skip to main content
research-article

The intangibility of e-services: effects on perceived risk and acceptance

Published:12 May 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This study examines the construct of intangibility within the e-services context and clarifies why business-to-consumer services are made more intangible when they are virtualized and offered as Internet e-services. Clarifying the intangibility of e-services and examining its consequents is important as service providers seek to encourage consumers to use lower-cost e-services. This research specifically develops theory to explain how and why an e-service's intangibility can increase consumer beliefs that it is risky to use, and furthermore removes the risk-reducing effect of the e-service's perceived ease of use. These consequents of an e-service's intangibility are important to clarify because e-service's usage is based in part on beliefs that they are safe and easy to use. Results from a structural equation model-based analysis of consumer survey data supported these two hypothesized effects. More specifically, the performance, financial, and privacy risk dimensions were most affected by consumers' experience of mental intangibility regarding the e-service. In addition, a qualification of a previously reported risk-reducing strategy for e-service providers was identified. Only when consumers' mental intangibility was low (i.e., they had a clear mental picture of the e-service) did the e-service's perceived ease of use function as a risk-reducing factor. An e-service's intangibility may indirectly impede consumer usage of a range of e-services. Theoretical and practical implications are offered.

References

  1. Agarwal, R., and Prasad, J. "Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?," Decision Sciences (30:2) 1999, pp 361--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baker, J. (ed.) The role of the environment in marketing services: the consumer perspective. American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateson, J. "Do We Need Services Marketing Marketing services: New insights," Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer, R. (ed.) Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellman, S., Lohse, G., and Johnson, E. "Predictors of Online Buying Behavior," Communications of the ACM (42:12) 1999, pp 32--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bem, D. (ed.) The concept of risk in the study of human behavior. The Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, L. L. "Services Marketing Is Different," Business (30:May-June) 1980, pp 24--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, L. L., and Clark, T. "Four ways to make services more tangible," Business 1986, pp 53--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. Marketing services competing through quality The Free Press, New York, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Berthon, P., Pitt, L., Katsikeas, C., and Berthon, J. "Executive insights: Virtual services go international: International services in the marketspace," Journal of International Marketing (7:3) 1999, pp 84--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bettman, J. "Information integration in consumer risk perception: A comparison of two models of component conceptualization," Journal of Applied Psychology (60:3) 1975, pp 381--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bhatnagar, A., and Ghose, S. "Segmenting consumers based on the benefits and risks of internet shopping," Journal of Buiness Research (57) 2004, pp 1352--1360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Bitner, M. J., Brown, S., and Meuter, M. "Technology infusion in service encounters," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (28:1) 2000, pp 138--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Bollen, K. A. Structural equations with latent variables Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Brannback, M., and Pukakainen, J. "Web marketing: Has the distinction between products and services become obsolete?," Journal of Market Focused Management (3:1) 1998, pp 47--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Breivik, E., Troye, S., and Olsson, U. "Dimensions of intangibility and their impact on product evaluation," Association for Consumer Research, Montreal, Canada, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chidambaram, L. "Why e-service journal?," e-Service Journal (1:1) 2001, pp 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Clow, K. E., Baack, D., and Fogliasso, C. "Reducing perceived risk through advertising service quality cues," Journal of Professional Services Marketing (16:2) 1998, pp 151--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., and Aiken, L. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Coombs, C. H. (ed.) Portfolio theory and the measurement of risk. Academic Press, Inc, New York, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Culnan, M., and Armstrong, P. "Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation," Organization Science (10:1) 1999, pp 104--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Davis, F. D. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly (13:3) 1989, pp 319--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., and Kleijnen, M. "Customer adoption of e-service: An experimental study," International Journal of Service Industry Management (12:2) 2001, pp 184--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Dennis, A. R., and Valacich, J. S. "Conducting research in information systems," Communications of the AIS (7:5) 2001, pp 1--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Doll, W. J., Xia, W., and Torkzadeh, G. "A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument," MIS Quarterly (18:4) 1994, pp 453--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Dowling, G. R., and Staelin, R. "A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling Activity," Journal of Consumer Research (21:June) 1994, pp 119--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Engel, J., Blackwell, R., and Miniard, P. Consumer behavior, (8 ed.) Dryden Press, Fort Worth, TX, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Featherman, M., Miyazaki, A., and Sprott, D. "Reducing Online Privacy Risk to Facilitate e-Service Adoption: The Influence of Perceived Ease of Use and Retailer Credibility," Journal of Services Marketing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Featherman, M., and Pavlou, P. "Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective," International Journal of Human Computer Studies (59:4) 2003, pp 451--474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Featherman, M., Valacich, J. S., and Wells, J. D. "Is that authentic or artificial? Understanding consumer perceptions of risk in e-service encounters," Information Systems Journal (16:2) 2006, pp 107--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Finn "A theory of the consumer evaluation process for new product concepts," in: Research in Consumer Behavior, J. Sheth (ed.), JAI Press, Greenwich, CN, 1985, pp. 35--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Fornell, C., and Larker, D. "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error," Journal of Marketing Research (18:39--50) 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. "Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model," MIS Quarterly (27:1) 2003, pp 51--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Gefen, D., and Straub, D. "The relative importance of perceived ease-of-use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption," Journal of the Association for Information Systems (1:8) 2000, pp 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Gefen, D., and Straub, D. "Consumer trust in b2c e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services," Omega (32:6) 2004, pp 407--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., and Boudreau, M. C. "Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice," Comunications of the Association for Information Systems (4:7) 2000, pp 1--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., and Griskevicius, V. "A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels," Journal of Consumer Research (35:3) 2008, pp 472--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J., and Marmorstein, H. "The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship," Journal of Consumer Research (21:1) 1994, pp 145--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Harman, H. H. Modern Factor Analysis University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Havlena, W., and DeSarbo, W. "On the measurement of perceived consumer risk," Decision Sciences (22:4) 1990, pp 927--939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Hirschman, E. "Attributes of attributes and layers of meaning Advances in Consumer Research," Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, 1980, pp. 7--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoffman, K. "MIS+Marketing=e-service," Communications of the ACM (46:6) 2003, pp 53--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Hsu, M. H., and Chiu, C. M. "Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance," Decision Support Systems (38:3) 2003, pp 369--381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jarvenpaa, S., Tractinsky, N., and Vitale, M. "Consumer trust in an Internet store," IT and Management (1) 2000, pp 45--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Jia, J., Dyer, J., and Butler, J. "Measures of perceived risk," Management Science (45:4) 1999, pp 519--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk," Econometrica (47:2) 1979, pp 263--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Kaplan, L., and Szybille, G. "Components of perceived risk in product purchase - a cross-validation," Journal of Applied Psychology (59:3) 1974, pp 287--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Klein, A., and Moosbrugger, H. "Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method," Psychometrika (65:4) 2000, pp 457--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Koiso-Kanttila, N. "Time, attention, authenticity and consumer benefits of the web," Business Horizons (48:1) 2005, pp 63--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Koller, M. "Risk as a determinant of trust," Basic and Applied Social Psychology (9:4) 1988, pp 265--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Koufaris, M., and Hampton-Sosa, W. "The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers," Information & Management (41:3) 2004, pp 377--397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Laroche, M., McDougall, G., Bergeron, J., and Yang, Z. "Exploring how intangibility affects perceived risk," Journal of Service Research (6:4) 2004, pp 373--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Laroche, M., Yang, Z., McDougall, G., and Bergeron, J. "Internet versus bricks-and-mortar retailers: An investigation into intangibility and its consequents," Journal of Retailing (81:4) 2005, pp 251--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M.P., and Zhuang, Y. "The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web," Decision Support Systems (29) 2000, pp 269--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Lovelock, C. H. "Classifying services to gain strategic insights," Journal of Marketing (47:3) 1983, pp 9--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Lovelock, C. H. (ed.) The customer experience. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. MacInnes, D. J., and Price, L. L. "The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions," Journal of Consumer Marketing (13:4) 1987, pp 473--491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Malhotra, N., Kim, S., and Agarwal, J. "Internet users' information privacy concerns IUIPC: The construct, the scale, and a causal model," Information Systems Research (15:4) 2004, pp 336--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. March, J. G., and Shapira, Z. "Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking," Management Science (33:11) 1987, pp 1404--1418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Marsh, H. W., and Hocever, D. "Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups," Psychological Bulletin (97:3) 1985, pp 562--582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., and Hau, K. T. "Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction," Psychological Methods (9:3) 2004, pp 275--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Meuter, M., Ostrom, A., Roundtree, R., and Bitner, M. J. "Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters," Journal of Marketing (64:July) 2000, pp 50--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Miller, D., and Foust, J. "Classifying services by tangibility/intangibility of attributes and benefits," Services Marketing Quarterly (24:4) 2003, pp 35--55Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Mitchell, V. W. (1994). 1930 years of perceived risk: Some research issues. Academy of Marketing Science Conference. Nashville, TN: Developments in Marketing Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Mitchell, V. W. "30 years of perceived risk: Some research issues," Academy of Marketing Science Conference) 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Mitchell, V. W. "Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualisations and models," European Journal of Marketing (33:1/2) 1999, pp 163--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Mitchell, V. W., and Greatorex, M. "Risk perception and reduction in the purchase of consumer services," The Service Industries Journal (13:4) 1993, pp 179--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Mitra, K., Reiss, M., and Capella, L. "An examination of perceived risk, information search and behavioral intentions in search, experience and credence services," The Journal of Services Marketing (13:3) 1999, pp 208--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Mittal, B. "Services communications: From mindless tangibilization to meaningful messages," Journal of Services Marketing (16:5) 2002, pp 424--431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Murray, K., and Schlacter, J. "The impact of services versus goods on consumers' assessment of perceived risk and variability," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (18:Winter) 1990, pp 51--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Muthén, B., and Asparouhov, T. "Modeling interactions between latent and observed continuous variables using maximum-likelihood estimation in Mplus," 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Norman, D. A. The design of everyday things Doubleday, New York, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Parasuraman, A., and Grewal, D. "Serving customers and consumers effectively in the twenty-first century: A conceptual framework and overview," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (28:1) 2000, pp 9--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research," Journal of Marketing (49:4) 1985, pp 41--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. "SERVQUAL a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality," Journal of Retailing (64:Winter) 1988, pp 12--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Pavlou, P. "Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce - integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model," International Journal of Electronic Commerce (7:3) 2003, pp 101--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Pavlou, P., and Gefen, D. "Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust," Information Systems Research (15:1) 2004, pp 37--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Peter, J. P., and Tarpey, L. X. "A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies," Journal of Consumer Research (2:1) 1975, pp 29--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Pitt, L., Berthon, P., and Watson, R. T. "Cyberservice: Taming service marketing problems with the world wide web," in: Business Horizons, 1999, pp. 11--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. "Common Method Boases in Behavioral Research: A Acritical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies," in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, pp. 879--903.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Project, P.I.A.L. "Demographics of Internet users," 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Raghunathan, R., and Phamb, M. "All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (79:1) 1999, pp 56--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Rapaille, C. The culture code: An ingenious way to understand why people around the world live and buy as they do Broadway Books, Randon House, Portland, OR, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Sarin, S., Sego, T., and Chanvarasuth, N. "Strategic use of bundling for reducing consumers'perceived risk associated with the purchase of new high-tech products," Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice (11:3) 2003, pp 71--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Satzinger, J. W., and Olfman, L. "User interface consistency across end-user applications: The effects on mental models," Journal of Management Information Systems (14:4) 1998, pp 167--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Segars, A., and Grover, V. "Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis," MIS Quarterly (17:4) 1993, pp 517--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Shimp, T. A., and Bearden, W. O. "Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers' risk perceptions," Journal of Consumer Research (9:1) 1982, pp 38--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Shostack, G. "Breaking free from product marketing," Journal of Marketing (41:April) 1977, pp 73--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Stafford, T. "E-Services," Communications of the ACM (46:6) 2003, pp 27--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Stone, R., and Gronhaug, K. "Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline," European Journal of Marketing (27:2) 1993, pp 39--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Tan, M., and Teo, T. S. H. "Factors Influencing the adoption of Internet Banking," Journal of the Association for Information Systems (1:5) 2000, pp 1--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Tan, S. J. "Strategies for reducing consumers' risk aversion in Internet shopping," Journal of Consumer Marketing (16:2) 1999, pp 163--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Tanaka, J., and Huba, G. "Confirmatory hierarchical factor analysis of psychological distress measures," Journal of personality and social psychology (46:3) 1984, pp 621--635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Teo, T. S. H., and Liu, J. "Consumer trust in e-commerce in the United States, Singapore and China," Omega (35) 2007, pp 22--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Teo, T. S. H., and Yeong, Y. D. "Assessing the customer decision process in the digital marketplace," Omega (31:5) 2003, pp 349--372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Van der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., and Creemers, M. "Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives," European Journal of Information Systems (12:1) 2003, pp 41--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies," Management Science (46:2) 2000, pp 186--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Wells, J. D., Fuerst, W. L., and Palmer, J. W. "Designing consumer interfaces for experiential tasks: an empirical investigation," European Journal of Information Systems (14:3) 2005, pp 273--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Zeithaml, V. A. (ed.) How consumer evaluation processes differ between goods and services. American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Zeithaml, V. A. "Service excellence in electronic channels," Managing Service Quality (12:3) 2002, pp 135--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Zeithaml, V. A., and Bitner, M. Services Marketing, (2 ed.) McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., and Malhotra, A. "Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (30:4) 2002, pp 362--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The intangibility of e-services: effects on perceived risk and acceptance

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader