skip to main content
article

Evaluating XML retrieval effectiveness at INEX

Published:01 June 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The INitiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) was set up in 2002 to establish an infrastructure and provide means, in the form of large test collections and appropriate scoring methods, for evaluating the effectiveness of content-oriented XML retrieval systems. This report provides an overview of the evaluation methodology developed in INEX from 2002 to 2006.

References

  1. C. L. Clarke. Range results in XML retrieval. In INEX 2005 Workshop on Element Retrieval Methodology, pages 4--5, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Denoyer and P. Gallinari. The Wikipedia XML Corpus. SIGIR Forum, 40(1), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Fuhr, N. Gövert, G. Kazai, and M. Lalmas, editors. INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX). Proceedings of the First INEX Workshop (INEX 2002), ERCIM Workshop Proceedings, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Fuhr, M. Lalmas, and S. Malik, editors. INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX). Proceedings of the Second INEX Workshop (INEX 2003), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Fuhr, M. Lalmas, S. Malik, and G. Kazai, editors. Advances in XML Information Retrieval and Evaluation: Fourth Workshop of the INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX 2005). Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Fuhr, M. Lalmas, S. Malik, and Z. Szlávik, editors. Advances in XML Information Retrieval, Third International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX 2004). Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. Fuhr, M. Lalmas, and A. Trotman, editors. Comparative Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval Systems, 5th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX 2006), Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. Goevert, N. Fuhr, M. Lalmas, and G. Kazai. Evaluating the effectiveness of content-oriented XML retrieval methods. Journal of Information Retrieval, 9(6):699--722, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Hawking, E. M. Voorhees, N. Craswell, and P. Bailey. Overview of the TREC-8 Web Track. In TREC, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. Järvelin and J. Kekäläinen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM TOIS, 20(4):422--446, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Kamps, M. Marx, M. de Rijke, and B. Sigurbjörnsson. Structured queries in XML retrieval. In CIKM, pages 2--11, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Kazai. Choosing an Ideal Recall-Base for the Evaluation of the Focused Task: Sensitivity Analysis of the XCG Evaluation Measures. In Fuhr et al. {7}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Kazai and M. Lalmas. Notes on What to Measure in INEX. In INEX 2005 Workshop on Element Retrieval Methodology, Glasgow, July 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. Kazai and M. Lalmas. eXtended Cumulated Gain Measures for the evaluation of content-oriented XML retrieval. ACM TOIS, 24(4), pages 503--542, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. Kazai and M. Lalmas. INEX 2005 Evaluation Metrics. In Fuhr et al. {5}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G. Kazai, M. Lalmas, and A. P. de Vries. The overlap problem in content-orientedXML retrieval evaluation. In SIGIR, pages 72--79, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. Kazai, S. Masood, and M. Lalmas. A study of the assessment of relevance for the INEX'02 test collection. In ECIR, pages 296--310, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. Kekäläinen and K. Järvelin. Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation. JASIST, 53(13), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Lalmas, G. Kazai, J. Kamps, J. Pehcevski, B. Piwowarski, and S. Robertson. INEX 2006 Evaluation Measures. In Fuhr et al. {7}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Lalmas and A. Tombros. INEX 2002 - 2006: Understanding XML Retrieval Evaluation. In DELOS Conference on Digital Libraries, Tirrenia, Pisa, Italy, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. P. Ogilvie and M. Lalmas. Investigating the exhaustivity dimension in content-oriented XML element retrieval evaluation. In CIKM, pages 84--93, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Pehcevski and J. A. Thom. Hixeval: Highlighting xml retrieval evaluation. In Advances in XML Information Retrieval and Evaluation: Fourth Workshop of the INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX 2005), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. B. Piwowarski and G. Dupret. Evaluation in (XML) information retrieval: expected precision-recall with user modelling (eprum). In SIGIR, pages 260--267, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Piwowarski and M. Lalmas. Providing consistent and exhaustive relevance assessments for XML retrieval evaluation. In CIKM, pages 361--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. V. V. Raghavan, P. Bollmann, and G. S. Jung. A critical investigation of recall and precision as measures of retrieval system performance. ACM TOIS, 7(3):205--229, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Tombros, S. Malik, and B. Larsen. Report on the INEX 2004 interactive track. ACM SIGIR Forum, 39(1):43--49, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. A. Trotman and S. Geva. Passage Retrieval and Other XML-Retrieval Tasks. In SIGIR 2006 Workshop on XML Element Retrieval Methodology, pages 43--50, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. A. Trotman and M. Lalmas. Strict and vague interpretation of XML-retrieval queries. In SIGIR, pages 709--710, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. Trotman and M. Lalmas. Why structural hints in queries do not help XML retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 711--712, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. A. Trotman and B. Sigurbjornsson. Narrowed extended XPATHI (NEXI). In INEX 2004 Workshop Proceedings, pages 16--40, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating XML retrieval effectiveness at INEX

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGIR Forum
        ACM SIGIR Forum  Volume 41, Issue 1
        June 2007
        100 pages
        ISSN:0163-5840
        DOI:10.1145/1273221
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2007 Authors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 June 2007

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader