skip to main content
research-article

A multimedia broker to support accessible and mobile learning through learning objects adaptation

Published:18 February 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The large diffusion of e-learning technologies represents a great opportunity for underserved segments of population. This is particularly true for people with disabilities for whom digital barriers should be overstepped with the aim of reengaging them back into society to education. In essence, before a mass of learners can be engaged in a collective educational process, each single member should be put in the position to enjoy accessible and customized educational experiences, regardless of the wide diversity of their personal characteristics and technological equipment. To respond to this demand, we developed LOT (Learning Object Transcoder), a distributed PHP-based service-oriented system designed to deliver flexible and customized educational services for a multitude of learners, each with his/her own diverse preferences and needs. The main novelty of LOT amounts to a broking service able to manage the transcoding activities needed to convert multimedia digital material into the form which better fits a given student profile. Transcoding activities are performed based on the use of Web service technologies. Experimental results gathered from several field trials with LOT (available online at http://137.204.74.83/∼lot/) have confirmed the viability of our approach.

References

  1. Advanced Distributed Learning. 2004. Sharable content object aggregation model (SCORM) content aggregation model (CAM), version 1.3. Available online at http://www. adlnet.org/downloads/files/67.cfm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Berhe, G., Brunje, L., and Pierson, J. 2004. Modeling service-based multimedia content adaptation in pervasing computing. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Computing Frontiers. 60--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chandra, S., Gehani, A., Ellis, C. S., and Vahdat, A. 2001. Transcoding characteristics of Web images. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Multi-Media Computing and Networking (MMCN, January).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Colajanni, M. and Lancellotti, R. 2004. System architectures for Web content adaptation services. IEEE Distrib. Syst. (online) May.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiala, Z., Hinz, M., Meisner, K., and Wehner, F. 2003. A Component based approach for adaptive dynamic Web documents. J. Web Eng., 2, 1&2, 58--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. FFMPEG. 2006. FFmpeg multimedia systems. Available online at http://ffmpeg. sourceforge.net/index.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Han, R., Bhagwat, P., Lamaire, R., Mummert, T., Perret, V., and Rubas, J. 1998. Dynamic adaptation in an image transcoding proxy for mobile WWW browsing. IEEE Person. Commun. 5, 6, 8--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hintz, M. and Fiala, Z. 2004. AMACONT: A system architecture for adaptive multimedia Web applications. Workshop on XML Technologies for the Semantic Web (XSW'04). 65--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ImageMagick. 2006. ImageMagick---convert, edit, and compose images. Available online at http://www.imagemagick.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. IMS Global Learning Consortium. 2006. Available online at http://www.imsglobal.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. IMS Global Learning Consortium. 2002a. IMS AccessForAll meta-data specification. Available online at http://www.imsglobal.org/specificationdownload.cfm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. IMS Global Learning Consortium. 2002b. IMS learner information package accessibility for LIP. Available online at http://www.imsglobal.org/specificationdownload.cfm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. IMS Global Learning Consortium. 2002c. IMS learner information profile (LIP). Available online at http://www.imsglobal.org/specificationdownload.cfm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Italian Parliament. 2004. Law nr. 4 -- 01/09/2004. Official Journal 13, dated January 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelly, B. and Phipps, L. 2006. Holistic approaches to e-learning accessibility. In ALT-J. Res. Learn. Tech. 14, 1, 69--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Korva, J., Plomp, J., Määttä, P., and Metso, M. 2001. On-line service adaptation for mobile and fixed terminal devices. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mobile Data Management. 252--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lei, Z. and Georganas, N. D. 2001. Context based media adaptation in pervasive computing. In Proceedings of the IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer (CCECE'01, May).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lemlouma, T. and Layaida, N. 2003. SMIL content adaptation for embedded devices. In Proceedings of the Synchronised Multimedia Integration Language European Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lum, W. Y. and Lau, F. C. M. 2002. A context-aware decision engine for content adaptation. In IEEE Pervas. Comput. 1, 3, 41--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Metso, M., Loytynoja, M., Korva, J., Maatta, P., and Sauvola, J. 2001. Mobile multimedia services---content adaptation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mirri, S., Pantieri, D., Roccetti, M., and Salomoni, P. 2006. A multimedia broker for accessible learning objects transcoding. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications (ICTTA, Damascus, Syria, April).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mohan, R., Smith, J., and Li, C. S. 1999. Adapting multimedia internet content for universal access. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 1, 1, 104--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Nevile, L., Rothberg, M., Cooper, M., Heath, A., and Treviranus, J. 2005. Learner-centered accessibility for interoperable web-based educational systems. In Proceedings of Interoperability of Web-Based Educational Systems Workshop, 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2005, Chiba, Japan, May).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nusphere and Dietrich A. 2002. Project: NuSOAP---SOAP Toolkit for PHP: Summary. Available online at http://sourceforge.net/projects/nusoap/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Open Mobile Alliance Profile Data (OMA). 2003. User agent profile (UAProf). Available online at http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/profiles/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Parasoft. 2006. SOAtest. Available online at http://www.parasoft.com/jsp/products/home.jsp?product=SOAP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Phan, T., Zorpas, G., and Bagrodia, R. 2002. An extensible and scalable content adaptation pipeline architecture to support heterogeneous clients. In Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS'02). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Salomoni, P. and Mirri, S. 2005. Providing accessible and portable video lecture from content transcoding. In Proceedings of the 11th Euromedia Conference (Toulouse, France, February). 97--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Salomoni, P., Mirri, S., and Pantieri, D. 2006. RMob: Transcoding rich multimedia contents through Web services. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Networking Issues in Multimedia Entertainment---NIME 2006 (CCNC 2006 Satellite Workshop) (Las Vegas, NV, January).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sloman, M. 2002. The E-Learning Revolution: How Technology is Driving a New Training Paradigm. American Management Association, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Stergarsek, E. 2004. Accessible e-learning platform. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE-EESTEC Technical Conference (Arcavatara di Rende (CS), Italy, September).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, J. R., Mohan, R., and Li, C. 1998. Transcoding Internet content for heterogeneous client devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS, May).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. The Inclusive Learning Exchange (TILE). 2006. Available online at http://www.barrierfree. ca/tile/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. U.S. Rehabilitation Act Amendments. 1998. Section 508. Available online at http://www. webaim.org/standards/508/checklist.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wagner, M. and Kellerer, W. 2004. Web services selection for distributed composition of multimedia content. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Multimedia. 104--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Web-4-All Project. 2006. Available online at http://web4all.atrc.utoronto.ca/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. WebServiceX. 2006. Translation engine. Available online at http://www.webservicex.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. World Wide Web Consortium. 1999. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Available online at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. World Wide Web Consortium. 2003. SOAP, version 1.2, part 1: Messaging framework. Available online at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. World Wide Web Consortium. 2004a. Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP): Structure and vocabularies 1.0. Available online at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-CCPP- struct-vocab-20040115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. World Wide Web Consortium. 2004b. Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and abstract syntax. Available online at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. World Wide Web Consortium. 2004c. Web Services Description Language (WSDL), version 2.0, part 1: Core language. Available online at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. World Wide Web Consortium. 2005. Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language 2.1. Available online at http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20051213/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. World Wide Web Consortium. 2006. Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0, basic guidelines. W3C Working Draft 18 (May). Available online at http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Wurfl. 2006. Wireless Universal Resource File Library. Available online at http://wurfl. sourceforge.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Yoshikawa, C., Chun, B., Eastam, P., Vahdat, A., Anderson, T., and Culler, D. 1997. Using smart clients to build scalable services. In Proceedings of Winter 1997 USENIX Technical Conference (January). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A multimedia broker to support accessible and mobile learning through learning objects adaptation

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      Jean-Noel Colin

      All e-learners should have accessible and customized educational experiences, regardless of their wide diversity and the equipment they use. To this end, the paper presents a model, together with its implementation, to generate on-the-fly digital content that has been adapted?that is, recoded?based on some characteristics of the end user. The approach is rather simple: based on a set of profile criteria, digital content is recoded according to the user's abilities and equipment. For performance reasons, it uses a broker architecture that orchestrates Web services to perform all recoding operations in parallel. I would be curious to see how the proposed model expands to more sophisticated user profiling that goes beyond the simple elements described in the paper. For instance, the iClass research project (http://www.iclass.info) goes far beyond, in terms of user profiling and providing personalized content. The system could also benefit from using a service directory from which to pick the services to be run to recode data. Some performance figures are provided, but they do not cover the full project; it would be good to have an overall performance assessment with many different users, with different profiles accessing different content. Overall, this is a nice paper that offers interesting areas for further research. It is written in a clear style and it's easy to read. Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
        ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  Volume 8, Issue 2
        February 2008
        93 pages
        ISSN:1533-5399
        EISSN:1557-6051
        DOI:10.1145/1323651
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 February 2008
        • Accepted: 1 April 2007
        • Revised: 1 February 2007
        • Received: 1 June 2006
        Published in toit Volume 8, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader