skip to main content
article

Engagement theory: a universal paradigm?

Published:03 March 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A Computer Science degree is offered by Victoria University both locally in Australia and transnationally in Hong Kong. The degree includes a compulsory final year Project subject. The Project, a team effort, involves the design and implementation of a real-life computer application for an external client. Academics responsible for the degree consider Project and its three components of group context, project-based problems, and outside focus essential to transforming computing students into competent graduates. Do Project students support this view? This paper reports on a comparative study of the students' perceptions of the project experience and the relative importance of its three components. The paper discusses the results of the study with respect to the different locales, Melbourne and Hong Kong, and concludes by considering the implications of the study on the Project model.

Erratum:

This paper is slightly edited from: Miliszewska, I., & Horwood, J. (2004). Engagement Theory: A Framework for Supporting Cultural Differences in Transnational Education, Proceedings of the HERDSA Conference, Miri, Malaysia, July 2004, (electronic proceedings).

This is a revised and extended version of: Miliszewska, I., Horwood J., & McGill, A. (2003). Transnational Education through Engagement: Students Perspective, Proceedings of the Informing Science and IT Education Conference IS2003, Pori, Finland, June 2003, 165-173.

References

  1. Biggs, J.B. Teaching across and within cultures: the issue of international students. In Murray-Harvey, R. & Silins, H.C. (Eds.) Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Advancing International Perspectives, Proceedings of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Conference (Adelaide, 1997), HERDSA, 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bullock, J.F. Internet technologies for enterprise development and learning. ALN Magazine, 2(1). Retrieved December 2001, from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/magazine/vol2_issue1/bullock.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chickering, A.W., & Ehrmann, S.C. Implementing the seven principles: technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Churcher, N., & Cockburn, A. An immersion model for software engineering projects. Proceedings of the Second Australasian Conference on Computer Science Education, (Melbourne, 1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dede, C. Distance learning to distributed learning: making the transition. Learning & Leading with Technology, 23(7). Retrieved December 2001, from http://www.educause.edu/nlii/articles/dede.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolmans, D. The relationship between student-generated learning issues and self-study in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 22(4), 251--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Felder, R., & Brent, R. Navigating the bumpy road to student-centred instruction. College Teaching, 44(2), 43--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fogarty, R. Problem-Based Learning and Other Curriculum Models for the Multiple Intelligences Classroom. ERIC Document No. ED405143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Idrus, R. Collaborative learning through teletutorials. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 179--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. Engagement Theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved July 2002, from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelly, M.E., & Tak, S.H. Borderless education and teaching and learning cultures: the case of Hong Kong. Australian Universities' Review, 41(1), 26--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kember, D. The Learning Experience of Asian Students: A Challenge to Widely-held Beliefs. Plenary Address given at the 12th Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities, (Hong Kong, 1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kember, R., & Gow, L. A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 117--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kingsland, A. Time expenditure, workload, and student satisfaction in problem-based learning. In Wilkerson, L. & Gijselaers, W.H. (Eds.) Bringing Problem-Based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice. (pp.73--81). San Francisco: Jossey-bass Publishers, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Robinson, B. Asian learners, Western models: Some discontinuities and issues for distance learners. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities. Part III, (Hong Kong, 1998), The Open University of Hong Kong, 370--375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Schiller, J., Ostwald, M., & Chen, S. Implementing a problem-based, distance education undergraduate course in construction management. Distance Education, 15(2), 300--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Engagement theory: a universal paradigm?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
          ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 38, Issue 1
          March 2006
          553 pages
          ISSN:0097-8418
          DOI:10.1145/1124706
          Issue’s Table of Contents
          • cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGCSE '06: Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
            March 2006
            612 pages
            ISBN:1595932593
            DOI:10.1145/1121341

          Copyright © 2006 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 March 2006

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader