skip to main content
article

Countersniper system for urban warfare

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 November 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

An ad-hoc wireless sensor network-based system is presented that detects and accurately locates shooters even in urban environments. The localization accuracy of the system in open terrain is competitive with that of existing centralized countersniper systems. However, the presented sensor network-based solution surpasses the traditional approach because it can mitigate acoustic multipath effects prevalent in urban areas and it can also resolve multiple simultaneous shots. These unique characteristics of the system are made possible by employing novel sensor fusion techniques that utilize the spatial and temporal diversity of multiple detections. In this article, in addition to the overall system architecture, the middleware services and the unique sensor fusion algorithms are described. An analysis of the experimental data gathered during field trials at US military facilities is also presented.

References

  1. Balogh, G., Lédeczi, A., Maróti, M., and Simon, G. 2005. Time of arrival data fusion for source localization. In Proceedings of The WICON Workshop on Information Fusion and Dissemination in Wireless Sensor Networks (SensorFusion 2005), Budapest, Hungary, July.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blickle, T. and Thiele, L. 1995. A comparison of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms. Tech. Rep. TIK-Report 11, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zürich, Switzerland, May.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, J. C., Hudson, R. E., and Yao, K. 2002. Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field. IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc. 50, 1843--1854. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, J., Yip, L., Elson, J., Wang, H., Maniezzo, D., Hudson, R., Yao, K., and Estrin, D. 2003. Coherent acoustic array processing and localization on wireless sensor networks. Proc. IEEE. 91, 1154--1162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Duckworth, G. L., Gilbert, D. C., and Barger, J. E. 1996. Acoustic counter-sniper system. In Proceedings of SPIE International Symposium on Enabling Technologies for Law Enforcement and Security.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Elson, J., Girod, L., and Estrin, D. 2002. Fine-grained network time synchronization using reference broadcasts. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 36, SI, 147--163. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ganeriwal, S., Kumar, R., and Srivastava, M. B. 2003. Timing-sync protocol for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys, 2003) (Los Angeles, CA), 138--149. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hill, J. and Culler, D. 2002. Mica: A wireless platform for deeply embedded networks. IEEE Micro. 22, 12--24. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, Y., Benesty, J., and Elko, G. W. 2000. Passive acoustic source localization for video camera steering. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSP 2000. Turkey, June. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 909--912. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kusy, B., Dutta, P., Lewis, P., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, Á., and Culler, D. 2005. Elapsed time on arrival: A simple and versatile primitive for canonical time synchronization services. Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiq. Comput. In press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lédeczi, A., Völgyesi, P., Maróti, M., Simon, G., Balogh, G., Nadas, A., Kusy, B., and Dora, S. 2005. Multiple simultaneous acoustic source localization in urban terrain. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2005) (Los Angeles, CA, Apr.). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mahajan, A. and Walworth, M. 2001. 3-D position sensing using the differences in the time-of-flights from a wave source to various receivers. IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 17, 91--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Maróti, M. 2004. The directed flood routing framework. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware (Toronto, Ont., Canada, Oct.). ACM, New York, 99--114. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Maróti, M., Kusy, B., Balogh, G., Völgyesi, P., Nadas, A., Molnar, K., Dora, S., and Lédeczi, A. 2005. Radio interferometric geolocation. Accepted at ACM Sensys 2005 (San Diego, CA, Nov.). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Maróti, M., Kusy, B., Simon, G., and Lédeczi, A. 2004. The flooding time synchronization protocol. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2004) (Baltimore, MD, Nov.). ACM, New York, 39, 4--9. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Moroz, S. A., Pierson, R. B., Erter, M. C., Burchick Sr., D. A., and Ippolito, T. 1999. Airborne deployment of and recent improvements to the viper counter sniper system. In Proceedings of the IRIS Passive Sensors (Feb.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pilar Systems. http://www.army-technology.com/contractors/survellance/metravib/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sallai, J., Balogh, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, A., and Kusy, B. 2004. Acoustic ranging in resource-constrained sensor networks. In Proceedings of ICWN '04 (Las Vegas, Nv, June).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Simon, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, A., Balogh, G., Kusy, B., Nadas, A., Pap, G., Sallai, J., and Frampton, K. 2004. Sensor network-based countersniper system. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2004) (Baltimore, MD, Nov.). ACM, New York, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Stoughton, R. 1997. Measurement of small caliber ballistic shock waves in air. JASA 102 2, Pt. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Vick, A., Stillion, J., Frelinger, D. R., Kvitky, J. S., Lambeth, B. S., Marouis, J., and Waxman, M. C. 2000. Aerospace operations in urban environments: Exploring new concepts. In RAND MR-1187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. XBOW. http://www.xbow.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Xu, S. and Yang, X. 2002. A review on interval computation---Software and applications. Int. J. Comput. Numer. Anal. Appl. 1, 149--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Countersniper system for urban warfare

            Recommendations

            Reviews

            Chaim M Scheff

            This paper is a compressive and concise disclosure, relating to a real-world, real-time application for a wireless sensor network. Specifically, this is a detailed enabling case study of the design, integration, and testing of acoustic sensors that converge data into a working computational manifold for the mitigation of acoustic multipath effects, which typically overwhelmed prior methods. The problem complexity includes the simultaneous existence of multiple-location shooting snipers with significant acoustic echo, distortion, and interference phenomena in the recursive asymmetric interstitial regions of ordinary urban landscape topologies. The paper includes an insightful introduction to this increasingly typical scenario of twenty-first century combat, and a detailed recital of the prototype system, including a penetrating analysis of the design criteria, and practical decision elections for the hardware platform, the software architecture, the theory and implementation of practical detection schema, and the application-specific necessities of routing integrated time synchronization. There is also a detailed explanation of sensor fusion, particularly muzzle blast fusion, which requires consistency for resolution of time-of-arrival with an associated elucidated search algorithm, and shockwave fusion, which apparently requires multiple orders of potential muzzle blast fusion, like exploration with an associated elucidated trajectory search algorithm, particularly including an embedded range estimation problem. Furthermore, the paper explicitly presents a clear detailed evaluation of actual field trial error sources, and analysis techniques peculiar to the system test study, including muzzle blast fusion results, muzzle blast fusion sensitivity, shockwave fusion results, and shockwave fusion sensitivity. Simply stated, 11 authors have successfully collaborated to share a great breadth and depth of experience, in the development, testing, and honest critique of a viable cutting-edge sensor network. Clearly, this work is the summary of a larger collection of reports and working papers, each of which is probably a further testimony to the professionalism of the authors. Nevertheless, the advances demonstrated in this report represent a brilliant case study of doing lots of things right in the integration of a large multi-parametric interdisciplinary system. However, this mitigation of acoustic multipath effects for a multi-sensor system seems to inadvertently also describe the components and integration of a noninvasive medical system, which may provide diagnostic insight. Or perhaps this paper simply describes the nontrivial scaling up and tuning of cutting edge acoustical imaging systems, which are already being used in medical research. Regardless, we can hope that this and similar systems will contribute to the invalidation of urban warfare as a theater of armed conflict. Online Computing Reviews Service

            Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

            Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader