skip to main content
10.1145/380752.380758acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Quantum walks on graphs

Published:06 July 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

We set the ground for a theory of quantum walks on graphs-the generalization of random walks on finite graphs to the quantum world. Such quantum walks do not converge to any stationary distribution, as they are unitary and reversible. However, by suitably relaxing the definition, we can obtain a measure of how fast the quantum walk spreads or how confined the quantum walk stays in a small neighborhood. We give definitions of mixing time, filling time, dispersion time. We show that in all these measures, the quantum walk on the cycle is almost quadratically faster then its classical correspondent. On the other hand, we give a lower bound on the possible speed up by quantum walks for general graphs, showing that quantum walks can be at most polynomially faster than their classical counterparts.

References

  1. {1} D. Aharonov, A. Kitaev, and N. Nisan. Quantum circuits with mixed states. Proceedings of STOC'98, pp. 20-30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. {2} A. Ambainis, E. Bach, A. Nayak, A. Vishwanath, J. Watrous, One-dimensional quantum walks. Proceedings of STOC'01. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. {3} F. Chen, L. Lovasz and I. Pak, Lifting Markov chains to speed up mixing, Proceedings of STOC'99, pp. 275-281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. {4} A. Childs, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, An example of a difference between quantum and classical random walks. LANL preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0103020. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. {5} E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, Quantum computation and decision trees, Physical Review A, 58: 915-928, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. {6} L. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search Proceedings of STOC'96, pp. 212-219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. {7} L. Lovasz and P. Winkler, Mixing times, in Microsurveys in Discrete Probability, Dimacs Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, 41, eds. D. Aldous and J. Propp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. {8} M. Nielsen, I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. {9} P. Shor, Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM J. Comp., 26 : 1484-1509, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. {10} A. Sinclair, Algorithms for Random Generation and Counting, a Markov Chain Approach, Birkhauser, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. {11} A. Sinclair and M. Jerrum, Approximate counting, generation, and rapidly mixing Markov chains, Information and Computation, 82 : 93-133, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Quantum walks on graphs

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          STOC '01: Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
          July 2001
          755 pages
          ISBN:1581133499
          DOI:10.1145/380752

          Copyright © 2001 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 July 2001

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          STOC '01 Paper Acceptance Rate83of230submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

          Upcoming Conference

          STOC '24
          56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
          June 24 - 28, 2024
          Vancouver , BC , Canada

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader