skip to main content
research-article

Stance-level Sarcasm Detection with BERT and Stance-centered Graph Attention Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 May 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Computational Linguistics (CL) associated with the Internet of Multimedia Things (IoMT)-enabled multimedia computing applications brings several research challenges, such as real-time speech understanding, deep fake video detection, emotion recognition, home automation, and so on. Due to the emergence of machine translation, CL solutions have increased tremendously for different natural language processing (NLP) applications. Nowadays, NLP-enabled IoMT is essential for its success. Sarcasm detection, a recently emerging artificial intelligence (AI) and NLP task, aims at discovering sarcastic, ironic, and metaphoric information implied in texts that are generated in the IoMT. It has drawn much attention from the AI and IoMT research community. The advance of sarcasm detection and NLP techniques will provide a cost-effective, intelligent way to work together with machine devices and high-level human-to-device interactions. However, existing sarcasm detection approaches neglect the hidden stance behind texts, thus insufficient to exploit the full potential of the task. Indeed, the stance, i.e., whether the author of a text is in favor of, against, or neutral toward the proposition or target talked in the text, largely determines the text’s actual sarcasm orientation. To fill the gap, in this research, we propose a new task: stance-level sarcasm detection (SLSD), where the goal is to uncover the author’s latent stance and based on it to identify the sarcasm polarity expressed in the text. We then propose an integral framework, which consists of Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and a novel stance-centered graph attention networks (SCGAT). Specifically, BERT is used to capture the sentence representation, and SCGAT is designed to capture the stance information on specific target. Extensive experiments are conducted on a Chinese sarcasm sentiment dataset we created and the SemEval-2018 Task 3 English sarcasm dataset. The experimental results prove the effectiveness of the SCGAT framework over state-of-the-art baselines by a large margin.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Alhamid M. F. et al. 2015. Towards context-sensitive collaborative media recommender system. Multimed. Tools Appl. 74, 24 (2015), 1139911428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Hossain M. S. and Muhammad G.. 2016. Cloud-assisted Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). Enabled framework for health monitoring. Comput. Netw. 101 (2016), 192202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Augenstein Isabelle, Rocktäschel Tim, Vlachos Andreas, and Bontcheva Kalina. 2016. Stance detection with bidirectional conditional encoding. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1606.05464.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Balanke Joseph Herve and Haripriya V.. 2019. Extension of the lexicon algorithm for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC’19). IEEE, 10631068.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Bamman David and Smith Noah A.. 2015. Contextualized sarcasm detection on twitter. In Proceedings of the 9th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Bharti Santosh Kumar, Babu Korra Sathya, and Jena Sanjay Kumar. 2015. Parsing-based sarcasm sentiment recognition in twitter data. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. ACM, 13731380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Cai Yitao, Cai Huiyu, and Wan Xiaojun. 2019. Multi-modal sarcasm detection in twitter with hierarchical fusion model. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 25062515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Chen Danqi and Manning Christopher. 2014. A fast and accurate dependency parser using neural networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’14). 740750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Chia Zheng Lin, Ptaszynski Michal, Masui Fumito, Leliwa Gniewosz, and Wroczynski Michal. 2021. Machine learning and feature engineering-based study into sarcasm and irony classification with application to cyberbullying detection. Info. Process. Manage. 58, 4 (2021), 102600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Davidov Dmitry, Tsur Oren, and Rappoport Ari. 2010. Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in twitter and amazon. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, 107116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] Devlin Jacob, Chang Ming-Wei, Lee Kenton, and Toutanova Kristina N.. 2018. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 41714186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Eke Christopher Ifeanyi, Norman Azah Anir, and Shuib Liyana. 2021. Context-based feature technique for sarcasm identification in benchmark datasets using deep learning and BERT model. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 4850148518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Fang Q. et al. 2016. Folksonomy-based visual ontology construction and its applications. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 18, 4 (2016), 702713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Gaanoun Kamel and Benelallam Imade. 2021. Sarcasm and sentiment detection in arabic language a hybrid approach combining embeddings and rule-based features. In Proceedings of the 6th Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop. 351356.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Godara Jyoti and Aron Rajni. 2021. Support vector machine classifier with principal component analysis and k mean for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS’21), Vol. 1. IEEE, 571576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Goodwin Marjorie H., Cekaite Asta, Goodwin Charles, and Tulbert E.. 2012. Emotion as stance. Emotion in Interaction 16 (2012), 41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Gray Bethany and Biber Douglas. 2012. Current conceptions of stance. In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Springer, 1533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Hernández-Farías Irazú, Benedí José-Miguel, and Rosso Paolo. 2015. Applying basic features from sentiment analysis for automatic irony detection. In Proceedings of the Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. Springer, 337344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Hiremath Basavaraj N. and Patil Malini M.. 2021. Sarcasm detection using cognitive features of visual data by learning model. Expert Syst. Appl. 184 (2021), 115476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Hossain M. S. and Muhammad G.. 2018. Emotion-aware connected healthcare big data towards 5G. IEEE Internet Things J. 5, 4 (2018), 23992406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Hossain M. S. and Muhammad G.. 2019. Emotion recognition using deep-learning approach from audio-visual emotional big data. Info. Fusion 49 (2019), 6978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Hossain M. Shamim, Muhammad Ghulam, and Alamri Atif. 2019. Smart healthcare monitoring: A voice pathology detection paradigm for smart cities. Multimedia Syst. 25, 5 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Huang Binxuan and Carley Kathleen M.. 2019. Syntax-aware aspect level sentiment classification with graph attention networks. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1909.02606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Lin H. et al. 2020. Privacy-enhanced data fusion for COVID-19 applications in intelligent Internet of medical Things. IEEE Internet Things J. 8, 21 (2020), 1568315693.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Jamil Ramish, Ashraf Imran, Rustam Furqan, Saad Eysha, Mehmood Arif, and Choi Gyu Sang. 2021. Detecting sarcasm in multi-domain datasets using convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory network model. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 7 (2021), e645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Joshi Aditya, Tripathi Vaibhav, Patel Kevin, Bhattacharyya Pushpak, and Carman Mark. 2016. Are word embedding-based features useful for sarcasm detection? Retrieved from https://arXiv:1610.00883.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Kamal Ashraf and Abulaish Muhammad. 2021. Cat-bigru: Convolution and attention with bi-directional gated recurrent unit for self-deprecating sarcasm detection. Cogn. Comput. (2021), 119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Khattri Anupam, Joshi Aditya, Bhattacharyya Pushpak, and Carman Mark. 2015. Your sentiment precedes you: Using an author’s historical tweets to predict sarcasm. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis. 2530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Kim Yoon. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1408.5882.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30] Kolchinski Y. Alex and Potts Christopher. 2018. Representing social media users for sarcasm detection. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1808.08470.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [31] Kovaz David, Kreuz Roger J., and Riordan Monica A.. 2013. Distinguishing sarcasm from literal language: Evidence from books and blogging. Disc. Process. 50, 8 (2013), 598615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Kreuz Roger and Caucci Gina. 2007. Lexical influences on the perception of sarcasm. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language. 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. [33] Küçük Dilek and Can Fazli. 2020. Stance detection: A survey. ACM Comput. Surveys 53, 1 (2020), 137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. [34] Liu Y. et al. 2020. Deep anomaly detection for time-series data in industrial IoT: A communication-efficient on-device federated learning approach. IEEE Internet Things J. 8, 8 (2020), 63486358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Kumar Akshi, Sangwan Saurabh Raj, Arora Anshika, Nayyar Anand, Abdel-Basset Mohamed, et al. 2019. Sarcasm detection using soft attention-based bidirectional long short-term memory model with convolution network. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 2331923328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Lai Mirko, Cignarella Alessandra Teresa, Farías Delia Irazú Hernández, Bosco Cristina, Patti Viviana, and Rosso Paolo. 2020. Multilingual stance detection in social media political debates. Comput. Speech Lang. 63 (2020), 101075.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. [37] Levy Roger and Manning Christopher. 2003. Is it harder to parse chinese, or the chinese treebank? In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 439446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. [38] Liang Bin, Lou Chenwei, Li Xiang, Gui Lin, Yang Min, and Xu Ruifeng. 2021. Multi-modal sarcasm detection with interactive in-modal and cross-modal graphs. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 47074715.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. [39] Majumder Navonil, Poria Soujanya, Peng Haiyun, Chhaya Niyati, Cambria Erik, and Gelbukh Alexander. 2019. Sentiment and sarcasm classification with multitask learning. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1901.08014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] Mandal Paul K. and Mahto Rakeshkumar. 2019. Deep CNN-LSTM with word embeddings for news headline sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations (ITNG’19). Springer, 495498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. [41] Masud Mehedi, Gaba Gurjot Singh, Alqahtani Salman, Muhammad Ghulam, Gupta B. B., Kumar Pardeep, and Ghoneim Ahmed. 2021. A lightweight and robust secure key establishment protocol for internet of medical things in COVID-19 patients care. IEEE Internet Things J. 8, 21 (2021), 1569415703. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Masud Mehedi, Gaba Gurjot Singh, Choudhary Karanjeet, Hossain M. Shamim, Alhamid Mohammed F., and Muhammad Ghulam. 2022. Lightweight and anonymity-preserving user authentication scheme for IoT-based healthcare. IEEE Internet Things J. 9, 4 (2022), 26492656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Mohtarami Mitra, Baly Ramy, Glass James, Nakov Preslav, Màrquez Lluís, and Moschitti Alessandro. 2018. Automatic stance detection using end-to-end memory networks. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1804.07581.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] Nayel Hamada, Amer Eslam, Allam Aya, and Abdallah Hanya. 2021. Machine learning-based model for sentiment and sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 6th Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop. 386389.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. [45] Pawar Neha and Bhingarkar Sukhada. 2020. Machine learning based sarcasm detection on twitter data. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES’20). IEEE, 957961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. [46] Pennington Jeffrey, Socher Richard, and Manning Christopher. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’14). 15321543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] Poria Soujanya, Cambria Erik, Hazarika Devamanyu, and Vij Prateek. 2016. A deeper look into sarcastic tweets using deep convolutional neural networks. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1610.08815.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Porwal Saurabh, Ostwal Gaurav, Phadtare Anagha, Pandey Mohini, and Marathe Manisha V.. 2018. Sarcasm detection using recurrent neural network. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS’18). IEEE, 746748.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. [49] Qian Shengsheng et al. 2015. Social event classification via boosted multimodal supervised latent dirichlet allocation. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 11, 2, Article 27 (Jan.2015), 27:1-27:22 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. [50] Rahman Abdur et al. 2021. Adversarial examples-security threats to COVID-19 deep-learning systems in medical IoT devices. IEEE Internet Things J. 8, 12 (2021), 96039610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. [51] Reimers Nils and Gurevych Iryna. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Ren Yafeng, Ji Donghong, and Ren Han. 2018. Context-augmented convolutional neural networks for twitter sarcasm detection. Neurocomputing 308 (2018), 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. [53] Sangaiah Arun Kumar et al. 2019. Enforcing position-based confidentiality with machine learning paradigm through mobile edge computing in real-time industrial informatics. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform. 15, 7 (2019), 41894196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. [54] Schifanella Rossano, de Juan Paloma, Tetreault Joel, and Cao LiangLiang. 2016. Detecting sarcasm in multimodal social platforms. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 11361145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. [55] Shorfuzzaman Mohammad and Hossain M. S.. 2020. MetaCOVID: A siamese neural network framework with contrastive loss for n-shot diagnosis of COVID-19 patients. Pattern Recogn. (2020), 107700107700.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. [56] Sobhani Parinaz, Inkpen Diana, and Zhu Xiaodan. 2017. A dataset for multi-target stance detection. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 551557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. [57] Srivastava Himani, Varshney Vaibhav, Kumari Surabhi, and Srivastava Saurabh. 2020. A novel hierarchical BERT architecture for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Figurative Language Processing. 9397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. [58] Sun Qingying, Wang Zhongqing, Zhu Qiaoming, and Zhou Guodong. 2018. Stance detection with hierarchical attention network. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 23992409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. [59] Sundararajan Karthik and Palanisamy Anandhakumar. 2020. Multi-rule based ensemble feature selection model for sarcasm type detection in twitter. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2020 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. [60] Hossain M. S.. 2015. Cloud-supported cyber.physical localization framework for patients monitoring. IEEE Syst J. 11, 1 (2015), 118127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. [61] Tiwari Prayag, Zhu Hongyin, and Pandey Hari Mohan. 2021. DAPath: Distance-aware knowledge graph reasoning based on deep reinforcement learning. Neural Netw. 135 (2021), 112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Umer Muhammad, Imtiaz Zainab, Ullah Saleem, Mehmood Arif, Choi Gyu Sang, and On Byung-Won. 2020. Fake news stance detection using deep-learning architecture (CNN-LSTM). IEEE Access 8 (2020), 156695156706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. [63] Hee Cynthia Van, Lefever Els, and Hoste Véronique. 2018. Semeval-2018 task 3: Irony detection in english tweets. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 3950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. [64] Veličković Petar, Cucurull Guillem, Casanova Arantxa, Romero Adriana, Lio Pietro, and Bengio Yoshua. 2017. Graph attention networks. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1710.10903.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. [65] Venkatesh B. and Vishwas H. N.. 2021. Real time sarcasm detection on twitter using ensemble methods. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA’21). IEEE, 12921297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. [66] Wang Xinyu, Sun Xiaowen, Yang Tan, and Wang Hongbo. 2020. Building a bridge: A method for image-text sarcasm detection without pretraining on image-text data. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Natural Language Processing Beyond Text. 1929.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. [67] Wang Zelin, Wu Zhijian, Wang Ruimin, and Ren Yafeng. 2015. Twitter sarcasm detection exploiting a context-based model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. Springer, 7791.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. [68] Wu Chuhan, Wu Fangzhao, Wu Sixing, Liu Junxin, Yuan Zhigang, and Huang Yongfeng. 2018. Thu_ngn at semeval-2018 task 3: Tweet irony detection with densely connected lstm and multi-task learning. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 5156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. [69] Wu Yang, Zhao Yanyan, Lu Xin, Qin Bing, Wu Yin, Sheng Jian, and Li Jinlong. 2021. Modeling incongruity between modalities for multimodal sarcasm detection. IEEE MultiMedia 28, 2 (2021), 8695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. [70] Xiong Tao, Zhang Peiran, Zhu Hongbo, and Yang Yihui. 2019. Sarcasm detection with self-matching networks and low-rank bilinear pooling. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 21152124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. [71] Yang X. et al. 2015. Automatic visual concept learning for social event understanding. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 17, 3 (2015), 346358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. [72] Yang X. et al. 2016. Deep relative attributes. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 18, 9 (2016), 18321842.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. [73] Yassine Abdulsalam et al. 2019. IoT big data analytics for smart homes with fog and cloud computing. Future Gen. Comput. Syst. 91 (2019), 563573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. [74] Yin Chunyan, Chen Yongheng, and Zuo Wanli. 2021. Multi-task deep neural networks for joint sarcasm detection and sentiment analysis. Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 31, 1 (2021), 103108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. [75] Zhang Chen, Li Qiuchi, and Song Dawei. 2019. Aspect-based sentiment classification with aspect-specific graph convolutional networks. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1909.03477.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. [76] Zhang Yazhou, Li Qiuchi, Song Dawei, Zhang Peng, and Wang Panpan. 2019. Quantum-inspired interactive networks for conversational sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’19). 54365442. https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/2963533390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. [77] Zhang Yazhou, Liu Yaochen, Li Qiuchi, Tiwari Prayag, Wang Benyou, Li Yuhua, Pandey Hari Mohan, Zhang Peng, and Song Dawei. 2021. CFN: A complex-valued fuzzy network for sarcasm detection in conversations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 29, 12 (2021), 36963710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. [78] Zhang Yazhou, Song Dawei, Li Xiang, Zhang Peng, Wang Panpan, Rong Lu, Yu Guangliang, and Wang Bo. 2020. A quantum-like multimodal network framework for modeling interaction dynamics in multiparty conversational sentiment analysis. Inform. Fusion 62 (2020), 1431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. [79] Zhang Yazhou, Song Dawei, Zhang Peng, Wang Panpan, Li Jingfei, Li Xiang, and Wang Benyou. 2018. A quantum-inspired multimodal sentiment analysis framework. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 752 (2018), 2140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. [80] Zhang Yazhou, Tiwari Prayag, Song Dawei, Mao Xiaoliu, Wang Panpan, Li Xiang, and Pandey Hari Mohan. 2021. Learning interaction dynamics with an interactive LSTM for conversational sentiment analysis. Neural Netw. 133 (2021), 4056.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. [81] Muhammad G. et al. 2020. EEG-based pathology detection for home health monitoring. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 39, 2 (2020), 603610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. [82] Zhu Hongyin, Tiwari Prayag, Ghoneim Ahmed, and Hossain M. Shamim. 2022. A collaborative AI-enabled pretrained language model for AIoT domain question answering. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform. 18, 5 (2022), 33873396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Stance-level Sarcasm Detection with BERT and Stance-centered Graph Attention Networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
          ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  Volume 23, Issue 2
          May 2023
          276 pages
          ISSN:1533-5399
          EISSN:1557-6051
          DOI:10.1145/3597634
          • Editor:
          • Ling Liu
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 May 2023
          • Online AM: 2 May 2022
          • Accepted: 24 April 2022
          • Revised: 28 October 2021
          • Received: 19 November 2020
          Published in toit Volume 23, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        View Full Text