skip to main content
10.1145/1349822.1349827acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do

Published:12 March 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a study of people's attitudes toward robot workers, identifying the characteristics of occupations for which people believe robots are qualified and desired. We deployed a web-based public-opinion survey that asked respondents (n=250) about their attitudes regarding robots' suitability for a variety of jobs (n=812) from the U.S. Department of Labor's O*NET occupational information database. We found that public opinion favors robots for jobs that require memorization, keen perceptual abilities, and service-orientation. People are preferred for occupations that require artistry, evaluation, judgment and diplomacy. In addition, we found that people will feel more positively toward robots doing jobs with people rather than in place of people.

References

  1. Billard, A., Dautenhahn, K. and Hayes, G. Experiments on human-robot communication with Robota. in Edmonds, B. and Dautenhahn, K. (eds.), Socially Situated Intelligence. University of Zürich Technical Report, 1988, 4--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, G.F. Experiments with the middle response alternative in survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly 51 (1987), 220--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bolter, J.D. Turing's Man, UNC Press, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Breazeal, C. and Scassellati, B. Robot in society: Friend or appliance' Proceedings of Agents, (1999), 18--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Capek, J. Rossum's Universal Robots, Prague, CZ, 1920.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cochran, W. G. Some effects of errors of measurement on multiple correlation. Journal of American Statistical Association 65, 329 (1970), 22--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cowan, R. W. More work for mother. Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dautenhahn, K., Woods, R. Kaouir, C, Walters, M., Koay K. L., and Werry, I. What is a Robot Companion Friend, Assistant or Butler' IROS '2005 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman, B., Kahn Jr, P.H. and Hagman, J. Hardware companions': What online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. Proceedings of CHI (2003), 273--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L., and Jones, H. Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. HCI 19 (2004), 151--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Howell, D C. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 2002, 548.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mechanical Turk. http://www.mturk.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Matthews, J.T., Engberg, S.J., Glover, J., Pollack, M. and Thrun, S. Robotic Assistants for the Elderly: Designing and Conducting Field Studies. Proceedings of ICRA, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mutlu, B., Oman, S., Forlizzi, J., Hodgins, J. and Kiesler, S. Perceptions of ASIMO: An exploration on cooperation and competition with humans and humanoid robots. Proceedings of HRI, (2006), 351--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nass, C., Lombard, M., Henriksen, L. and Steuer, J. Anthropocentrism and computers. Behaviour and Information Technology 14, 4 (1995), 229--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Nass, C. and Mason, L. On the study of technology and task: A variable-based approach. in Fulk, J. and Steinfeld, C. eds. Organization and Communication Technology, Sage, Newbury Park, 1990, 46--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nomura, T., Kanda, T. and Suzuki, T. Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human-robot interaction. AI & Society 20, 2 (2006), 138--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, J., Han, N., Shin, J., Burke, J., and Kato, K. Implications on humanoid robots in pedagogical applications from cross-cultural analysis between Japan, Korea, and the USA. Proceedings of RO-MAN, (2007), 1052--1057.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Norman, D.A. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. O*NET online. http://online.onetcenter.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sheridan, T.B., Vamos, T. and Aida, S. Adapting automation to man, culture and society. Automatica 19, 6 (1983), 605--612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Shibata, T., Mitsui, T., Wada, K. and Tanie, K. Subjective Evaluation of Seal Robot: Paro-Tabulation and Analysis of Questionnaire Results. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 14 (1) (2002), 13--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Steinfeld, A.M., Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A. and Goodrich, M. Common metrics for human-robot interaction. Proceedings of HRI, (2006), 33--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, USA, 2001, 146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Thrun, S. Toward a Framework of Human-Robot Interaction. HCI 19 (2004), 9--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. US Dept of Labor. Dictionary of Occupational Titles, Gov't Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Weil, M. M. and Rosen, L. D. The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: A study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Computers in Human Behavior 11, 1 (1995), 95--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
      March 2008
      402 pages
      ISBN:9781605580173
      DOI:10.1145/1349822

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 March 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader