skip to main content
article

Fluid control using the adjoint method

Published:01 August 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We describe a novel method for controlling physics-based fluid simulations through gradient-based nonlinear optimization. Using a technique known as the adjoint method, derivatives can be computed efficiently, even for large 3D simulations with millions of control parameters. In addition, we introduce the first method for the full control of free-surface liquids. We show how to compute adjoint derivatives through each step of the simulation, including the fast marching algorithm, and describe a new set of control parameters specifically designed for liquids.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. ADALSTEINSSON, D., AND SETHIAN, J. 1998. The Fast Construction of Extension Velocities in Level Set Methods. Journal of Computational Physics 148, 2--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. BRAZEL, R., HUGHES, J. F., AND WOOD, D. 1996. Plausible motion simulation for computer animation. In EGCAS '96: Seventh International Workshop on Computer Animation and Simulation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. BEWLEY, T. R., MOIN, P., AND TEMAM, R. 2001. Dns-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 447, 179--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. BEWLEY, T. R. 2002. The emerging roles of model-based control theory in fluid mechanics. In Advances in Turbulence IX. Proceedings of the Ninth European Turbulence Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CHENNEY, S., AND FORSYTH, D. A. 2000. Sampling Plausible Solutions to Multi-body Constraint Problems. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2000), ACM, 219--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. ENRIGHT, D., MARSCHNER, S., AND FEDKIW, R. 2002. Animation and Rendering of Complex Water Surfaces. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2002), ACM, 736--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. FATTAL, R., AND LISCHINSKI, D. 2004. Target-driven smoke animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 23, 3 (Aug.). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. FEDKIW, R., STAM, J., AND JENSEN, H. 2001. Visual Simulation of Smoke. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2001), ACM, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. FOSTER, N., AND FEDKIW, R. 2001. Practical Animation of Liquids. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2001), ACM, 23--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. FOSTER, N., AND METAXAS, D. 1996. Realistic Animation of Liquids. Graphical Models and Image Processing 58, 5, 471--483. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. FOSTER, N., AND METAXAS, D. 1997. Controlling fluid animation. Computer Graphics International, 178--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. FOSTER, N., AND METAXAS, D. 1997. Modeling the Motion of a Hot, Turbulent Gas. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 97), ACM, 181--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. GHIL, M., IDE, K., BENNETT, A. F., COURTIER, P., KIMOTO, M., AND (EDS.), N. S. 1997. Data Assimilation in Meteorology and Oceanography: Theory and Practice. Meteorological Society of Japan and Universal Academy Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. GILES, M. B., AND PIERCE, N. A. 2000. An introduction to the adjoint approach to design. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 65, 393--415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. GRIEWANK, A. 2000. Evaluating Derivatives, Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation. SIAM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. KAJIYA, J. T., AND VON HERZEN, B. P. 1984. Ray Tracing Volume Densities. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 84) 18, 3 (July), 165--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. KASS, M., AND MILLER, G. 1990. Rapid, Stable Fluid Dynamics for Computer Graphics. ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '90) 24, 4 (August), 49--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. KUNIMATSU, A., WATANABE, Y., FUJII, H., SAITO, T., AND HIWADA, K. 2001. Fast simulation and rendering techniques for fluid objects. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics) 20, 3, 357--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. LIONS, J. P. 1971. Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. MUELLER, M., CHARYPAR, D., AND GROSS, M. 2003. Particle-based fluid simulation for interactive applications. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation SCA 2003, 154--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. OSHER, S., AND SETHIAN, J., 1988. Fronts Propagating with Curvature Dependant Speed: Alogorithms Based on Hamilton-Jacobi Formulations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. POPOVIĆ, J., SEITZ, S. M., ERDMANN, M., POPOVIĆ, Z., AND WITKIN, A. 2000. Interactive Manipulation of Rigid Body Simulations. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2000), ACM, 209--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. POPOVIĆ, J. 2001. Interactive Design of Rigid-Body Simulatons for Computer Animation. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. PREMOZE, S., TASDIZEN, T., BIGLER, J., LEFOHN, A., AND WHITAKER, R. 2003. Particle Based Simlation of Fluids. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics) 22, 3, 401--410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. STAM, J. 1999. Stable Fluids. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 99), ACM, 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. TREUILLE, A., MCNAMARA, A., POPOVIĆ, Z., AND STAM, J. 2003. Keyframe control of smoke simulations. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 3 (July), 716--723. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. ZHU, C., BYRD, R., LU, P., AND NOCEDAL, J., 1994. Lbfgs-b: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound constrained optimization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fluid control using the adjoint method

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
      ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 23, Issue 3
      August 2004
      684 pages
      ISSN:0730-0301
      EISSN:1557-7368
      DOI:10.1145/1015706
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 August 2004
      Published in tog Volume 23, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader