skip to main content
10.1145/1389095.1389114acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Runtime analysis of binary PSO

Published:12 July 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We investigate the runtime of the Binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm introduced by Kennedy and Eberhart (1997). The Binary PSO maintains a global best solution and a swarm of particles. Each particle consists of a current position, an own best position and a velocity vector used in a probabilistic process to update the particle's position. We present lower bounds for swarms of polynomial size. To prove upper bounds, we transfer a fitness-level argument well-established for evolutionary algorithms (EAs) to PSO. This method is applied to estimate the expected runtime on the class of unimodal functions. A simple variant of the Binary PSO is considered in more detail. The 1-PSO only maintains one particle, hence own best and global best solutions coincide. Despite its simplicity, the 1-PSO is surprisingly efficient. A detailed analysis for the function OneMax shows that the 1-PSO is competitive to EAs.

References

  1. D. Bratton and J. Kennedy. Defining a standard for particle swarm optimization. In Proc. of Swarm Intelligence Symposium (SIS 2007), pages 120--127. IEEE Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Clerc. Particle Swarm Optimization. ISTE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. B. Doerr, F. Neumann, D. Sudholt, and C. Witt. On the runtime analysis of the 1-ANT ACO algorithm. In Proc. of GECCO '07, pages 33--40. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Droste, T. Jansen, and I. Wegener. On the analysis of the (1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 1) evolutionary algorithm. Theor. Comput. Sci., 276:51--81, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. O. Giel and I. Wegener. Evolutionary algorithms and the maximum matching problem. In Proc. of STACS '03, volume 2607 of LNCS, pages 415--426, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. J. Gutjahr. First steps to the runtime complexity analysis of Ant Colony Optimization. Computers and Operations Research, 2008. To appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. Hoeffding. Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. American Statistical Association Journal, 58(301):13--30, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pages 1942--1948. IEEE Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart. A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In Proc. of the World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI), pages 4104--4109, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Kennedy, R. C. Eberhart, and Y. Shi. Swarm intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. F. Neumann, D. Sudholt, and C. Witt. Comparing variants of MMAS ACO algorithms on pseudo-boolean functions. In Proc. of SLS 2007, volume 4638 of LNCS, pages 61--75, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. Neumann and I. Wegener. Randomized local search, evolutionary algorithms, and the minimum spanning tree problem. Theor. Comput. Sci., 378(1):32--40, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Neumann and C. Witt. Runtime analysis of a simple Ant Colony Optimization algorithm. In Proc. of ISAAC '06, volume 4288 of LNCS, pages 618--627. Springer, 2006. Extended version to appear in Algorithmica. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Reichel and M. Skutella. Evolutionary algorithms and matroid optimization problems. In GECCO '07, pages 947--954, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart. Parameter selection in particle swarm optimization. In Proc. of the Seventh Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, pages 591--600, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. I. Wegener. Methods for the analysis of evolutionary algorithms on pseudo-boolean functions. In R. Sarker, X. Yao, and M. Mohammadian, editors, Evolutionary Optimization, pages 349--369. Kluwer, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Witt. Worst-case and average-case approximations by simple randomized search heuristics. In Proc. of STACS '05, volume 3404 of LNCS, pages 44--56, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Runtime analysis of binary PSO

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '08: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      July 2008
      1814 pages
      ISBN:9781605581309
      DOI:10.1145/1389095
      • Conference Chair:
      • Conor Ryan,
      • Editor:
      • Maarten Keijzer

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 July 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader