skip to main content
research-article

A Computational Geometry-based Approach for Planar k-Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks

Published:03 February 2023Publication History
Skip Editorial Notes Section

Editorial Notes

The authors have requested minor, non-substantive changes to the VoR and, in accordance with ACM policies, a Corrected Version of Record was published on October 06, 2023. For reference purposes, the VoR may still be accessed via the Supplemental Material section on this citation page.

Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The problem of coverage is one of the most crucial issues among the problems in the lifecycle of the development of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). It is still open and stirs as much concern in the research community in this area. The problem of k-coverage in WSNs is even more challenging. In this article, we investigate the k-coverage problem in planar (or two-dimensional) WSNs, where each point in a field of interest (FoI) is covered by at least k sensors simultaneously, where k ≥ 1. Our contribution is four-fold: First, we determine the optimal planar convex tile that maximizes the usage of the sensors’ sensing range. Then, we propose a few sensor placement strategies based on the degree of coverage k using a hexagonal tiling-based approach. In addition, we compute the sensor density (i.e., number of sensors per unit area) for each of the above sensor placement strategies. Second, we propose a generalized one using irregular hexagons, which are denoted by IRH(r/n), where r stands for the radius of the sensors’ sensing range and n ≥ 2 is a natural number. Also, we derive the corresponding sensor density. Moreover, we prove that IRH(r/n) are capable of tiling the Euclidean plane using a mathematical induction proof. Third, we compute the relationship between the sensing range r of the sensors and their communication range R for the above sensor placement strategies. Fourth, we corroborate our analysis with simulation results.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

REFERENCES

  1. Abo-Zahhad Mohammed, Sabor Nabil, Sasaki Shigenobu, and Ahmed Sabah M.. 2016. A centralized immune-Voronoi deployment algorithm for coverage maximization and energy conservation in mobile wireless sensor networks. Information Fusion 30, July 2016 (2016), 36--51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1566253515001037.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Abrams Zoe, Goel Ashish, and Plotkin Serge. 2004. Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 424432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ammari Habib M.. 2019. Achieving sensing k-coverage using hexagonal tiling: Are we done yet? In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Smart Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ammari Habib M.. 2014. Investigating the energy sink-hole problem in connected k-covered wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers 63, 11 (2014), 27292742.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ammari Habib M. and Das Sajal K.. 2012. Centralized and clustered k-coverage protocols for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers 61, 1 (2012), 118133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bai Xiaole, Kumar Santosh, Xuan Dong, Yun Ziqiu, and Lai Ten H.. 2006. Deploying wireless sensors to achieve both coverage and connectivity. In Proceedings of 7th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, 131142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Thi Thanh Binh Huynh, Thi Hanh Nguyen, Van Quan La, Duc Nghia Nguyen, and Dey Nilanjan. 2020. Metaheuristics for maximization of obstacles constrained area coverage in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Applied Soft Computing 86, January 2020 (2020), 105939. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568494619307203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollobás Bela. 2006. The Art of Mathematics: Coffee Time in Memphis. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Boukerche Azzedine and Sun Peng. 2018. Connectivity and coverage based protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 80, November 2018 (2018), 54--69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1570870518304360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bulusu Nirupama, Heidemann John, and Estrin Deborah. 2000. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 7, 5 (2000), 2834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Capanna Alessandra and Lorenzi Marcella G.. 2013. RaM - Recycle and Mathematics: The art of tiling for eco-design. In Proceedings of the Bridges 2013: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture. Enschede, the Netherlands, 629634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakraborty Suparna, Goyal N. K., Mahapatra S., and Soh Sieteng. 2020. A Monte-Carlo Markov chain approach for coverage-area reliability of mobile wireless sensor networks with multistate nodes. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 193, January 2020 (2020), 106662. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832019300353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chen Da-Ren, Chen Lin-Chih, Chen Mu-Yen, and Hsu Ming-Yang. 2019. A coverage-aware and energy-efficient protocol for the distributed wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications 137, March 2019 (2019), 15--31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366418303682.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chenait Manel, Zebbane Bahia, Benzaid Chafika, and Badache Nadjib. 2017. Energy-efficient coverage protocol based on stable and predictive scheduling in wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks 127, November 2017 (2017), 1--12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128617302967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Chesnokov Nicole. 2018. The Art Gallery Problem: An Overview and Extension to Chromatic Coloring and Mobile Guards. Technical Report. https://math.mit.edu/∼apost/courses/18.204_2018/Nicole_Chesnokov_paper.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chin Wei-Pang and Ntafos Simeon. 1988. Optimum watchman routes. Information Processing Letters 28, 1 (1988), 3944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Deng Xianjun, Jiang Yalan, Yang Laurence T., Lin Man, Yi Lingzhi, and Wang Minghua. 2019. Data fusion based coverage optimization in heterogeneous sensor networks: A survey. Information Fusion 52, December 2019 (2019), 90--105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1566253518306535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Elfes Alberto. 1989. Using occupancy grids for mobile robot perception and navigation. IEEE Computer 22, 6 (1989), 4657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Elhoseny Mohamed, Tharwat Alaa, Yuan Xiaohui, and Ella Hassanien Aboul. 2018. Optimizing K-coverage of mobile WSNs. Expert Systems with Applications 92, February 2018 (2018), 142--153. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417417306115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Etancelin Jean-Matthieu, Fabbri André, Guinand Frédéric, and Rosalie Martin. 2019. DACYCLEM: A decentralized algorithm for maximizing coverage and lifetime in a mobile wireless sensor network. Ad Hoc Networks 87, May 2019 (2019), 174--187. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870518309430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Fang Wei, Song Xinhong, Wu Xiaojun, Sun Jun, and Hu Mengqi. 2018. Novel efficient deployment schemes for sensor coverage in mobile wireless sensor networks. Information Fusion 41, May 2018 (2018), 25--36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1566253516302548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Gardner Martin. 1988. Tilings with convex polygons. In Proceedings of the Time Travel and Other Mathematical Bewilderments. New York: W. H. Freeman, 162176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorain Barun, Sarathi Mandal Partha. 2017. Solving energy issues for sweep coverage in wireless sensor networks. Discrete Applied Mathematics 228, September 2017 (2017), 130--139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166218X16304346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Grunbaum Branko and Shephard G. C.. 1980. Tilings with congruent tiles. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 3, 3 (1980), 951973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kumar Gupta Suneet, Kuila Pratyay, and Jana Prasanta K.. 2016. Genetic algorithm approach for k-coverage and m-connected node placement in target based wireless sensor networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering 56, November 2016 (2016), 544--556. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045790615003651.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Gupta Himanshu, Zhou Zongheng, Das Samir, and Gu Quinyi. 2006. Connected sensor cover: Self-organization of sensor networks for efficient query execution. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 14, 1 (2006), 5567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hanh Nguyen Thi, Binh Huynh Thi Thanh, Hoai Nguyen Xuan, and Palaniswami Marimuthu Swami. 2019. An efficient genetic algorithm for maximizing area coverage in wireless sensor networks. Information Sciences 488, July 2019 (2019), 5875. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025519301823?via%3Dihub.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Heinzelman Wendi, Chandrakasan A., and Balakrishnan H.. 2002. An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 1, 4 (2002), 660670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hilbert David. 1901--1902. Mathematische problem. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 8, July 1902 (1901--1902), 437--479. https://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1902-08-10/S0002-9904-1902-00923-3/S0002-9904-1902-00923-3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Hoffmann Frank. 1990. On the rectilinear art gallery problem. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming. Springer, Berlin, 717728.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Hong Yi, Luo Chuanwen, Li Deying, Chen Zhibo, Wang Xiyun, Li Xiao. 2022. Energy efficiency optimization for multiple chargers in wireless rechargeable sensor networks. Elsevier Theoretical Computer Science 922, June 2022 (2022), 193--205. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304397522002468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Huang Chi-Fu and Tseng Yu-Chee. 2005. The coverage problem in a wireless sensor network. Springer Mobile Networks and Applications 10, 4 (2005), 519528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Huang Chi-Fu, Tseng Yu-Chee, and Wu Hsiao-Lu. 2007. Distributed protocols for ensuring both coverage and connectivity of a wireless sensor network. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 3, 1 (2007). DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Kabakulak Banu. 2019. Sensor and sink placement, scheduling and routing algorithms for connected coverage of wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 86, April 2019 (2019), 83--102. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870518308199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kershner Richard B.. 1968. On paving the plane. The American Mathematical Monthly 75, 8 (1968), 839844.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Kershner Richard B.. 1939. The number of circles covering a set. American Journal of Mathematics 1, 3 (1939), 665671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Khanjary Mohammad, Sabaei Masoud, and Meybodi Mohammad Reza. 2015. Critical density for coverage and connectivity in two-dimensional fixed-orientation directional sensor networks using continuum percolation. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 57, November 2015 (2015), 169--181. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084804515001964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kumar Santosh, Lai Ten H., and Balogh Jozsef. 2004. On k-coverage in a mostly sleeping sensor network. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM New York, 144158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kuo Chia-Hsu, Chen Tzung-Shi, and Syu Siou-Ci. 2017. Adaptive trap coverage in mobile sensor networks. Procedia Computer Science 110 (2017), 102109. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050917313054.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Lee Chunseok, Shin Donghoon, Bae Sang Won, and Choi Sunghee. 2013. Best and worst-case coverage problems for arbitrary paths in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 11, 6 (2013), 16991714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Li Qiangyi and Liu Ningzhong. 2019. Monitoring area coverage optimization algorithm based on nodes perceptual mathematical model in wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications (In press, Journal pre-proof Available online), (December 2019). 155, April 2020 (2020), 227--234. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366419315117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Li Feng, Luo Jun, Xin Shiqing, and He Ying. 2016. Autonomous deployment of wireless sensor networks for optimal coverage with directional sensing model. Computer Networks 108, October 2016 (2016), 120--132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128616302493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Li Xiang-Yang, Wan Peng-Jun, and Frieder Ophir. 2003. Coverage in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers 52, 6 (2003), 753763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Liu Chong, Wu Kui, Xiao Yang, and Sun Bo. 2006. Random coverage with guaranteed connectivity: Joint scheduling for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 17, 6 (2006), 562575.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Liu Song, Zhang Runlan, Shi Yongheng. 2020. Design of coverage algorithm for mobile sensor networks based on virtual molecular force. Computer Communications 150, January 2020 (2020), 269--277. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366419311879.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Luo Chuanwen, Hong Yi, Li Deying, Wang Yongcai, Chen Wenping, and Hu Qian. 2020. Maximizing network lifetime using coverage sets scheduling in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 98, March 2020 (2020). 102037. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870519304512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Bin Malek Sakib Md., Sadik Md. Muntakim, and Rahman Ashikur. 2016. On balanced k-coverage in visual sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 72, September 2016 (2016), 72--86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084804516301400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Megerian Seapahn, Koushanfar Farinaz, Potkonjak Miodrag, and Srivastava Mani. 2005. Worst and best-case coverage in sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 4, 1 (2005), 8492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Megerian Seapahn, Koushanfar Farinaz, Potkonjak Miodrag, and Srivastava Mani. 2001. Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 13801387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Milnor John W.. 1976. Hilbert's problem 18. In Proceedings of the Symposia of Pure Mathematics, 28, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Mohamed Shaimaa M., Hamza Haitham S., and Aly Saroit Iman. 2017. Coverage in mobile wireless sensor networks (M-WSN): A survey. Computer Communications 110, September 2017 (2017), 133--150. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366417307235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. More Avinash and Raisinghani Vijay. 2017. A node failure and battery-aware coverage protocol for wireless sensor networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering 64, November 2017 (2017), 200219. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045790616311570.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Movassagh Mahdi and Aghdasi Hadi S.. 2017. Game theory based node scheduling as a distributed solution for coverage control in wireless sensor networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 65, October 2017 (2017), 137146. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0952197617301689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Le Nguyen Phi, Thi Hanh Nguyen, Tien Khuong Nguyen, Thi Thanh Binh Huynh, and Ji Yusheng. 2019. Node placement for connected target coverage in wireless sensor networks with dynamic sinks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 59, October 2019 (2019), 101070. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1574119219301415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Pach Janos and Sharir Micha. 2008. Combinatorial Geometry and Its Algorithmic Applications, Chapter 8. American Mathematical Society.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Reinhardt Karl. 1918. Uber die Zerlegung der Ebene in Polygone. Dissertation der Naturwiss. Fakultat. Universitat Frankfurt/Main, Borna.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Roselin J., Latha P., and Benitta S.. 2017. Maximizing the wireless sensor networks lifetime through energy efficient connected coverage. Ad Hoc Networks 62, July 2017 (2017), 1--10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870517300689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Shakkottai Sanjay, Srikant Rayadurgam, and Shroff Ness. 2005. Unreliable sensor grids: Coverage, connectivity and diameter. Ad Hoc Networks 3, 6 (2005), 702716.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Sharmin Selina, Narin Nur Fernaz, Razzaque Md. Abdur, Rahman Md. Mustafizur, and Rahman Sk. Md. Mizanur. 2017. α-Overlapping area coverage for clustered directional sensor networks. Computer Communications 1091, September 2017 (2017), 89103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366417306072.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Song and Yuan Fan Cheng. 2018. Coverage control for mobile sensor networks with limited communication ranges on a circle. Automatica 92, June 2018 (2018), 155161. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005109818301018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Sun Geng, Liu Yanheng, Li Han, Wang Aimin, Liang Shuang, and Zhang Ying. 2018. A novel connectivity and coverage algorithm based on shortest path for wireless sensor networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering 71, October 2018 (2018), 1025--1039. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045790617312983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Fejes Toth Laszlo. 1964. Regular Figures. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang You-Chiun and Tseng Yu-Chee. 2008. Distributed deployment schemes for mobile wireless sensor networks to ensure multi-level coverage. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 19, 9 (2008), 12801294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Vatankhah Ayda and Babaie Shahram. 2018. An optimized Bidding-based coverage improvement algorithm for hybrid wireless sensor networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering 65, January 2018 (2018), 1--17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045790617322164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Wang Yang, Wu Shuang, Chen Zhiyin, Gao Xiaofeng, and Chen Guihai. 2017. Coverage problem with uncertain properties in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks 123, August 2017 (2017), 200232. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128617301998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Xing Guoliang, Wang Xiaorui, Zhang Yuanfang, Lu Chenyang, Pless Robert, and Gill Christopher. 2005. Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration for energy conservation in sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 1, 1 (2005), 3672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Xu Ying, Ding Ou, Qu Rong, Li Keqin. 2018. Hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithms based on decomposition for wireless sensor network coverage optimization. Applied Soft Computing 68, July 2018 (2018), 268282. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568494618301868.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Yang S., Dai F., Cardei M., and Wu J.. 2006. On connected multiple point coverage in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks 13, 4 (2006), 289301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Ye Fan, Zhong Geng, Lu Songwu, and Zhang Lixia. 2002. PEAS: A robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols. DOI: Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Yener Bülent, Magdon-Ismail Malik, and Sivrikaya Fikret. 2007. Joint problem of power optimal connectivity and coverage in wireless sensor networks. ACM Wireless Networks, 13, 4 (2007), 537--550. .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Yu Jiguo, Deng Xiu, Yu Dongxiao, Wang Guanghui, and Gu Xin. 2013. CWSC: Connected k-coverage working sets construction algorithm in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Electronics and Communications 67, 11 (2013), 937946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Zhang Honghai and Hou Jennifer C.. 2005. Maintaining sensing coverage and connectivity in large sensor networks. Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks Journal 1, 1–2 (2005), 89124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhou Gang, He Tian, Krishnamurthy Sudha, and Stankovic John A.. 2006. Models and solutions for radio irregularity in wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 2, 2 (2006), 221262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Zhou Zongheng, Das Samir, and Gupta Himanshu. 2004. Connected k-coverage problem in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks. Rosemont, Illinois, 373378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Zou Yi and Chakrabarty Krishnendu. 2005. A distributed coverage- and connectivity-centric technique for selecting active nodes in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers 54, 8 (2005), 978991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Zhou Zongheng, Das Samir, and Gupta Himanshu. 2005. Fault tolerant connected sensor cover with variable sensing and transmission ranges. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh, and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks. California, 594604.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilson. 2022. Retrieved May 27, 2022 from http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/EMAT6680Su12/Carreras/EMAT6690/Essay2/essay2.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Computational Geometry-based Approach for Planar k-Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
            ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 19, Issue 2
            May 2023
            599 pages
            ISSN:1550-4859
            EISSN:1550-4867
            DOI:10.1145/3575873
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 February 2023
            • Online AM: 26 September 2022
            • Accepted: 15 August 2022
            • Revised: 6 June 2022
            • Received: 17 November 2021
            Published in tosn Volume 19, Issue 2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Full Text

          View this article in Full Text.

          View Full Text

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format