Andrew Gemino
Abstract
To compare modeling techniques, combine grammar-based and cognitive-based approaches and test domain understanding.
- Batra, D., Hoffer, J., and Bostrom, R. Comparing representations with relational and EER models. Commun. ACM 33, 2 (Feb. 1990), 126--139. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M., and Weber, R. Should optional properties be used in conceptual modeling? A theory and three empirical tests. Info. Syst. Res. 12, 4 (Dec. 2001), 384--405. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brooks, F. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays of Software Engineering, Anniversary Edition. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burton-Jones, A. and Meso, P. How good are these UML diagrams? An empirical test of the Wand and Weber Good Decomposition Model. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems 2002, L. Applegate, R. Galliers, and J. DeGross, Eds. (Barcelona, Spain, Dec. 15--18, 2002).Google Scholar
- Gemino, A. Empirical Comparison of System Analysis Techniques. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, June 1998.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mayer, R. Models for understanding. Rev. Edu. Res. 59, 1 (spring 1989), 43--64.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oei, J., van Hemmen, L., Falkenberg, E., and Brinkkemper, S. The Meta Model Hierarchy: A Framework for Information Systems Concepts and Techniques. Tech. Rep. No. 92-17, Department of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Katholieke Universiteir, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, July 1992, 1--30.Google Scholar
- Standish Group International, Inc. Chaos 1994: Standish Group Report on Information System Development. Yarmouth, MA, 1995; see www.pm2go.com/sample_research/chaos_1994_1.php.Google Scholar
- Vessey, I. and Conger, S. Requirements specification: Learning object, process, and data methodologies. Commun. ACM 37, 5 (May 1994), 102--113. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wand, Y. and Weber, R. Information systems and conceptual modeling: A research agenda. Info. Syst. Res. 13, 4 (Dec. 2002), 203--223. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wand, Y. and Weber, R. On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. J. Info. Syst. 3 (1993), 217--237.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning
Recommendations
Exploring Multi-Paradigm Modeling Techniques
Multi-Paradigm Modeling (MPM) addresses the necessity of using multiple modeling paradigms when designing complex systems. Because of its multidisciplinary nature, the MPM field involves research teams with technical backgrounds as different as control ...
Exploiting product forms solution techniques in multiformalism modeling
Multiformalism modeling has shown to be a valuable technique to cope with the complexity of the constraints that apply to specifications of computer-based systems state of the art. Multiformalism techniques help modelers and designers by providing a ...
Modeling difficulties in creating conceptual data models: Multimodal studies on individual modeling processes
AbstractConceptual modeling is a learning task essential to students of computer science, software engineering and related programs. Construed as a complex task, surprisingly little is known about the actual act of conceptual modeling, and about modeling ...
Comments