skip to main content
10.1145/1272582.1272590acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapgvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Exploring large virtual environments with an HMD when physical space is limited

Published:25 July 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual Environments presented through head-mounted displays (HMDs) are often explored on foot. Exploration on foot is useful since the afferent and efferent cues of physical locomotion aid spatial awareness. However, the size of the virtual environment that can be explored on foot is limited to the dimensions of the tracking space of the HMD unless other strategies are used. This paper presents a system for exploring a large virtual environment on foot when the size of the physical surroundings is small by leveraging people's natural ability to spatially update. This paper presents three methods of "resetting" users when they reach the physical limits of the HMD tracking system. Resetting involves manipulating the users' location in physical space to move them out of the path of the physical obstruction while maintaining their spatial awareness of the virtual space.

References

  1. Allen, R. C., and Singer, M. J. 1997. Landmark direction and distance estimation in large scale. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 1213--1217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowman, D. A., Davis, E. T., Hodges, L. F., and Badre, A. N. 1999. Maintaining spatial orientation during travel in an immersive virtual environment. Presence 8, 6, 618--631. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., and Loomis, J. M. 1998. Locomotion mode affects updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence 7, 2, 168--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Darken, R., and Sibert, J. 1996. Navigating in large virtual worlds. The Int. J. of Human-Computer Interaction 8, 1, 49--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kearns, M., Warren, W., Duchon, A., and Tarr, M. 2002. Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception 31, 349--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., and Golledge, R. G. 1998. Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science 9, 4 (July), 293--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kuhl, S. A. 2004. Recalibration of rotational locomotion in immersive virtual environments. In APGV 2004, 23--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lathrop, W. B., and Kaiser, M. K. 2002. Perceived orientation in physical and virtual environments: Changes in perceived orientation as a function of idiothetic information available. Presence 11, 1, 19--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nitzsche, N., Hanebeck, U., and Schmidt, G. 2004. Motion compression for telepresent walking in large target environments. Presence 13, 1, 44--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Péruch, P., Belingard, L., and Thinus-Blanc, C. 2000. Transfer of spatial knowledge from virtual to real environments. In Spatial Cognition II, C. Freska, Ed. Springer, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Philbeck, J. W., Klatzky, R. K., Behrmann, M., Loomis, J. M., and Goodridge, J. 2001. Active control of locomotion facilitates nonvisual navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27, 141--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Pick, H. L., Rieser, J. J., Wagner, D., and Garing, A. E. 1999. The recalibration of rotational locomotion. J. Exp. Psych: Hum. Perc. Perf. 25, 5, 1179--1188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Presson, C. C., and Montello, D. R. 1994. Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception 23, 1447--1455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Razzaque, S., Kohn, Z., and Whitton, M. C. 2001. Redirected walking. Eurographics Short Presentation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Ashmead, D. A., and Garing, A. E. 1995. The calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. J. Exp. Psych: Hum. Perc. Perf. 21, 480--497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Rieser, J. J. 1989. Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 15, 6, 1157--1165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ruddle, R. A., and Lessels, S. 2006. For efficient navigation search, humans require full physical movement but not a rich visual scene. Psych. Science. To appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., and Jones, D. M. 1999. Navigating large-scale virtual environments: What differences occur between helmet-mounted and desk-top displays? Presence 8, 2, 157--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ruddle, R. A. 2001. Navigation: Am i really lost or virtually there? Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics 6, 135--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Slater, M., Usoh, M., and Steed, A. 1995. Taking steps: The influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Trans. on Human Interaction 2, 3, 201--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Templeman, J. N., Denbrook, P. S., and Sibert, L. E. 1999. Virtual locomotion: Walking in place through virtual environments. Presence 8, 6, 598--617. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Usoh, M., Arthur, K., Whitton, M. C., Bastos, R., Steed, A., Slater, M., and Brooks, F. P. 1999. Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments. In SIGGRAPH 99, 359--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Waller, D., Hunt, E., and Knapp, D. 1998. The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence 7, 2, 129--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Williams, B., Narasimham, G., McNamara, T. P., Carr, T. H., Rieser, J. J., and Bodenheimer, B. 2006. Updating orientation in large virtual environments using scaled translational gain. APGV. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring large virtual environments with an HMD when physical space is limited

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      APGV '07: Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization
      July 2007
      152 pages
      ISBN:9781595936707
      DOI:10.1145/1272582

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 July 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate19of33submissions,58%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader