skip to main content
10.1145/97243.97271acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 1990Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is impossible to design systems which are appropriate for all users and all situations. We believe that a useful technique is to have end users tailor their systems to match their personal work practices. This requires not only systems which can be tailored, but a culture within which users feel in control of the system and in which tailoring is the norm. In a two-pronged research project we have worked closely with a group of users to develop a system to support tailoring and to help the users evolve a “tailoring culture”. This has resulted in a flexible system based around the use of distributed on-screen Buttons to support a range of tailoring techniques.

References

  1. 1.AshtomTate. Framework II Reference Manual. 1986.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.B0dker, S., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Kyng, M. and Sundblad, Yngve. A UTOPIAN experience: On the design of powerful computer based tools for skilled graphic workers. {n Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. (Eds) Computers and Democracy - A Scandinavian Challenge, Avebury, Aldershot, England, 1987.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Bobrow, D.G. and Stefik, M. The LOOPS Manual. Tech Rep. KB-VLSI-81-13. Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 1981.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Borning, A. Classes versus prototypes in object-oriented languages. In Proc ACM/IEEE Fall Joint Computer Conference, (Dallas, Nov 1986), 36-40, 1986.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Borning, A. and O'Shea, T. An empirically and aesthetically motivated simplification of Smalltalk-80. Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, (Paris, June 1987), 155-165, 1987.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Carter, K. Two Conceptions of Designing. IRIS Conference on '~'reativity in System Development". 1989.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Carter, K. Methods for designing with users. PICT workshop on Social perspecti'ves on Software. UMIST, Manchester, July 19-20 1989.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.DiSessa, A. A principled design for an integrated computational environment. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 1-47, 1985.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. The collective resource approach to systems design. In Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. (Eds) Computers and Democracy . A Scandinavian Challenge, Avebury, Aldershot, England, 1987.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Fischer, G. and Lemke, A. Construction kits and design environments: Steps toward human problem-domain communication. Human. Computer Interaction, 3, 179-222, 1988.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Goldberg, A. and Robson, D. Smaltt~alk-80, the language and its implementation. Addison- Wesley Publishing Co., 1983.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Goodman, D. The complete HyperCard handbook. Bantam Books, New York. 1987.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Grudin, J. and Barnard, P. When does an abbreviation become a word? And related questions. In Proc CHI'85 (San Francisco), ACM, New York, 121-125, 1985.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Henderson, A. and Card, S~ Rooms:: The use of multiple virtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window based graphical user interface. ACM Transactions on Graphics.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Lieberman, H. Using prototypical objects to implement shared behavior in object-oriented systems. In Proceedings of OOPSLA ~7, ACM Press New York, 214-223, 1987.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.LSvstrand, L. Buttons" An object-oriented architecture to support tailorability. In preparation.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.MacLean, A. Human factors and the design of user interface management systems: EASIE as a case study. Information and Software Technology, 29,192-201, 1987.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.MacLean, A., Barnard, P. and Wilson, M. Rapid prototyping of dialogue for human factors research: The EASIE approach. In Harrison, M and Monk, A. (Eds.) People and Computers: Designing for Usability. CUP, Cambridge, 180-195, 1986.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.MacLean, A., Young, R. and Moran, T. Design Rationale: The argument behind the artifact. In Proc. CHI'89, Austin, Texas, April 30-May 4, ACM, New York, 247-252, 1989.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Myers, B. Visual programming, programming by example, and program visu.alisation; a taxonomy. In Proc CHI'86 (Boston, MA. April 13-16), 59-66, 1986.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Rich, C. and Waters, R. Automatic programming: Myths and Prospects. IEEE Computer, August, 42-51, 1988.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Ritchie, R. and Weir, G. Menu-based extensions to GNU Emacs. In Sutcliffe, A. and Macaulay, L. (Eds.) People and Computers V. CUP, Cambridge, 245-260, 1989.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.Stallmaa, R. EMACS, the extensibte, customizable, self-documenting display editor. Proc ACM SIGPLAN SIGOA Symposoium on Text Manipulation. Portland, Oregon, June, 1981.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.Trigg, R, Moran, T. and Halasz, F. Adaptability and Tailorability in NoteCards. In Bullinger, H.-J. and Shackel, B. (Eds.) Proceedings of INTERACTS7, London, 723-728, 1987.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Xerox Corporation. ViewPoint CUSP Button Reference. ViewPoint Series Reference Library. 1988.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '90: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          March 1990
          474 pages
          ISBN:0201509326
          DOI:10.1145/97243

          Copyright © 1990 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 March 1990

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '90 Paper Acceptance Rate47of260submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader