Stuart K. Card
Thomas P. Moran
Allen Newell
- 1 Card. S.K. Studies in the psychology of computer text-editing systems. Ph.D. Th. Dept. of Psychol., Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Pa., May 1978.Google Scholar
- 2 Card, S.K., English. W.K., and Burr, B.J. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21 (1978), 601-613.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3 Card, S.K., Moran, W,P., and Newell, A. The keystroke-level model of user performance time with interactive systems. Rep. SSL- 79-1, Xerox, Palo Alto Res. Ctr., Palo Alto, Ca., March 1979.Google Scholar
- 4 Card. S.K., Moran, T.P., and Newell, A Computer text-editing: An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychol. 12 (1980). 32-74.Google Scholar
- 5 Card. S.K., Moran, T.P., and Newell, A. Applied Information Processing Psychology: The Human-Computer Interface. Erlbaum, Hillsdale. N.J. (in preparation).Google Scholar
- 6 Chase, W.G. and Simon. H.A. Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychol. 4 (1973), 55-81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7 Deutsch. P.L., and Lampson. B.W. An online editor. Comm. ACM 10, 12 (Dec. 1967), 793-799. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8 Devoe, D.B. Alteratives to handprinting in the manual entry of data. IEEE Trans. HFE-8 (1967), 21-32.Google Scholar
- 9 Embley, D.W., Lan, M.T., Leinbaugh. D.W., and Nagy, G. A procedure for predicting program editor performance from the user's point of view. Internat. J. Man-Machine Studies 10 (1978), 639-650.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10 Maynard, H.B. Industrial Engineering Handbook. McGraw-Hill. New York, 3rd ed., 1971.Google Scholar
- 11 Moran T.P. The command language grammar: A representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems, Internat. J. Man-Machine Studies (in press).Google Scholar
- 12 Myer, T.H., and Barnaby, J.R. Tenex executive language manual for users. Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc., Cambridge. Mass., 1973.Google Scholar
- 13 Newman, W., and Sproull, R. Principles of Interactive Computer Graphics, McGraw-Hill New York, 2nd ed., 1979. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14 Pew, R.W. Baron, S., Feehrer, C.E., and Miller, D.C. Critical review and analysis of performance models applicable to manmachine systems evaluation. Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., 1977.Google Scholar
- 15 Ramsey, H.R., and Atwood, M.E. Human factors in computer systems: A review of the literature. Science Applications, Inc., Englewood, Colorado, 1979.Google Scholar
- 16 Savitsky. S., Son of STOPGAP Rep. SAILON 50.1, Stanford Artif. Intell. Lab., Stanford, Ca., 1969.Google Scholar
- 17 Simon, H.A. How big is a chunk? Science 183 (1974), 482-488.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18 Wainer, H. Estimating coefficients in linear models: It don't make no nevermmd. Psychol. Bull. 83 (1976), 213-217.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
The University of Alberta user interface management system
In this paper the design and implementation of the University of Alberta user interface management system (UIMS) is discussed. This UIMS is based on the Seeheim model of user interfaces, which divides the user interface into three separate components. ...
A Pen-Based Prosodic User Interface for Schoolchildren
A prosodic user interface is defined as an user interface that can deal with not only what is entered by the user but also how it is entered. A pen-based user interface provides more prosodic information than a mouse-based graphical user interface. The ...
The evaluation of text editors: methodology and empirical results.
This paper presents a methodology for evaluating text editors on several dimensions: the time it takes experts to perform basic editing tasks, the time experts spend making and correcting errors, the rate at which novices learn to perform basic editing ...
Comments