skip to main content
10.1145/96877.96943acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

An improvement of the projection operator in cylindrical algebraic decomposition

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 July 1990Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition (CAD) method of Collins [5] decomposes r-dimensional Euclidean space into regions over which a given set of polynomials have constant signs. An important component of the CAD method is the projection operation: given a set A of r-variate polynomials, the projection operation produces a set P of (r - 1)-variate polynomials such that a CAD of r-dimensional space for A can be constructed from a CAD of (r-1)-dimensional space for P. In this paper, we present an improvement to the projection operation. By generalizing a lemma on which the proof of the original projection operation is based, we are able to find another projection operation which produces a smaller number of polynomials. Let m be the number of polynomials contained in A, and let n be a bound for the degree of each polynomial in A in the projection variable. The number of polynomials produced by the original projection operation is dominated by m2n3 whereas the number of polynomials produced by our projection operation is dominated by m2n2.

References

  1. 1.D.S. Arnon, G. E. Collins, and S. McCMlum. Cylindrical algebraic decomposition I: The basic algorithm. Technical Report CSD-427, Computer Science Dept, Purdue U aiversity, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.D.S. Arnon, G. E. Collins, and S. McCailum. Cylindrical algebraic decomposition I: The basic algorithm. SIAM J. Comp,, 13:865-877, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.D. S. Arnon and M. Mignotte. On mechanical quantifier elimination for elementary algebra and geometry. J. $1trnboli~ Comp., 5(1,2):237-260, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.G. E. Collins and R. Loos. The ALDES-SAC2 computer algebra system. Technical report, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.George E. Collins. Quantifier elimination for the elementary theory of real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In Lecture Note8 In Computer Science, pages 134-183. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975. Vol. 35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.George E. Collins and H oon H ong. Partial cad construction in quantifier elimination. Technical Report OSU- CISRC-10/89 TR45, Computer Science Dept, The Ohio State University, 1989. Submitted to Journal of Symbolic Computation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.James H. Davenport and Joos Heintz. Real quantifier elimination is doubly exponential. J. Symbolic Comp., 5(1,2), 19ss. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Hoon Hong. An improvement of the projection operator in cylindrical algebraic decomposition. Technical Report OSU-CISRC-12/89 TR55, Computer Science Dept, The Ohio State University, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.$. McC~llum. An Imp,o,~d P,ojection Operator for Cylindrical Algebraic Decompoaition. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An improvement of the projection operator in cylindrical algebraic decomposition

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISSAC '90: Proceedings of the international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation
        July 1990
        307 pages
        ISBN:0201548925
        DOI:10.1145/96877

        Copyright © 1990 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 July 1990

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate395of838submissions,47%

        Upcoming Conference

        ISSAC '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader