skip to main content
article

Modeling train movements through complex rail networks

Published:01 January 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Trains operating in densely populated metropolitan areas typically encounter complex trackage configurations. To make optimal use of the available rail capacity, some portions of the rail network may consist of single-track lines while other locations may consist of double- or triple-track lines. Because of varying local conditions, different points in the rail network may have different speed limits. We formulate a graphical technique for modeling such complex rail networks; and we use this technique to develop a deadlock-free algorithm for dispatching each train to its destination with nearly minimal travel time while (a) abiding by the speed limits at each point on each train's route, and (b) maintaining adequate headways between trains. We implemented this train-dispatching algorithm in a simulation model of the movements of passenger and freight trains in Los Angeles County, and we validated the simulation as yielding an adequate approximation to the current system performance.

References

  1. Bueche, F., Hecht, E., and Bueche, F. J. 1997. Schaum's Outline of College Physics. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Carey, M. 1994. A model, algorithm and strategy for train pathing, with choice of lines, platforms and routes. Trans. Res. 28(B), 333--353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng, Y. 1998. Hybrid simulation for resolving resource conflicts in train traffic rescheduling. Comput., Indust. 35, 3, 233--246. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dessouky, M. M. and Leachman, R. C. 1995. A simulation modeling methodology for analyzing large complex rail networks. Simulation 65, 2, 131--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dessouky, M. M., Leachman, R. C., and Lu, Q. 2002. Using simulation modeling to assess rail track infrastructure in densely trafficked metropolitan areas. In Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference (San Diego, CA, Dec.), E. Yücesan, C.-H. Chen, J. L. Snowdon, and J. M. Carnes, Eds. Winter Simulation Conference, Piscataway, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Habermann, A. N. 1969. Prevention of system deadlocks. Commun. ACM 12, 373--377. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Higgins, A. and Kozan, E. 1998. Modeling train delays in urban networks. Transport. Sci. 32, 4, 346--357. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Komaya, K. 1991. A new simulation method and its application to knowledge-based systems for railway scheduling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME Joint Railway Conference (St. Louis, MO, May). IEEE/ASME, New York, NY, 59--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawley, M. A. and Reveliotis, S. A. 2001. Deadlock avoidance for sequential resource allocation systems: Hard and easy cases. Internat. J. FMS 13, 4, 385--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Leachman, R. C. 1991. Railroad capacity and operations analysis for the Alameda Consolidated Transportation Corridor Project. Tech. rep. Leachman & Associates, Berkeley, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewellen, M. and Tumay, K. 1998. Networks simulation of a major railroad. In Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference (Washington, DC, Dec.), D. J. Medeiros, E. F. Watson, J. S. Carson, and M. S. Manivannan, Eds. Winter Simulation Conference, Piscataway, NJ, 1135--1138. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Petersen, E. R. and Taylor, A. J. 1982. A structured model for rail line simulation and optimization. Transport. Sci. 16, 2, 192--206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Vickerman, M. J. 1998. Next-generation container vessels: Impact on transportation infrastructure an operation. TR News 196, 3--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modeling train movements through complex rail networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
      ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation  Volume 14, Issue 1
      January 2004
      114 pages
      ISSN:1049-3301
      EISSN:1558-1195
      DOI:10.1145/974734
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 January 2004
      Published in tomacs Volume 14, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader