skip to main content
10.1145/642611.642666acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Are informal tools better?: comparing DEMAIS, pencil and paper, and authorware for early multimedia design

Published:05 April 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

DEMAIS is an informal design tool that we claim helps a multimedia designer explore and communicate temporal and interactive (behavioral) design ideas better than existing tools. This paper seeks to empirically validate our claim. We report on an evaluation comparing DEMAIS to pencil and paper and Authorware for the exploration and communication of behavior in early multimedia design. The main results are that (i) DEMAIS was better than Authorware for both exploring and communicating behavior, (ii) DEMAIS was better than pencil and paper for communicating behavior, and (iii) DEMAIS was able to capture most of a designer's behavioral design ideas. Our results show that DEMAIS bridges the early investment/communication gap that exists among current multimedia design tools.

References

  1. Bailey, B.P. DEMAIS: A Behavior-Sketching Tool for Early Multimedia Design. PhD Thesis, Univ. of Minnesota, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bailey, B.P., J.A. Konstan and J.V. Carlis. DEMAIS: Designing Multimedia Applications with Interactive Storyboards. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, 2001, pp. 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bailey, B.P., J.A. Konstan and J.V. Carlis. Supporting Multimedia Designers: Towards More Effective Design Tools. In Proceedings of Multimedia Modeling, 2001, pp. 267--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, B.P. and J.A. Konstan. Authoring Interactive Media. Encyc. Elec. and Electronics Eng., John Wiley & Sons, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gross, M.D. and E.Y. Do. Ambiguous Intentions: A Paper-like Interface for Creative Design. In Proceedings User Interface and Software Technology, 1996, pp. 183--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Herbsleb, J.D. and E. Kuwana. Preserving Knowledge in Design Projects: What Designers Need to Know. In Proceedings of CHI'93, pp. 7--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Klemmer, S., et al. The Designers' Outpost: A Tangible Interface for Collaborative Web Site Design. In Proceedings of UIST, 2001, pp. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Landay, J.A. and B. Myers. Interactive Sketching for the Early Stages of User Interface Design. In Proc. CHI'95, pp. 43--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lewis, M., W. Clark and B. Devoto (Editor). The Journals of Lewis and Clark. Houghton Mifflin Co, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin, J., M. Thomsen and J.A. Landay. A Visual Sketching Language for Sketching Large and Complex Interactive Designs. In Proc. CHI'02, pp. 307--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lin, J., M.W. Newman, J.I. Hong and J.A. Landay. DENIM: Finding a Tighter Fit Between Tools and Practice for Web Site Design. In Proc. CHI'00, pp. 510--517. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mackay, W.E., A.V. Ratzer and P. Janecek. Video artifacts for Design: Bridging the Gap Between Abstraction and Detail. Designing Interactive Systems, 2000, pp. 72--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Newman, M.W. and J.A. Landay. Sitemaps, Storyboards, and Specifications: A Sketch of Web Site Design Practice. Designing Interactive Systems, 2000, pp. 263--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rieber, L.P. Getting Interactive with Authorware: Building Simulations and Games. http://www.nowhereroad.com/authorware/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rudd, J., K. Stern and S. Isensee. The Low vs. High-Fidelity Prototyping Debate. Interactions, 3 (1): 76--85, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Strothotte, T., B. Preim, A. Raab, J. Schumann and D.R. Forsey. How to Render Frames and Influence People. In Proc. Eurographics '94, pp. 455--466.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Zeleznik, R.C., et al. SKETCH: An Interface for Sketching 3D Scenes. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1996, pp. 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Are informal tools better?: comparing DEMAIS, pencil and paper, and authorware for early multimedia design

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2003
          620 pages
          ISBN:1581136307
          DOI:10.1145/642611

          Copyright © 2003 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 April 2003

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '03 Paper Acceptance Rate75of468submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader