skip to main content
article
Free Access

Improving a human-computer dialogue

Published:01 March 1990Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A survey of seventy-seven highly motivated industrial designers and programmers indicates that the identification of specific, potential problems in a human-computer dialogue design is difficult.

References

  1. 1 Apple Computer Co, Apple Human lntcrface Guidelines. The Apple Dt'sktop Inter!etc. Adctison Wesley, Waltham, .Mass., 1!'187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Carroll, I. M. and Aaronson, A. P. Learning by doing with simulated intelligent help. Commun. ACM 31. :) {Supt. 1.t!88), 10ti4-'l()7.t). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 Gould. 1. D. et al. The 1984 Olympic Message System: A test of behavioral principles of system design. Commun. ACM 30, '.) (Sept. 111871, 758-76.9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4 Gould. J. I)., and l,ewis, C. Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Commu~l. ACM 28. 3 (Mar. 1985}. 300-.'.111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5 IBM Corp. Systems Application Architecture. Cot!lttlOtl User Access Panel Design and User Interaction. SC26-4351-0, '1987.{Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Molich, R., and Nielsen. J. Det uofficielle DM i dialogwirdering (in Danish}. Computworld Denmark INlay 6, 1,c.~88), 28-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Nielsen, L, Ed. Coordimzting User Interfaces for Consistencl/. Academic Press. New York, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8 Nielsen. J. Ed. Designing User Interfaces for lntcrnational Llsc. l:,lsevie, r Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9 Shneiderman. B. Designing computer system messages. Commun. ACM 25, 9 (Sept. 1,q82), 610-6'! 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 Smith, S. L., and Mosier, 1. Design guidelines for user-system interface software. Rep. No. ESD-TR-86-278, MTR-100,~6, The Mitre Corporation. 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Improving a human-computer dialogue

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        James Clinton Spohrer

        A well-designed human-computer interface is important to the competitiveness as well as the usability of commercial software. A survey was designed to investigate how well highly motivated software professionals can identify problems in a simple but realistic human-computer interface design. On average, those surveyed found only 37 percent of the 30 design problems. No one found more than 60 percent of the design problems. The results of the survey demonstrate the need for better training and job aids to help software professionals identify human-computer interface design problems. Readers interested in human-computer interface design may enjoy doing the survey exercise, which is reproduced in the paper. The paper should be especially valuable to instructors interested in teaching better human-computer interface design skills and to software professionals interested in improving their design skills. The main problem with the paper is the simplistic and dated interface design example.

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader