skip to main content
10.1145/1821748.1821766acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting quality of experience in multimedia streaming

Published:14 December 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Measuring and predicting the user's Quality of Experience (QoE) of a multimedia stream is the first step towards improving and optimizing the provision of mobile streaming services. This enables us to better understand how Quality of Service (QoS) parameters affect service quality, as it is actually perceived by the end user. Over the last years this goal has been pursued by means of subjective tests and through the analysis of the user's feedback. Existing statistical techniques have lead to poor accuracy (order of 70%) and inability to evolve prediction models with the system's dynamics. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for building accurate and adaptive QoE prediction models using Machine Learning classification algorithms, trained on subjective test data. These models can be used for real-time prediction of QoE and can be efficiently integrated into online learning systems that can adapt the models according to changes in the environment. Providing high accuracy of above 90%, the classification algorithms become an indispensible component of a mobile multimedia QoE management system.

References

  1. F. Agboma and A. Liotta, "Addressing user expectations in mobile content delivery," Mobile Information Systems, vol. 3, Jan. 2007, pp. 153--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. F. Agboma and A. Liotta, "QoE-aware QoS management," Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, Linz, Austria: ACM, 2008, pp. 111--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Takahashi, D. Hands, and V. Barriac, "Standardization activities in the ITU for a QoE assessment of IPTV," Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 46, 2008, pp. 78--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Winkler, "Video Quality and Beyond."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Winkler, Digital video quality: vision models and metrics, Chichester West Sussex; Hoboken NJ: J. Wiley & Sons, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Siller and J. Woods, "QoS arbitration for improving the QoE in multimedia transmission," Visual Information Engineering, 2003. VIE 2003. International Conference on, 2003, pp. 238--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. T. Fechner, E. G. Boring, H. E. Adler, and D. H. Howes, Elements of psychophysics / Translated by Helmut E. Adler; Edited by David H. Howes {and} Edwin G. Boring; with an introd. by Edwin G. Boring, New York:: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. W. R. Klecka, Discriminant analysis, SAGE, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. Agboma, "Quality of Experience Management in Mobile Content Delivery Systems," Department of Computing and Electronic Systems, University of Essex, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. V. Vapnik, Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data: Springer Series in Statistics (Springer Series in Statistics), Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. C. Platt, "Sequential Minimal Optimization: A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines," 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. R. Quinlan, C4.5, Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. R. Quinlan, "Learning efficient classification procedures and their application to chess end games," Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach, vol. 1, 1983, pp. 463--482.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. "Weka 3 - Data Mining with Open Source Machine Learning Software in Java."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Kuncheva, Combining pattern classifiers: methods and algorithms, Hoboken NJ: J. Wiley, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Kohavi, "A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection," IJCAI, 1995, pp. 1137--1145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Predicting quality of experience in multimedia streaming

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MoMM '09: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia
          December 2009
          663 pages
          ISBN:9781605586595
          DOI:10.1145/1821748

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 December 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader