skip to main content
10.1145/1731740.1731824acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Scoring concept maps: an overview

Published:18 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper presents summarization of proposed scoring schemes of concept maps. The main attention is devoted not only to theoretical approaches considering assessment of students' concept maps, but also to scoring mechanisms implemented in the existent concept map based computerized assessment systems. Conclusions about application of examined scoring schemes are made and factors affecting students' score in computerized assessment systems are identified.

References

  1. Cañas, A. J. A Summary of Literature Pertaining to the Use of Concept Mapping Techniques and Technologies for Education and Performance Support. Technical report: Pensacola, FL, 2003, 108 p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang, K. E.,. Y. T. Sung, S. F. Chen. Learning Through Computer-Based Concept Mapping with Scaffolding Aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 17, no. 1, 2001, pp. 21--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chang, K. E., Y. T. Sung, R. B. Chang, S. C. Lin. A New Assessment for Computer-Based Concept Mapping. Educational Technology and Society, vol. 8, no. 3, 2005, pp. 138--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cimolino, L., J. Kay, A. Miller. Incremental Student Modelling and Reflection by Verified Concept-Mapping. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Learner Modelling for Reflection Workshop, July 20--24, 2003, Sydney, Australia, pp. 219--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Conlon, T. Formative Assessment of Classroom Concept Maps: the Reasonable Fallible Analyser. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, vol. 17, no. 1, 2006, pp. 15--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Da Rocha, F. E. L., J. V. Da Costa Junior, E. L. Favero. An Approach to Computer-Aided Learning Assessment. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Concept Mapping, September 22--25, 2008, Tallinn, Estonia and Helsinki, Finland, pp. 170--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldsmith, T. E., P. J. Johnson, W. H. Acton. Assessing Structural Knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 83, no. 1, 1991, pp. 88--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gouli, E., A. Gogoulou, K. Papanikolaou, M. Grigoriadou. Evaluating Learner's Knowledge Level on Concept Mapping Tasks. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, July 5--8, 2005, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, pp. 424--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Grundspenkis, J., A. Anohina. Evolution of the Concept Map Based Adaptive Knowledge Assessment System: Implementation and Evaluation Results. Scientific Proceedings of Riga Technical University, RTU Publishing, Riga, 2009 (in print).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Herl, H. E., H. F. O'Neil, G. K. W. K. Chung, R. A. Dennis, J. J. Lee. Feasibility of an On-line Concept Mapping Construction and Scoring System. Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, March, 1997, Chicago, Il.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoeft, R. M., F. G. Jentsch, M. E. Harper, A. W. Evans, C. A. Bowers, E. Salas. TPL-KATS-Concept Map: a Computerized Knowledge Assessment Tool. Computers in Human Behavior, no. 19, 2003, pp. 653--657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Klein, D. C. D., G. K. W. K. Chung, E. Osmundson, H. E. Herl. Examining the Validity of Knowledge Mapping as a Measure of Elementary Students' Scientific Understanding. CSE Report 557, University of California, Los Angeles, 2002, 45p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu, X. The Validity and Reliability of Concept Mapping as an Alternative Science Assessment when Item Response Theory Is Used for Scoring. Paper presented in Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 4--8, 1994, 32 p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, C. C., P. H. Don, C. M. Tsai. Assessment Based on Linkage Patterns in Concept Maps. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, no. 21, 2005, pp. 873--890.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Markham, K. M., J. J. Mintzes, M. G. Jones. The Concept Map as a Research and Evaluation Tool: Further Evidence of Validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 31, 1994, pp. 91--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. McClure, J. R., B. Sonak, H. K. Suen. Concept Map Assessment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity, and Logistical Practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 36, no. 4, 1999, pp. 475--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mls, K. Implicit Knowledge in Concept Maps and Their Revealing by Spatial Analysis of Hand-drawn Maps. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Concept Mapping, September 5--8, 2006, San José, Costa Rica, 2006, pp. 130--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicoll, G., J. Francisco, M. Nakhleh. A Three-Tier System for Assessing Concept Map Links: a Methodological Study. International Journal of Science Education, vol. 23, no. 8, 2001, pp. 863--875.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Novak, J. D., D. B. Gowin. Learning How to Learn. Cambrige: Cambridge University press, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pearsall, N. R., J. Skipper, J. Mintzes. Knowledge Restructuring in the Life Sciences: a Longitudinal Study of Conceptual Change in Biology. Science Education, vol. 81, no. 2, 1997, pp. 193--215.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pirnay-Dummer, P., D. Ifenthaler, J. M. Spector. Highly Integrated Model Assessment Technology and Tools. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, October 13--15, 2008, Freiburg, Germany, pp. 18--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., S. E. Schultz, R. J. Shavelson. Concept Map-Based Assessment in Science: Two Exploratory Studies. CSE Report 436, University of California, Los Angeles, 1997, 54 p.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Rye, J. A., P. A. Rubba. Scoring Concept Maps: an Expert Map-Based Scheme Weighted for Relationships. School Science and Mathematics, vol. 102, no. 1, 2002, p. 33--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Taricani, E. M., R. B. Clariana. A Technique for Automatically Scoring Open-Ended Concept Maps. Educational Technology, Research and Development, vol. 54, no. 1, 2006, pp. 65--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsai, C. C., S. S. J. Lin, S. M Yuan. Students' Use of Web-based Concept Map Testing and Strategies for Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 17, no. 1, 2001, pp. 72--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Vilkelis, M., A. Anohina, R. Lukashenko. Architecture and Working Principles of the Concept Map Based Knowledge Assessment System. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Virtual Learning, October 31- November 2, 2008, Constanta, Romania, pp. 81--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Wallace, J. D., J. J. Mintzes. The Concept Map as a Research Tool: Exploring Conceptual Change in Biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 27, no. 10, 1990, pp. 1033--1052.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. West, D. C., J. K. Park, J. R. Pomeroy, J. Sandoval. Concept Mapping Assessment in Medical Education: a Comparison of Two Scoring Systems. Medical Education, no. 36, 2002, pp. 820--826.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Yao, Q., K. Yang, G. Zhao, R Huang. A Scoring Algorithm Based on Proposition Chains for Concept Mapping. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Concept Mapping, September 5--8, 2006, San José, Costa Rica, 2006, pp. 8--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Yin, Y., J. Vanides, M. A. Ruiz-Primo, C. C. Ayala, R. Shavelson. A Comparison of Two Construct-a-Concept-Map Science Assessments: Created Linking Phrases and Selected Linking Phrases. CSE Report 624, University of California, Los Angeles, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scoring concept maps: an overview

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            CompSysTech '09: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing
            June 2009
            653 pages
            ISBN:9781605589862
            DOI:10.1145/1731740

            Copyright © 2009 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 June 2009

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader