and Affective Art Recommender for Social Inclusion. Submitted (2022).Google Scholar
- S. Mohammad and S. Kiritchenko. 2018. WikiArt Emotions: An Annotated Dataset of Emotions Evoked by Art. In Proc. of (LREC 2018). Miyazaki, Japan. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/L18-1197Google Scholar
- V. Patti, F. Bertola, and A. Lieto. 2015. Arsemotica for arsmeteo. org: Emotion-driven exploration of online art collections. In Proc. of FLAIRS 2015. AAAI Press, 288–293. http://www.aaai.org/Library/FLAIRS/flairs15contents.phpGoogle Scholar
- R. Plutchik. 1980. A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Theories of emotion. Elsevier, 3–33.Google Scholar
- R. Plutchik. 2001. The nature of emotions. American scientist 89, 4 (2001), 344–350.Google Scholar
- F. Riguzzi, E. Bellodi, E. Lamma, and R. Zese. 2015. Reasoning with Probabilistic Ontologies. In Proc. of IJCAI 2015, Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 25-31, 2015. AAAI Press, 4310–4316. http://ijcai.org/Abstract/15/613Google Scholar
- M. Saif. 2018. Word Affect Intensities. In Proc. of LREC 2018, Miyazaki, Japan, May 7-12, 2018. http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2018/summaries/329.htmlGoogle Scholar
- I. Schindler, G. Hosoya, W. Menninghaus, U. Beermann, V. Wagner, M. Eid, and K.R. Scherer. 2017. Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool. PloS one 12, 6 (2017), e0178899.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Shaver, J. Schwartz, D. Kirson, and C. O’connor. 1987. Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 6(1987), 1061.Google Scholar
- D. Stamkou, E.and Keltner, R. Corona, E. Aksoy, and A.S. Cowen. 2022. Emotional Palette: A Computational Mapping of 25 Emotional Experiences Evoked by Visual Art. (2022).Google Scholar
- Y. Susanto, A.G. Livingstone, B.C. Ng, and E. Cambria. 2020. The hourglass model revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems 35, 5 (2020), 96–102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Noah NN Van Dongen, Jan W Van Strien, and Katinka Dijkstra. 2016. Implicit emotion regulation in the context of viewing artworks: ERP evidence in response to pleasant and unpleasant pictures. Brain and Cognition 107(2016), 48–54.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
DEGARI 2.0: A diversity-seeking, explainable, and affective art recommender for social inclusion
AbstractWe present DEGARI 2.0 (Dynamic Emotion Generator And ReclassIfier): an explainable, affective-based, art recommender relying on the commonsense reasoning framework T CL and exploiting an ontological model formalizing the Plutchik’s ...
Actual Emotion and False Emotion Classification by Physiological Signal
SIP '15: Proceedings of the 2015 8th International Conference on Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition (SIP)The experiment had the purpose of analyzing actual emotions and false expressions through physiological signals. During the test, the subject imagined and expressed positive or negative emotion in accordance with the instructions of the experimenter. ...
Research on Emotion Classification Based on Clustering Algorithm
ICAIIS 2021: 2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Information SystemsEmotion recognition, especially facial expression recognition (FER), has played a vital role in understanding human cognition. The current work focuses on the classification, learning and analysis of the six basic emotions (happy, sadness, fear, disgust,...
Comments