skip to main content
10.1145/1403375.1403380acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdateConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cycle-approximate retargetable performance estimation at the transaction level

Published:10 March 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a novel cycle-approximate performance estimation technique for automatically generated transaction level models (TLMs) for heterogeneous multi-core designs. The inputs are application C processes and their mapping to processing units in the platform. The processing unit model consists of pipelined datapath, memory hierarchy and branch delay model. Using the processing unit model, the basic blocks in the C processes are analyzed and annotated with estimated delays. This is followed by a code generation phase where delay-annotated C code is generated and linked with a SystemC wrapper consisting of inter-process communication channels. The generated TLM is compiled and executed natively on the host machine. Our key contribution is that the estimation technique is close to cycle-accurate, it can be applied to any multi-core platform and it produces high-speed native compiled TLMs. For experiments, timed TLMs for industrial scale designs such as MP3 decoder were automatically generated for 4 heterogeneous multi-processor platforms with up to 5 PEs under 1 minute. Each TLM simulated under 1 second, compared to 3--4 hrs of instruction set simulation (ISS) and 15--18 hrs of RTL simulation. Comparison to on-board measurement showed only 8% error on average in estimated number of cycles.

References

  1. T. Austin, E. Larson, and D. Ernst. Simplescalar: an infrastructure for computer system modeling. Computer, 35(2):59--67, February 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. R. Bammi, W. Kruijtzer, and L. Lavagno. Software Performance Estimatioin Strategies in a System-Level Design Tool. In CODES, San Diego, USA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. Brandolese, W. Fornaciari, F. Salice, and D. Sciuto. Source-Level Execution Time Estimation of C Programs. In CODES, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Cai, A. Gerstlauer, and D. Gajski. Retargetable Profiling for Rapid, Early System-Level Design Space Exploration. In DATE, San Diego, USA, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M.-K. Chung, S. Na, and C.-M. Kyung. System-Level Performance Analysis of Embedded System using Behavioral C/C++ model. In VLSI-TSA-DAT, Hsinchu, Taiwan, April 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ESE: Embedded Systems Environment. "http://www.cecs.uci.edu/ese".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. FastVeri (SystemC-based High-Speed Simulator) Product. "http://www.interdesigntech.co.jp/english/fastveri/".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Kempf, K. Karuri, S. Wallentowitz, G. Ascheid, R. Leupers, and H. Meyr. A SW Performance Estimation Framework for Early System-Level-Design using Fine-grained Instrumentation. In DATE, Munich, Germany, March 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Lajolo, M. Lazarescu, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. A Compilation-based Software Estimation Scheme for Hardware/Software Co-simulation. In CODES, Rome, Italy, May 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J.-Y. Lee and I.-C. Park. Time Compiled-code Simulation of Embedded Software for Performance Analysis of SOC design. In DAC, New Orleans, USA, June 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. LLVM(Low Level Virtual Machine) Compiler Infrastructure Project. "http://www.llvm.org".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. T. Russell and M. F. Jacome. Architecture-level Performance Evaluation of Component-based Embedded Systems. In DAC, Anaheim, USA, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. VaST: Virtual System Prototype Technologies. "http://www.vastsystems.com/solutions-architecture-systems.html".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Xilinx. Embedded System Tools Reference Manual. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Xilinx. MicroBlaze Processor Reference Manual. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. Yu, S. Abdi, and D. Gajski. Transaction level platform modeling in systemc for multi-processor designs. Technical Report CECS-TR-07-01, January 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cycle-approximate retargetable performance estimation at the transaction level

                    Recommendations

                    Comments

                    Login options

                    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                    Sign in
                    • Published in

                      cover image ACM Conferences
                      DATE '08: Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe
                      March 2008
                      1575 pages
                      ISBN:9783981080131
                      DOI:10.1145/1403375

                      Copyright © 2008 ACM

                      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                      Publisher

                      Association for Computing Machinery

                      New York, NY, United States

                      Publication History

                      • Published: 10 March 2008

                      Permissions

                      Request permissions about this article.

                      Request Permissions

                      Check for updates

                      Qualifiers

                      • research-article

                      Acceptance Rates

                      Overall Acceptance Rate518of1,794submissions,29%

                    PDF Format

                    View or Download as a PDF file.

                    PDF

                    eReader

                    View online with eReader.

                    eReader