skip to main content
article

Motion to support rapid interactive queries on node--link diagrams

Published:01 July 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Many different problems can be represented as graphs displayed in the form of node--link diagrams. However, when a graph is large it becomes visually uninterpretable because of the tangle of links. We describe a set of techniques that use motion in an interactive interface to provide effective access to larger graphs. Touching a node with the mouse cursor causes that node and the subgraph of closely connected nodes to oscillate. We argue from perceptual principles that this should be a more effective way of interactively highlighting a subgraph than more conventional static methods. The MEGraph system was developed to gain experience with different forms of motion highlighting. Based on positive feedback, three experiments were carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of motion highlighting for specific tasks. All three showed motion to be more effective than static highlighting, both in increasing the speed of response for a variety of visual queries, and in reducing errors. We argue that motion highlighting can be a valuable technique in applications that require users to understand large graphs.

References

  1. Bartram, L., Ware, C., and Calvert, T. 2003. Moticons: Detection, distraction and task. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. (Special issue on Notifications and Interruptions) 58, 5, 515--545. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bartram, L. and Ware, C. 2002. Filtering and brushing with motion. Inf. Vis. 1, 1, 66--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Battista, G. D., Eades, P., Tamassia, R., and Tollis, I. G. 1999. Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Becker, R. A., Eick, S. G., and Wilks, A. R. 1995. Visualizing network data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 1, 1 (Mar.), 16--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Braddick, O. and Holliday, I. 1987. Serial search for targets defined by divergence or deformation of optic flow. Perception 20, 345--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Brandes, Y., Raab, J., and Wagner, D. 2001. Exploratory network visualization: Simultaneous display of status and connections. J. Social Struct. 2, 4, 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, C. and Paul, R. J. 2001. Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. IEEE Comput. 34, 65--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Driver, J., McLeod, P., and Dienes, Z. 1992. Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory. Percept. Psychophys. 51, 1, 79--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Driver, J. and McLeod, P. 1992. Reversing Visual Search Asymmetries with conjunctions of movement and orientation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 22--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fairchild, K. M., Poltrock, S. E. and Furnas, G. W. 1988. SemNet: Three-dimensional graphical representations of large knowledge bases. In Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human--Computer Interaction, R. Guindon, ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 201--233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. McLeod, P., Driver, J., and Crisp, J. 1988. Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature 332, 154--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Michotte, C. 1963. The Perception of Causality, Methuen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Miyashita, T. and Uchida, T. 1990. Cause of fatigue and its improvement in stereoscopic display. Proc. Soc. Inf. Disp. 31, 3, 249--254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Munzner, T., Guimbretiere, F., and Robertson, G. 1999. Constellation: A visualization tool for linguistic queries from MindNet. Proceedings IEEE Information Visualization.132--135. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Parker, G., Franck, G., and Ware, C. 1998. Visualization of large nested graphs in 3D. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 9, 299--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Sollenberger, R. L. and Milgram, P. 1993. A comparative study of rotational and stereoscopic computer graphic depth cues. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, September 2--6. 1452--1456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Treisman, A. 1988. Features a nd objects: The 14th Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 40, 201--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Treisman, A. and Gormican, S. 1991. Search, similarity and integration of features between and within dimensions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17, 3, 652--676.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ware, C., Bonner, J., Cater, R., and Knight, W. 1992. Simple animation as a human interrupt. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, 4, 341--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ware, C. and Franck, G. 1996. Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions. ACM Trans. Graph. 15, 2, 121--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Motion to support rapid interactive queries on node--link diagrams

          Recommendations

          Reviews

          Licia Calvi

          The issue of using motion to visualize a graph is discussed in this paper. This technique is claimed to be particularly useful in the presence of large graphs. The paper reports on three experiments where different forms of motion, combined with different forms of link or node highlighting, were tested. The results show that motion highlighting is very effective in graph interaction, when it is particularly large. Considering that using graphs as devices to visualize technical information is a very common practice, and that their design is deeply grounded in perceptual and neurophysiological theories, this paper presents very interesting and useful evidence to support the further development of graph interaction. Online Computing Reviews Service

          Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

          Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
            ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 1, Issue 1
            July 2004
            80 pages
            ISSN:1544-3558
            EISSN:1544-3965
            DOI:10.1145/1008722
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2004 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 2004
            Published in tap Volume 1, Issue 1

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader