Roger Clarke
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Data surveillance is now supplanting conventional surveillance techniques. With this trend come new monitoring methods such as personal dataveillance and mass dataveillance that require more effective safeguards and a formal policy framework.
- 1 Ackroyd, C., Margolis, K., Rosenhead, J., and Shallice, T. The Technology of Political Control. Penguin Books, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
- 2 Askin, F. SurveilIance: The social science perspective. Columbia Hum. Rights Law Rev. 4, 1 (Winter 1972), (see also the remainder of the issue).Google Scholar
- 3 Australian Science and Technology Council, Towards a Cashless Society. ASTEC, Canberra Australia, May 1986.Google Scholar
- 4 Bramford, J. The Puzzle Palace. Penguin Books, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
- 5 Brenton, M. The Privacy Invaders. Coward-McCann, 1964.Google Scholar
- 6 Burnham, D. The Rise of the Computer State. Random House/Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7 Campbell, D., and Connor, S. On the Record. Michael Joseph, 1986.Google Scholar
- 8 Chaum, D. Security without identification: Transaction systems to make Big Brother obsolete. Commun. ACM 28, 10 (Oct. 1985), 1030-1044. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9 Clarke, R.A. lust another piece of plastic for your wallet: The Australia card scheme. Prometheus 5, 1 (June 1987}, 29-45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10 Clarke, R.A. Judicial understanding of information technology.Google Scholar
- 11 Cowen, Z. The Private Man. Australian Broadcasting Commission, 1969.Google Scholar
- 12 Crispin A. Who's Watching You. Penguin Books, New York, 1981,Google Scholar
- 13 Donner, F.J. The Age of Surveillance. Knopf, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
- 14 Early, P. Big Brother makes a date. San Francisco Exam. (Oct. 12, 1986).Google Scholar
- 15 Ellul, J. The Technological Society. Knopf, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
- 16 Greenberg, D.H., and Wolf, D.A. Is wage matching worth all the trouble? Public Welfare (Winter 1985), 13-20.Google Scholar
- 17 Greenleaf, G.W., and Clarke, R.A. Database retrieval technology and subject access principles. Aust. Comput. {. 16, I (Feb. 1984), 27-32.Google Scholar
- 18 Greenleaf, G.W., and Clarke, R.A. Aspects of the Australian Law Reform Commission's information privacy proposals. J. Law and Inf. Sci. 2, 1 (Aug. 1986), 83-110.Google Scholar
- 19 Gross, M.L. The Brain Watchers. Signet, 1963.Google Scholar
- 20 Hoffman, L.J., Ed. Computers and Privacy in the Next Decade. Academic Press, New York, 1980. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21 Huxley, A. Brave New World. Penguin Books, New York, 1975 (originally published in 1932).Google Scholar
- 22 Kircher, J. A history of computer matching in federal government programs. Computerworld (Dec. 14, 1981).Google Scholar
- 23 Kling, R. Automated welfare client-tracking and service integration: The political economy of computing. Commun. ACM 21, 6 (June 1978), 484-493. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24 Kling, R. Value conflicts and social choice in electronic funds transfer system developments. Commun. ACM 21, 8 (Aug. 1978), 642-657. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25 Kusserow, R.P. The government needs computer matching to root out waste and fraud. Commun. ACM 27, 6 (June 1984}, 542-545. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26 Langan, K.J. Computer matching programs: A threat to privacy? Co tumbia J. Law Sac. Probl. 15, 2 (1979).Google Scholar
- 27 Laudon, K.C. Computers and Bureaucratic Reform. Wiley, New York, 19'74.Google Scholar
- 28 Laudon, K.C. Complexity in large federal databanks. Soc./Trans. (May 1979).Google Scholar
- 29 Laudon, K.C. Problems of accountability in federal databanks. In Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (May). American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1979.Google Scholar
- 30 Laudom K.C. Data quality and due process in large interorganizational record systems. Commun. ACM 29. 1 (Jan. 1986), 4-12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 31 Laudon. K.C. Dossier Society, Value Choices in the Design of National Injormation Systems. Columbia University Press, New York, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 32 Long, E.V. The Intruders. Praeger, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
- 33 Marx, G.T. The new surveillance. Technol. Rev. (May-June 1985).Google Scholar
- 34 Marx, G.T. I'll be watching you: Reflections on the new surveillance. Dissent (Winter 1985).Google Scholar
- 35 Marx, G.T., and Reichman, N. Routinising the discovery of secrets. Am. Behav. Sci. 27, 4 (Mar.-Apr. 1984), 423-452.Google Scholar
- 36 Miller, A.R. The Assault on Privacy. Mentor, 1972.{Google Scholar
- 37 Neier, A. Dossier. Stein and Day, 1974.Google Scholar
- 38 New South Wales Privacy Committee. Guidelines for the Operation of Personal Data Systems. NSWPC, Sydney, Australia, 1977.Google Scholar
- 39 Office of Management and Budget. Guidelines to Agencies on Conductin~t Automated Matching Programs. OMB, Mar. 1979.Google Scholar
- 40 Office of Management and Budget. Computer Matching Guidelines. OMB, May 1982.Google Scholar
- 41 Office of Management and Budget President's Commission for Integrity and Efficiency. Model Control System for Conducting Computer Matching Projects Involving Individual Privacy Data. OMB/PCIE, 1983.Google Scholar
- 42 Office of Technology Assessment. Federal government information technology: Electronic surveillance and civil liberties. OTA-CIT-293, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C., Oct. 1985.Google Scholar
- 43 Office of Technology Assessment. Federal government information technology: Electronic record systems and individual privacy. OTA- CIT-296, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C., June 1986.Google Scholar
- 44 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guidelines for the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Da'ta. OECD, Paris, France, 1980.Google Scholar
- 45 Orwell, G. 1984. Penguin Books, New York, 1972 (originally published in 1948).{Google Scholar
- 46 O:~ford Dictionary. Vol. X 1933, p. 248.Google Scholar
- 47 Packard, V. The Naked Society. McKay, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
- 48 Privacy Protection Study Commission. Personal Privacy in an Information Society. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., July 1977.Google Scholar
- 49 Raines, J.C. Attack on Privacy. Judson Press, 1974.Google Scholar
- 50 Reichman, N., and Marx, G.T. Generating organisational disputes: The impact of computerization. In Proceedings of the I,aw and Society Association Conference (San Diego, Calif., June 6-9). Law and Society Association, 1985.Google Scholar
- 51 Rodota, S. Privacy and data surveillance: Growing public concern. Inf. Stud. 10, OECD, Paris, France, 1976.Google Scholar
- 52 Rosenberg, J.M. The Death of Privacy. Random House, 1969.Google Scholar
- 53 Rosenberg, R.S. Computers and the Information Society. Wiley, New York, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 54 Roszak, T. The Cult of Information. Pantheon, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 55 Rule, J.B. Private Lives and Public Surveillance: Social Control in the Computer Age. Schocken Books, 1974.Google Scholar
- 56 Rule, J.B. Value Choices in E.F.T.S. Office of Telecommunications Policy, Washington, D.C., 1975.Google Scholar
- 57 Rule, J.B. 1984-The ingredients of totalitarianism. In 1984 Revisited-Totalitarianism in Our Century. Harper and Row, New York, 1983, pp. 166-179.{Google Scholar
- 58 Rule, J.B. Documentary identification and mass surw:illance in the United States5 Sac. Probl. 31,222 (1983).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 59 Rule, J.B., McAdam, D., Stearns, L. and Uglow, D. The Politics of Privacy. New American Library, 1980.Google Scholar
- 60 Russell, B. Authority and the Individual. George Allen and Unwin, 1949.Google Scholar
- 61 Shaltuck, J. Computer matching is a serious threat to individual rights. Commun. ACM 27, 6 (June 1984), 538-541. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 62 Stone, M.G. Computer Privacy. Anbar, 1968.Google Scholar
- 63 Thom, J. and Thorne. P. Privacy legislation and the right of access. Aust. Comput. J. 15, 4 (Nov. 1983), 145-150.Google Scholar
- 64 Thompson, A.A. A Big Brother in Britain Today. Michael Joseph, 1970.Google Scholar
- 65 U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Computer Matching in State Administered Benefit Programs: A Manager's Guide to Decision-Making. HEW, Washington, D.C., 1983.Google Scholar
- 66 U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Computer Matching in State Administered Benefit Programs. HEW, Washington, D.C., June 1984.Google Scholar
- 67 U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems. Re:'ords, Computers and the Rights of Citizens. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1973.Google Scholar
- 68 U.S. Federal Advisory Committee on False Identifical. ion. The Criminal Use of False Identification. FACFI, Washington, D.C., 1976.Google Scholar
- 69 U.S. Senate. Oversight of Computer Matching to Detect Fraud and Mismanagement in Government Programs. U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., 1982.Google Scholar
- 70 Warner, M., and Stone, M. The Data Bank Society: Organisations, Computers and Social Freedom. George Allen and Unwin, 1970.Google Scholar
- 71 Webster's 3rd Edition. 1976, p. 2302.Google Scholar
- 72 Weeramantry, C.G. The Slumbering Sentinels: Law and Human Rights in the Wake of Technology. Penguin Books. New York, 1983.Google Scholar
- 73 Wessell, M.R. Freedom's Edge: The Computer Threat to Society. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1974.Google Scholar
- 74 Westin, A.F. Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
- 75 Westin, A.F., Ed. Information Technology in a Democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 76 Westin, A.F., and Baker, M. Databanks in a Free Society. Quadrangle, New York. 1974.Google Scholar
- 77 Yestingsmeier, J. Electronic funds transfer systems: 'the continuing need for privacy legislation. Comput. Sac. 13.4 (Winter 1984), 5-9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 78 Zamyatin, Y. We. Penguin Books, New York, 1983 (originally published in Russian, 1920).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Information technology and dataveillance
Recommendations
Dataveillance imaginaries and their role in chilling effects online
Highlights- Self-inhibition due to dataveillance is defined as chilling effects of dataveillance.
- Dataveillance imaginaries affect internet users’ self-inhibition of digital communication.
- Dataveillance imaginaries include actors, workings, ...
AbstractThe automatic tracing and analysis of personal data on the internet is a common occurrence. So far, the extent of internet users’ sense of such dataveillance and reactions to it remain obscure. This article explores 1) internet users’ ...
Reviews
John W. Fendrich
This paper discusses the issues of surveillance in society. It emphasizes the ways information technology (IT) influences and stimulates surveillance. Definitions of surveillance, dataveillance, personal surveillance, and mass surveillance are presented. The author attempts to maintain a detached point of view, not claiming that surveillance is evil or undesirable. However, he asserts that IT is being applied to surveillance techniques with few guidelines or restraints and with limited regard to correctness, cost, or effectiveness. He calls for a harnessing of IT's decentralized potential in surveillance, and for more recognition of the implications of the application of IT in surveillance for a human-oriented society. The paper identifies many interesting issues and problems; however, it does not offer an effective, practical methodology to deal with the concerns it raises. The paper provides an introductory overview and review of the opinions and case studies provided in its long list of references. It is appropriate for information technologists and anyone interested in the social and ethical implications of applied information technology. The study of this paper could be the basis for personal reflection on strategies to address the issues it raises. I hope that, with the spate of papers of this genre, methodologies that combine IT and social values will be forthcoming that are adaptive to organizations and individuals and that meet their requirements.
Access critical reviews of Computing literature here
Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.
Comments