skip to main content
10.1145/3561212.3561228acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesamConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Both Rudimentary Visualization and Prototypical Sonification can Serve as a Benchmark to Evaluate New Sonification Designs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Comparing sonification with visualization is like comparing apples and oranges. While visualizations are ubiquitous to the public and have established names, principles, application areas, and sophisticated designs, sonifications tend to be unique, self-made and completely new to users. In this study we developed a rudimentary visualization that is related closely to the principle of the sonification designs that we want to evaluate. In addition, we implemented a prototypical sonification that uses the most common mapping principles. Experiment results show that participants perform similarly well using the rudimentary visualization and the prototypical sonification, which is much better than chance but significantly worse than using our new sonification design. We therefore argue that both rudimentary visualization and prototypical sonifications can serve as a suitable benchmark to evaluate new sonifications designs against.

References

  1. Maxime Aubert, Rustan Lebe, Adhi Agus Oktaviana, Muhammad Tang, Basran Burhan, Hamrullah, Andi Jusdi, Abdullah, Budianto Hakim, Jian xin Zhao, I. Made Geria, Priyatno Hadi Sulistyarto, Ratno Sardi, and Adam Brumm. 2019. Earliest hunting scene in prehistoric art. Nature 576, 7787 (Dec. 2019), 442–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1806-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. David Black, Julian Hettig, Maria Luz, Christian Hansen, Ron Kikinis, and Horst Hahn. 2017. Auditory feedback to support image-guided medical needle placement. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 12, 9(2017), 1655–1663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1537-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Terri L. Bonebright and John H. Flowers. 2011. Evaluation of Auditory Display. In The Sonification Handbook, Thomas Hermann, Andy Hunt, and John G. Neuhoff (Eds.). COST and Logos, Berlin, 111–144. http://sonification.de/handbookGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tifanie Bouchara, Brian F. G. Katz, Christian Jacquemin, and Catherine Guastavino. 2010. Audio-Visual Renderings for Multimedia Navigation. In 16th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2010), Eoin Brazil (Ed.). Washington, DC, USA, 245–252. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/58425Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nicholas J. Conrad, Maria Malina, and Susanne C. Münzel. 2009. New flutes document the earliest musical tradition in southwestern Germany. Nature 460, 7256 (Aug. 2009), 737–740. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08169Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaël Dubus and Roberto Bresin. 2013. A Systematic Review of Mapping Strategies for the Sonification of Physical Quantities. PLOS ONE 9, 4 (12 2013), e96018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082491Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaël Dubus and Roberto Bresin. 2015. Exploration and evaluation of a system for interactive sonification of elite rowing. Sports Eng 18(2015), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-011-0085-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gustav Theodor Fechner. 1860. Elemente der Psychophysik. Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Thomas Hermann. 2002. Sonification for Exploratory Data Analysis. Ph. D. Dissertation. Bielefeld University, Bielefeld. http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/ags/ami/publications/media/Hermann2002-SFE.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Takanori Komatsu and Seiji Yamada. 2016. Can Monaural Auditory Displays Convey Directional Information to Users?. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, and J. C. Trueswell (Eds.). Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, 930–935. https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2016/papers/0170/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tapio Lokki and Matti Gröhn. 2005. Navigation with auditory cues in a virtual environment. IEEE MultiMedia 12, 2 (April 2005), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2005.33Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Frederik Nagel, Fabian-Robert Stöter, Noberto Degara, Stefan Balke, and David Worrall. 2014. Fast and Accurate Guidance – Response Times to Navigational Sounds. In ICAD. New York, NY, 5 pages. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/52058Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaëtan Parseihian, Charles Gondre, Mitsuko Aramaki, Sølvi Ystad, and Richard Kronland-Martinet. 2016. Comparison and Evaluation of Sonification Strategies for Guidance Tasks. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 18, 4 (April 2016), 674–686. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2016.2531978Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Albrecht Schneider. 2018. Fundamentals. In Springer Handbook of Systematic Musicology, Rolf Bader (Ed.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 559–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55004-5_30Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sebastian Schwarz and Tim Ziemer. 2019. A psychoacoustic sound design for pulse oximetry. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Newcastle. https://doi.org/10.21785/icad2019.024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mariana Seiça, Licínio Roque, Pedro Martins, and F. Amílcar Cardoso. 2020. Contrasts and similarities between two audio research communities in evaluating auditory artefacts. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Audio Mostly. New York, NY, USA, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411109.3411146Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Roger N. Shepard. 1964. Circularity in Judgments of Relative Pitch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 36, 12 (1964), 2346–2353. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1919362Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Katharina Vogt. 2011. A Quantitative Evaluation Approach to Sonifications. In Pro. 17th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2011). Budapest, Hungary, 7 pages. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/51571Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Bruce N. Walker and Jeff Lindsay. 2003. Effect of Beacon Sounds on Navigation Performance in a Virtual Reality Environment. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2003). Boston, MA, 204–207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. David Worrall. 2019. Sonification Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01497-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tim Ziemer. 2020. Psychoacoustic Music Sound Field Synthesis. Current Research in Systematic Musicology, Vol. 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23033-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tim Ziemer. 2022. Visualization vs. Sonification to Level a Table. In Proceedings of ISon 2022, 7th Interactive Sonification Workshop. Delmenhorst, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tim Ziemer, David Black, and Holger Schultheis. 2017. Psychoacoustic sonification design for navigation in surgical interventions. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000557Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tim Ziemer, Nuttawut Nuchprayoon, and Holger Schultheis. 2020. Psychoacoustic Sonification as User Interface for Human-Machine Interaction. International Journal of Informatics Society 11, 3 (2020), 3–16. http://www.infsoc.org/journal/vol11/11-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tim Ziemer and Holger Schultheis. 2018. A Psychoacoustic Auditory Display for Navigation. In 24th International Conference on Auditory Displays (ICAD2018). Houghton, MI, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.21785/icad2018.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Tim Ziemer and Holger Schultheis. 2019. Psychoacoustic auditory display for navigation: an auditory assistance system for spatial orientation tasks. J Multimodal User Interfaces 13 (2019), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-018-0282-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Tim Ziemer and Holger Schultheis. 2019. Psychoacoustical Signal Processing for Three-Dimensional Sonification. In 25th International Conference on Auditory Displays (ICAD2019). Newcastle, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.21785/icad2019.018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tim Ziemer and Holger Schultheis. 2021. The CURAT Sonification Game: Gamification for Remote Sonification Evaluation. In 26th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2021). Virtual conference, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.21785/icad2021.026Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tim Ziemer, Holger Schultheis, David Black, and Ron Kikinis. 2018. Psychoacoustical Interactive Sonification for Short Range Navigation. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 104, 6 (2018), 1075–1093. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.919273Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Both Rudimentary Visualization and Prototypical Sonification can Serve as a Benchmark to Evaluate New Sonification Designs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AM '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference
      September 2022
      245 pages
      ISBN:9781450397018
      DOI:10.1145/3561212

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate177of275submissions,64%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format