skip to main content
10.1145/1557019.1557067acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TrustWalker: a random walk model for combining trust-based and item-based recommendation

Published:28 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Collaborative filtering is the most popular approach to build recommender systems and has been successfully employed in many applications. However, it cannot make recommendations for so-called cold start users that have rated only a very small number of items. In addition, these methods do not know how confident they are in their recommendations. Trust-based recommendation methods assume the additional knowledge of a trust network among users and can better deal with cold start users, since users only need to be simply connected to the trust network. On the other hand, the sparsity of the user item ratings forces the trust-based approach to consider ratings of indirect neighbors that are only weakly trusted, which may decrease its precision. In order to find a good trade-off, we propose a random walk model combining the trust-based and the collaborative filtering approach for recommendation. The random walk model allows us to define and to measure the confidence of a recommendation. We performed an evaluation on the Epinions dataset and compared our model with existing trust-based and collaborative filtering methods.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p397-jamali.mp4

mp4

124.8 MB

References

  1. R. Andersen, C. Borgs, J. Chayes, U. Feige, A. Flaxman, A. Kalai, V. Mirrokni, and M. Tennenholtz. Trust-based recommendation systems: an axiomatic approach. In WWW 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. M. Bell, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Modeling relationships at multiple scales to improve accuracy of large recommender systems. In KDD 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1), 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Crandall, D. Cosley, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and S. Suri. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In KDD 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Golbeck. Computing and Applying Trust in Web-based Social Networks. PhD thesis, University of Maryland College Park, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. M. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 35(12), 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In KDD 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Levien and Aiken. Advogato's trust metric. online at http://advogato.org/trust-metric.html, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Ma, H. Yang, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Sorec: social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization. In CIKM '08, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Massa and P. Avesani. Trust-aware recommender systems. In ACM Recommender Systems Conference (RecSys), USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Milgram. The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. O'Donovan and B. Smyth. Trust in recommender systems. In 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Rettinger, M. Nickles, and V. Tresp. A statistical relational model for trust learning. In AAMAS '08: 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In KDD 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Yildirim and M. S. Krishnamoorthy. A random walk method for alleviating the sparsity problem in collaborative filtering. In ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), Switzerland, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. N. Ziegler. Towards Decentralized Recommender Systems. PhD thesis, University of Freiburg, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. TrustWalker: a random walk model for combining trust-based and item-based recommendation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '09: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      June 2009
      1426 pages
      ISBN:9781605584959
      DOI:10.1145/1557019

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 June 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader