skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357291acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The effects of empathetic virtual characters on presence in narrative-centered learning environments

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent years have seen a growing interest in the role that narrative can play in learning. With the emergence of narrative-centered learning environments that engage students by drawing them into rich interactions with compelling characters, we have begun to see the significant potential offered by immersive story-based learning experiences. In this paper we describe two studies that investigate the impact of empathetic characters on student perceptions of presence. A study was initially conducted with middle school students, and was then replicated with high school students. The results indicate that, for both populations, employing empathetic characters in narrative-centered learning environments significantly increases student perceptions of presence. The studies also reveal that empathetic characters contribute to a heightened sense of student involvement and control in learning situations.

References

  1. Bailenson, J., Swinth, K., Hoyt, C., Persky, S., Dimov, A., & Blascovich, J. The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14, 4 (2005), 379--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bates, J. Virtual reality, art, and entertainment. Presence: The Journal of Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1, 1 (1992), 133--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bickmore, T., and Picard, R. Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, 12, 2 (2004), 293--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brave, S., Nass, C., and Hutchinson, K. Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, (2005), 161--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Craig, S., Graesser, A., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Educational Media, 29, (2004), 241--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row Publishers Inc., New York, NY, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, M. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Brown and Benchmark Publishers, Madison, WI, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dow, S., Mehta, M., Harmon, E., MacIntyre, B., and Mateas, M. Presence and Engagement in an Interactive Drama. Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 1475--1484 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Elliot, A., and McGregor, H. A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 3 (2001), 501--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Egri, L. The Art of Dramatic Writing: Its Basis in the Creative Interpretation of Human Motives. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY, 1946.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Garau, M., Slater, M., Pertaub, D., and Razzaque, S.The responses of people to virtual humans in an immersive virtual environment, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14, 1 (2005), 104--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gerrig, R. Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Green, M., and Brock, T. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, (2000), 701--721.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hoffman, M. Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ickes, W. Empathic Accuracy. Guilford Press, New York, NY, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. IJsselsteijn, W., de Ridder, H., Freeman, J. and Avons, S. Presence: Concept, determinants and measurement. In Proc of the SPIE 2000, 520--529.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Insko, B. Measuring presence: Subjective, behavioral and physiological methods. In G. Riva, F. Davide, and W. IJsselsteijn (Eds.), Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurements of User Presence in Synthetic Environments. Amsterdam: Ios Press (2003), 109--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, Y., and Baylor, A. A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54, 6 (2006), 569--590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnsen, K., Raij, A., Stevens, A., Lind, S., Lok, B. The validity of a virtual human experience for interpersonal skills education. Proc of CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 1049--1058. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kelso, M., Weyhrauch, P., and Bates, J. Dramatic presence. Presence: The Journal of Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2,1 (1993), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., and Mainemelis, C. Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg and L. F. Zhang (Eds), Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles. Mahwah, NJ: Prentice Hall (2000), 227--247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, K., and Nass, C. Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction. Proc of CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 289--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lombard, M., and Ditton, T. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 3, 2 (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Malone, T., and Lepper, M. Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Snow, R., and Farr, M. (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: III. Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223--253). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. McQuiggan, S., and Lester, J. Learning empathy: A data-driven framework for modeling empathetic companion agents. Proc. of AAMAS 2006, 961--968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. McQuiggan, S., and Lester, J. Modeling and evaluating empathy in embodied companion agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 4, (2007), 348--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. McQuiggan, S., Robison, J., Phillips, R., and Lester, J. Modeling parallel and reactive empathy in virtual agents: An inductive approach. Proc. of AAMAS 2008, to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Meehan, M., Insko, B., Whitton, M. and Brooks, F. Physiological measures of presence in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21, (2002), 645--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Norman, D. The Invisible Computer. MIT Press, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Aylett, R., Sobreperez, P., Woods, S., Zoll, C., Hall, L. Caring for Agents and Agents that Care: Building Empathic Relations with Synthetic Agents. Proc of AAMAS 2004, 194--201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Parker, L. and Lepper, M. Effects of fantasy contexts on children's learning and motivation: Making learning more fun. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 4 (1992), 625 -- 633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Prendinger, H., and Ishizuka, M., The empathic companion: a character-based interface that addresses users' affective states. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19, (2005), 267--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Rickel, J., and Johnson, L. Integrating pedagogical capabilities in a virtual environment agent. Proc. of Intl Conf on Autonomous Agents, (1997), 30--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Rowe, J., McQuiggan, S., and Lester, J. Narrative presence in intelligent learning environments. In 2007 AAAI Symposium on Intelligent Narrative Technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryokai, K., Vaucelle, C., Cassell, J. Virtual Peers as Partners in Storytelling and Literacy Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 2 (2003), 195--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., and Regenbrecht, H. Embodied presence in virtual environments. In Paton, R., and Neilson, I. (Eds.), Visual Representations and Interpretations. London: Springer (1999). 269--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Swartout, W., Gratch, J., Hill, R., Hovy, E., Marsella, S., Rickel, J., & Traum, D. Toward Virtual Humans. AI Magazine, 27, 2 ( 2006), 96--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Vinayagamoorthy, V., Steed, A. and Slater, M. Building Characters: Lessons Drawn from Virtual Environments. Proc of Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science at CogSci 2005, (2005), 119--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Waterworth, E.L., and Waterworth, J. A. Presence and Absence in Educational VR: The Role of Perceptual Seduction in Conceptual Learning. Themes in Education, 1, 1, (2000), 7--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Wells, C. The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Heinnemann, Portsmouth, NH, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiendl, C., Dorfmüller-Ulhaas, K., Schulz, N., and André, E. Integrating a Virtual Agent into the Real World: the Virtual Anatomy Assistant Ritchie. Proc. of IVA 2007, 211--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Witmer, B., and Singer, M. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 3 (1998), 225--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Zanbaka, C., Ulinski, A., Goolkasian, P., Hodges, L. F. Social responses to virtual humans: Implications for future interface design." Proc of CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 1561 -- 1570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The effects of empathetic virtual characters on presence in narrative-centered learning environments

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2008
          1870 pages
          ISBN:9781605580111
          DOI:10.1145/1357054

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 April 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader