skip to main content
10.1145/1807167.1807314acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

An automated, yet interactive and portable DB designer

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Tuning tools attempt to configure a database to achieve optimal performance for a given workload. Selecting an optimal set of physical structures is computationally hard since it involves searching a vast space of possible configurations. Commercial DBMSs offer tools that can address this problem. The usefulness of such tools, however, is limited by their dependence on greedy heuristics, the need for a-priori (offline) knowledge of the workload, and lack of an optimal materialization schedule to get the best out of suggested design features. Moreover, the open source DBMSs do not provide any automated tuning tools.

This demonstration introduces a comprehensive physical designer for the PostgreSQL open source DBMS. The tool suggests design features for both offline and online workloads. It provides close to optimal suggestions for indexes for a given workload by modeling the problem as a combinatorial optimization problem and solving it by sophisticated and mature solvers. It also determines the interaction between indexes to suggest an effective materialization strategy for the selected indexes. The tool is interactive as it allows the database administrator (DBA) to suggest a set of candidate features and shows their benefits and interactions visually. For the demonstration we use large real-world scientific datasets and query workloads.

References

  1. S. Agrawal et al. Database Tuning Advisor for Microsoft SQL Server 2005. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. N. Bruno and S. Chaudhuri. An Online Approach to Physical Design Tuning. ICDE'07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Bruno and Surajit Chaudhuri. Automatic physical database tuning: a relaxation-based approach. In Proceedings of the SIGMOD Conference, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Dash, A. Ailamaki. CoPhy: Automated Physical Design with Quality Guarantees. Technical Report CMU-CS-10-109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Finkelstein, M. Schkolnick,P. Tiberio: Physical database design for relational databases. ACM ToDS. 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kao, K., Liao, I. 2009. An index selection method without repeated optimizer estimations. Inf. Sci. 179, 13 (Jun. 09) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Monteiro, J. M., Lifschitz, S. and Brayner, A.: An Architecture for Automated Index Tuning. In V Ph.D. and M.S. SBBD, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Papadomanolakis, A. Ailamaki, AutoPart: Automating Schema Design for Large Scientific Databases Using Data Partitioning, 6th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM'04), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Papadomanolakis, D. Dash, A. Ailamaki. Efficient Use of the Query Optimizer for Automated Physical Design. VLDB 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Performance Tuning using the SQLAccess Advisor. http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/db/10g/pdf/twp_general_perf_tuning_using_sqlaccess_advisor_10gr1_1203.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Schnaitter, S. Abiteboul, T. Milo, and N. Polyzotis. Colt: continuous on-line tuning. In proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD, pages 793--795, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Schnaitter, N. Polyzotis, L. Getoor: Index Interactions in Physical Design Tuning: Modeling, Analysis, and Applications. PVLDB 2(1): 1234--1245 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sloan Digital Sky Survey, http://www.sdss.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. C. Zilio, J. Rao, et al. DB2 Design Advisor: Integrated Automatic Physical Data-base Design. VLDB'04. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An automated, yet interactive and portable DB designer

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMOD '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data
      June 2010
      1286 pages
      ISBN:9781450300322
      DOI:10.1145/1807167

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 June 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • demonstration

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader