skip to main content
research-article

Federated User Modeling from Hierarchical Information

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 April 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The generation of large amounts of personal data provides data centers with sufficient resources to mine idiosyncrasy from private records. User modeling has long been a fundamental task with the goal of capturing the latent characteristics of users from their behaviors. However, centralized user modeling on collected data has raised concerns about the risk of data misuse and privacy leakage. As a result, federated user modeling has come into favor, since it expects to provide secure multi-client collaboration for user modeling through federated learning. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, existing federated learning methods that ignore the inconsistency among clients cannot be applied directly to practical user modeling scenarios, and moreover, they meet the following critical challenges: 1) Statistical heterogeneity. The distributions of user data in different clients are not always independently identically distributed (IID), which leads to unique clients with needful personalized information; 2) Privacy heterogeneity. User data contains both public and private information, which have different levels of privacy, indicating that we should balance different information shared and protected; 3) Model heterogeneity. The local user models trained with client records are heterogeneous, and thus require a flexible aggregation in the server; 4) Quality heterogeneity. Low-quality information from inconsistent clients poisons the reliability of user models and offsets the benefit from high-quality ones, meaning that we should augment the high-quality information during the process. To address the challenges, in this paper, we first propose a novel client-server architecture framework, namely Hierarchical Personalized Federated Learning (HPFL), with a primary goal of serving federated learning for user modeling in inconsistent clients. More specifically, the client train and deliver the local user model via the hierarchical components containing hierarchical information from privacy heterogeneity to join collaboration in federated learning. Moreover, the client updates the personalized user model with a fine-grained personalized update strategy for statistical heterogeneity. Correspondingly, the server flexibly aggregates hierarchical components from heterogeneous user models in the case of privacy and model heterogeneity with a differentiated component aggregation strategy. In order to augment high-quality information and generate high-quality user models, we expand HPFL to the Augmented-HPFL (AHPFL) framework by incorporating the augmented mechanisms, which filters out low-quality information such as noise, sparse information and redundant information. Specially, we construct two implementations of AHPFL, i.e., AHPFL-SVD and AHPFL-AE, where the augmented mechanisms follow SVD (singular value decomposition) and AE (autoencoder), respectively. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on real-world datasets, which demonstrate the effectiveness of both HPFL and AHPFL frameworks.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Aharon Michal, Elad Michael, and Bruckstein Alfred. 2006. K-SVD: An algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 54, 11 (2006), 43114322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Asi Hilal, Duchi John, and Javidbakht Omid. 2019. Element level differential privacy: The right granularity of privacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04042 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Bhagoji Arjun Nitin, Chakraborty Supriyo, Mittal Prateek, and Calo Seraphin. 2019. Analyzing federated learning through an adversarial lens. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 634643.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Bloice Marcus D, Stocker Christof, and Holzinger Andreas. 2017. Augmentor: An image augmentation library for machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.04680 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Bottou Léon. 2010. Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. In Proceedings of COMPSTAT’2010. Springer, 177186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Brisimi Theodora S, Chen Ruidi, Mela Theofanie, Olshevsky Alex, Paschalidis Ioannis Ch, and Shi Wei. 2018. Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records. International Journal of Medical Informatics 112 (2018), 5967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Carey Peter. 2018. Data Protection: A Practical Guide to UK and EU Law. Oxford University Press, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Chaudhuri Kamalika and Monteleoni Claire. 2009. Privacy-preserving logistic regression. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). 289296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Chen Chong, Zhang Min, Zhang Yongfeng, Liu Yiqun, and Ma Shaoping. 2020. Efficient neural matrix factorization without sampling for recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 38, 2 (2020), 128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Chen Xiaolin, Song Xuemeng, Ren Ruiyang, Zhu Lei, Cheng Zhiyong, and Nie Liqiang. 2020. Fine-grained privacy detection with graph-regularized hierarchical attentive representation learning. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 38, 4 (2020), 126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] Chen Yiqiang, Qin Xin, Wang Jindong, Yu Chaohui, and Gao Wen. 2020. Fedhealth: A federated transfer learning framework for wearable healthcare. IEEE Intelligent Systems 35, 4 (2020), 8393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Chen Yang, Sun Xiaoyan, and Jin Yaochu. 2019. Communication-efficient federated deep learning with layerwise asynchronous model update and temporally weighted aggregation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 31, 10 (2019), 42294238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Cheng Kewei, Fan Tao, Jin Yilun, Liu Yang, Chen Tianjian, and Yang Qiang. 2019. Secureboost: A lossless federated learning framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08755 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Ding Bolin, Kulkarni Janardhan, and Yekhanin Sergey. 2017. Collecting telemetry data privately. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). 35713580.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Dodge Yadolah. 2006. Coefficient of determination. Alphascript Publishing 31, 1 (2006), 6364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Domik Gitta O and Gutkauf Bernd. 1994. User modeling for adaptive visualization systems. In Proceedings Visualization’94. IEEE, 217223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Dzogang Fabon, Lansdall-Welfare Thomas, Sudhahar Saatviga, and Cristianini Nello. 2015. Scalable preference learning from data streams. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). 885890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] Elad Michael and Aharon Michal. 2006. Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Image processing 15, 12 (2006), 37363745.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. [19] Elkahky Ali Mamdouh, Song Yang, and He Xiaodong. 2015. A multi-view deep learning approach for cross domain user modeling in recommendation systems. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). 278288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Erlingsson Úlfar, Pihur Vasyl, and Korolova Aleksandra. 2014. Rappor: Randomized aggregatable privacy-preserving ordinal response. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 10541067.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Flanagan Adrian, Oyomno Were, Grigorievskiy Alexander, Tan Kuan Eeik, Khan Suleiman A, and Ammad-Ud-Din Muhammad. 2020. Federated multi-view matrix factorization for personalized recommendations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04256 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Fogarty James, Baker Ryan S, and Hudson Scott E. 2005. Case studies in the use of ROC curve analysis for sensor-based estimates in human computer interaction. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2005. 129136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Geyer Robin C, Klein Tassilo, and Nabi Moin. 2017. Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07557 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Ghosh Avishek, Chung Jichan, Yin Dong, and Ramchandran Kannan. 2020. An efficient framework for clustered federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04088 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Glorot Xavier and Bengio Yoshua. 2010. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 249256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Guha Neel, Talwalkar Ameet, and Smith Virginia. 2019. One-shot federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.11175 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Hamer Jenny, Mohri Mehryar, and Suresh Ananda Theertha. 2020. Fedboost: A communication-efficient algorithm for federated learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 39733983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Hanzely Filip and Richtárik Peter. 2020. Federated learning of a mixture of global and local models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05516 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] He Xiangnan, Chen Tao, Kan Min-Yen, and Chen Xiao. 2015. Trirank: Review-aware explainable recommendation by modelifng aspects. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 16611670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] He Xiangnan, Liao Lizi, Zhang Hanwang, Nie Liqiang, Hu Xia, and Chua Tat-Seng. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. 173182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Hosseini Hossein, Yun Sungrack, Park Hyunsin, Louizos Christos, Soriaga Joseph, and Welling Max. 2020. Federated learning of user authentication models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.04618 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32] Huang Li, Yin Yifeng, Fu Zeng, Zhang Shifa, Deng Hao, and Liu Dianbo. 2020. LoAdaBoost: Loss-based AdaBoost federated machine learning with reduced computational complexity on IID and non-IID intensive care data. Plos One 15, 4 (2020), e0230706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] Huang Xixi, Ding Ye, Jiang Zoe L, Qi Shuhan, Wang Xuan, and Liao Qing. 2020. DP-FL: A novel differentially private federated learning framework for the unbalanced data. World Wide Web (2020), 117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] Huang Yutao, Chu Lingyang, Zhou Zirui, Wang Lanjun, Liu Jiangchuan, Pei Jian, and Zhang Yong. 2021. Personalized cross-silo federated learning on non-iid data. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 78657873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Huang Zhenya, Liu Qi, Chen Enhong, Zhao Hongke, Gao Mingyong, Wei Si, Su Yu, and Hu Guoping. 2017. Question difficulty prediction for READING problems in standard tests. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Huang Zhenya, Yin Yu, Chen Enhong, Xiong Hui, Su Yu, Hu Guoping, et al. 2019. Ekt: Exercise-aware knowledge tracing for student performance prediction. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Jeong Wonyong, Yoon Jaehong, Yang Eunho, and Hwang Sung Ju. 2020. Federated semi-supervised learning with inter-client consistency. arXiv E-prints (2020), arXiv–2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Ji Shaoxiong, Pan Shirui, Long Guodong, Li Xue, Jiang Jing, and Huang Zi. 2019. Learning private neural language modeling with attentive aggregation. In 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Ji Shaoxiong, Saravirta Teemu, Pan Shirui, Long Guodong, and Walid Anwar. 2021. Emerging trends in federated learning: From model fusion to federated x learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12920 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] Jiang Di, Tong Yongxin, Song Yuanfeng, Wu Xueyang, Zhao Weiwei, Peng Jinhua, Lian Rongzhong, Xu Qian, and Yang Qiang. 2021. Industrial federated topic modeling. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 12, 1 (2021), 122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Jing Qinghe, Wang Weiyan, Zhang Junxue, Tian Han, and Chen Kai. 2019. Quantifying the performance of federated transfer learning. ArXiv abs/1912.12795 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. [42] Johnson Don H. 2006. Signal-to-noise ratio. Scholarpedia 1, 12 (2006), 2088.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Kairouz Peter, McMahan H Brendan, Avent Brendan, Bellet Aurélien, Bennis Mehdi, Bhagoji Arjun Nitin, Bonawitz Keith, Charles Zachary, Cormode Graham, Cummings Rachel, et al. 2019. Advances and open problems in federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04977 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] Ko Tom, Peddinti Vijayaditya, Povey Daniel, and Khudanpur Sanjeev. 2015. Audio augmentation for speech recognition. In Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] Kolen Michael J and Brennan Robert L. 2013. Test Equating: Methods and Practices. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. [46] Li Daliang and Wang Junpu. 2019. Fedmd: Heterogenous federated learning via model distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03581 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Li Tian, Sahu Anit Kumar, Zaheer Manzil, Sanjabi Maziar, Talwalkar Ameet, and Smith Virginia. 2018. Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.06127 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Li Xiang, Huang Kaixuan, Yang Wenhao, Wang Shusen, and Zhang Zhihua. 2019. On the convergence of fedavg on non-iid data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02189 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. [49] Liu Boyi, Wang Lujia, and Liu Ming. 2019. Lifelong federated reinforcement learning: A learning architecture for navigation in cloud robotic systems. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 4, 4 (2019), 45554562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. [50] Liu Qi, Ge Yong, Li Zhongmou, Chen Enhong, and Xiong Hui. 2011. Personalized travel package recommendation. In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 407416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. [51] Liu Qi, Wu Runze, Chen Enhong, Xu Guandong, Su Yu, Chen Zhigang, and Hu Guoping. 2018. Fuzzy cognitive diagnosis for modelling examinee performance. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 9, 4 (2018), 126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. [52] Liu Shuchang, Xu Shuyuan, Yu Wenhui, Fu Zuohui, Zhang Yongfeng, and Marian Amelie. 2021. FedCT: Federated collaborative transfer for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 716725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. [53] Liu Yang, Kang Yan, Xing Chaoping, Chen Tianjian, and Yang Qiang. 2020. A secure federated transfer learning framework. IEEE Intelligent Systems 35, 4 (2020), 7082.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. [54] Liu Yang, Liu Yingting, Liu Zhijie, Liang Yuxuan, Meng Chuishi, Zhang Junbo, and Zheng Yu. 2020. Federated forest. IEEE Transactions on Big Data (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. [55] Lu Hongyu, Zhang Min, Ma Weizhi, Shao Yunqiu, Liu Yiqun, and Ma Shaoping. 2019. Quality effects on user preferences and behaviorsin mobile news streaming. In The World Wide Web Conference. 11871197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. [56] Maaten Laurens van der and Hinton Geoffrey. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, Nov (2008), 25792605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. [57] MacQueen James et al. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1. Oakland, CA, USA, 281297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. [58] Mansour Yishay, Mohri Mehryar, Ro Jae, and Suresh Ananda Theertha. 2020. Three approaches for personalization with applications to federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.10619 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. [59] Mao Jiaxin, Liu Yiqun, Kando Noriko, Zhang Min, and Ma Shaoping. 2018. How does domain expertise affect Users’ search interaction and outcome in exploratory search? ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 36, 4 (2018), 130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. [60] McMahan Brendan, Moore Eider, Ramage Daniel, Hampson Seth, and Arcas Blaise Aguera y. 2017. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 12731282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. [61] McMahan H Brendan, Ramage Daniel, Talwar Kunal, and Zhang Li. 2017. Learning differentially private recurrent language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.06963 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. [62] Meng Chuizheng, Rambhatla Sirisha, and Liu Yan. 2021. Cross-node federated graph neural network for spatio-temporal data modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05223 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. [63] Mohri Mehryar, Sivek Gary, and Suresh Ananda Theertha. 2019. Agnostic federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00146 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. [64] Mostafa Hesham. 2019. Robust federated learning through representation matching and adaptive hyper-parameters. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.13075 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. [65] Muhammad Khalil, Wang Qinqin, O’Reilly-Morgan Diarmuid, Tragos Elias, Smyth Barry, Hurley Neil, Geraci James, and Lawlor Aonghus. 2020. FedFast: Going beyond average for faster training of federated recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 12341242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. [66] Najafabadi Maryam M, Villanustre Flavio, Khoshgoftaar Taghi M, Seliya Naeem, Wald Randall, and Muharemagic Edin. 2015. Deep learning applications and challenges in big data analytics. Journal of Big Data 2, 1 (2015), 121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. [67] Peterson Daniel, Kanani Pallika, and Marathe Virendra J. 2019. Private federated learning with domain adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06733 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. [68] Poushter Jacob et al. 2016. Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Pew Research Center 22, 1 (2016), 144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. [69] Qi Tao, Wu Fangzhao, Wu Chuhan, Huang Yongfeng, and Xie Xing. 2020. Privacy-preserving news recommendation model training via federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.09592 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. [70] Ren Hanchi, Deng Jingjing, and Xie Xianghua. 2020. Privacy preserving text recognition with gradient-boosting for federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.07296 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. [71] Ribeiro Leonardo Filipe Rodrigues and Figueiredo Daniel Ratton. 2017. Ranking lawyers using a social network induced by legal cases. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 23, 1 (2017), 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. [72] Rothchild Daniel, Panda Ashwinee, Ullah Enayat, Ivkin Nikita, Stoica Ion, Braverman Vladimir, Gonzalez Joseph, and Arora Raman. 2020. Fetchsgd: Communication-efficient federated learning with sketching. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 82538265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. [73] Sattler Felix, Wiedemann Simon, Müller Klaus-Robert, and Samek Wojciech. 2019. Robust and communication-efficient federated learning from non-iid data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. [74] Shen Xuehua, Tan Bin, and Zhai ChengXiang. 2005. Implicit user modeling for personalized search. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 824831.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. [75] Shi Chuan, Han Xiaotian, Song Li, Wang Xiao, Wang Senzhang, Du Junping, and Philip S Yu. 2019. Deep collaborative filtering with multi-aspect information in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 33, 4 (2019), 14131425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. [76] Shi Shaoyun, Ma Weizhi, Zhang Min, Zhang Yongfeng, Yu Xinxing, Shan Houzhi, Liu Yiqun, and Ma Shaoping. 2020. Beyond user embedding matrix: Learning to hash for modeling large-scale users in recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 319328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. [77] Shorten Connor and Khoshgoftaar Taghi M. 2019. A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. Journal of Big Data 6, 1 (2019), 148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. [78] Smith Virginia, Chiang Chao-Kai, Sanjabi Maziar, and Talwalkar Ameet. 2017. Federated multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.10467 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. [79] Sun Lichao, Qian Jianwei, Chen Xun, and Yu Philip S. 2020. Ldp-fl: Practical private aggregation in federated learning with local differential privacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.15789 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. [80] Sun Peijie, Wu Le, Zhang Kun, Fu Yanjie, Hong Richang, and Wang Meng. 2020. Dual learning for explainable recommendation: Towards unifying user preference prediction and review generation. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 837847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. [81] Suzumura Toyotaro, Zhou Yi, Baracaldo Natahalie, Ye Guangnan, Houck Keith, Kawahara Ryo, Anwar Ali, Stavarache Lucia Larise, Watanabe Yuji, Loyola Pablo, et al. 2019. Towards federated graph learning for collaborative financial crimes detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12946 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. [82] Triastcyn Aleksei and Faltings Boi. 2019. Federated learning with bayesian differential privacy. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 25872596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. [83] Truex Stacey, Baracaldo Nathalie, Anwar Ali, Steinke Thomas, Ludwig Heiko, Zhang Rui, and Zhou Yi. 2019. A hybrid approach to privacy-preserving federated learning. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security. 111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. [84] Victor Jacob M. 2013. The EU general data protection regulation: Toward a property regime for protecting data privacy. Yale LJ 123 (2013), 513.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. [85] Vincent Pascal, Larochelle Hugo, Bengio Yoshua, and Manzagol Pierre-Antoine. 2008. Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning. 10961103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. [86] Vincent Pascal, Larochelle Hugo, Lajoie Isabelle, Bengio Yoshua, Manzagol Pierre-Antoine, and Bottou Léon. 2010. Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. Journal of Machine Learning Research 11, 12 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. [87] Voss W Gregory. 2016. European union data privacy law reform: General data protection regulation, privacy shield, and the right to delisting. The Business Lawyer 72, 1 (2016), 221234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. [88] Wang Fei, Liu Qi, Chen Enhong, Huang Zhenya, Chen Yuying, Yin Yu, Huang Zai, and Wang Shijin. 2020. Neural cognitive diagnosis for intelligent education systems. In 34nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020. 61536161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. [89] Wang Hao, Kaplan Zakhary, Niu Di, and Li Baochun. 2020. Optimizing federated learning on non-iid data with reinforcement learning. In IEEE INFOCOM 2020-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 16981707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. [90] Wang Haoyu, Li Yuanchun, Guo Yao, Agarwal Yuvraj, and Hong Jason I. 2017. Understanding the purpose of permission use in mobile apps. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 35, 4 (2017), 140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. [91] Wang Hao, Xu Tong, Liu Qi, Lian Defu, Chen Enhong, Du Dongfang, Wu Han, and Su Wen. 2019. MCNE: An end-to-end framework for learning multiple conditional network representations of social network. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 10641072.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. [92] Wang Yansheng, Tong Yongxin, and Shi Dingyuan. 2020. Federated latent dirichlet allocation: A local differential privacy based framework. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 62836290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. [93] Wei Kang, Li Jun, Ding Ming, Ma Chuan, Yang Howard H, Farokhi Farhad, Jin Shi, Quek Tony QS, and Poor H Vincent. 2020. Federated learning with differential privacy: Algorithms and performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 15 (2020), 34543469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. [94] Wei Xiguang, Li Quan, Liu Yang, Yu Han, Chen Tianjian, and Yang Qiang. 2019. Multi-agent visualization for explaining federated learning.. In IJCAI. 65726574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. [95] Wu Chuhan, Wu Fangzhao, Cao Yang, Huang Yongfeng, and Xie Xing. 2021. Fedgnn: Federated graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04925 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. [96] Wu Jinze, Huang Zhenya, Liu Qi, Lian Defu, Wang Hao, Chen Enhong, Ma Haiping, and Wang Shijin. 2021. Federated deep knowledge tracing. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. [97] Wu Jinze, Liu Qi, Huang Zhenya, Ning Yuting, Wang Hao, Chen Enhong, Yi Jinfeng, and Zhou Bowen. 2021. Hierarchical personalized federated learning for user modeling. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 957968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. [98] Wu Peizhi, Tu Yi, Yang Zhenglu, Jatowt Adam, and Odagaki Masato. 2018. Deep modeling of the evolution of user preferences and item attributes in dynamic social networks. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018. 115116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. [99] Xie Han, Ma Jing, Xiong Li, and Yang Carl. 2021. Federated graph classification over non-iid graphs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. [100] Xue Gui-Rong, Han Jie, Yu Yong, and Yang Qiang. 2009. User language model for collaborative personalized search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 27, 2 (2009), 128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. [101] Yang Liu, Tan Ben, Zheng Vincent W, Chen Kai, and Yang Qiang. 2020. Federated recommendation systems. In Federated Learning. Springer, 225239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. [102] Yang Qiang, Liu Yang, Chen Tianjian, and Tong Yongxin. 2019. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10, 2 (2019), 119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. [103] Yang Qiang, Liu Yang, Cheng Yong, Kang Yan, Chen Tianjian, and Yu Han. 2019. Federated learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 13, 3 (2019), 1207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. [104] Yannakakis Georgios N and Togelius Julian. 2018. Artificial Intelligence and Games. Vol. 2. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. [105] Yin Hongzhi, Cui Bin, Chen Ling, Hu Zhiting, and Zhou Xiaofang. 2015. Dynamic user modeling in social media systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 33, 3 (2015), 144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. [106] Zhang Fengda, Kuang Kun, You Zhaoyang, Shen Tao, Xiao Jun, Zhang Yin, Wu Chao, Zhuang Yueting, and Li Xiaolin. 2020. Federated unsupervised representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08982 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. [107] Zhang Fuzheng, Yuan Nicholas Jing, Zheng Kai, Lian Defu, Xie Xing, and Rui Yong. 2016. Exploiting dining preference for restaurant recommendation. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 725735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. [108] Zhao Hongke, Liu Qi, Zhu Hengshu, Ge Yong, Chen Enhong, Zhu Yan, and Du Junping. 2017. A sequential approach to market state modeling and analysis in online p2p lending. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 48, 1 (2017), 2133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. [109] Zheng Longfei, Zhou Jun, Chen Chaochao, Wu Bingzhe, Wang Li, and Zhang Benyu. 2021. ASFGNN: Automated separated-federated graph neural network. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 14, 3 (2021), 16921704.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  110. [110] Zukerman Ingrid and Albrecht David W. 2001. Predictive statistical models for user modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 1-2 (2001), 518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Federated User Modeling from Hierarchical Information

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
        ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 41, Issue 2
        April 2023
        770 pages
        ISSN:1046-8188
        EISSN:1558-2868
        DOI:10.1145/3568971
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 April 2023
        • Online AM: 9 February 2023
        • Accepted: 2 August 2022
        • Revised: 11 June 2022
        • Received: 3 June 2021
        Published in tois Volume 41, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format