skip to main content
10.1145/1822258.1822291acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswikisymConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Wiki trust metrics based on phrasal analysis

Published:08 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wiki users receive very little guidance on the trustworthiness of the information they find. It is difficult for them to determine how long the text in a page has existed, or who originally authored the text. It is also difficult to assess the reliability of authors contributing to a wiki page. In this paper, we create a set of trust indicators and metrics derived from phrasal analysis of the article revision history. These metrics include author attribution, author reputation, expertise ratings, article evolution, and text trustworthiness. We also propose a new technique for collecting and maintaining explicit article ratings across multiple revisions.

References

  1. Adler, B. T. and de Alfaro, L. 2007. A Content-Driven Reputation System for the Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 16th International World Wide Web Conference, 261--270, Banff, Canada. ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Broder, A., Glassman, S., Manasse, M. and Zweig, G. 1997. Syntactic Clustering of the Web. In Proceedings of the 6th International Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brin, S., Davis, J. and García-Molina, H. 1995. Copy detection mechanisms for digital documents. In Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD international Conference on Management of Data (San Jose, California, United States, May 22--25, 1995). M. Carey and D. Schneider, Eds. SIGMOD '95. ACM, New York, NY, 398--409. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chesney, T. 1006. An empirical examination of Wikipedias credibility. First Monday, 11(11), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chim, H. and Deng, X. 2007. A new suffix tree similarity measure for document clustering. In Proceedings of the 16th international Conference on World Wide Web (Banff, Alberta, Canada, May 08--12, 2007). WWW '07. ACM, New York, NY, 121--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cormode, G., and Muthukrishnan, S. 2007. The string edit distance matching problem with moves. ACM Trans. on Algorithms. 3, 1 (Feb. 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Greenwood, M. 1926. The "errors of sampling" of the survivorship tables. Appendix 1. In: Reports on public health and medical subjects. No. 33. London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hao, T., Lu, Z., Wang, S., Zou, T., Gu, S., and Wenyin, L. 2008. Categorizing and ranking search engine's results by semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the 2nd international Conference on Ubiquitous information Management and Communication (Suwon, Korea, January 31 - February 01, 2008). ICUIMC '08. ACM, New York, NY, 284--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kaplan, E. L. and Meier, P. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations, J Am Stat Assoc 53(282), 457--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Levenshtein, V. I. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, Vol. 10, p. 707.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Salton, G. and Buckley, C. 1988. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 24, 5 (Aug. 1988), 513--523. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Schiffman. S. S., Reynolds, M. L., and Young. F. W. 1981. Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling. Academic Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M. and Dave, K. 2004. Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualization. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 575--582 (April, 2004), Vienna, Austria. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Wilkinson, D. M. and Huberman, B. A. 2007. Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia. WikiSym '07. October 2007, Montreal, Canada. ACM. arXiv:cs/070214v1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Chi, E., Chi, H. Suh, B. and Kittur, A. 2008. Providing social transparency through visualizations in Wikipedia. Social Data Analysis Workshop, April, 2008, Florence, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fetterly, D., Manasse, M., Nojork, M. 2005. Detecting phrase-level duplication on the World Wide Web. SIGIR '05, Salvador, Brazil (Aug. 2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Wiki trust metrics based on phrasal analysis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WikiSym '08: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wikis
          September 2008
          219 pages
          ISBN:9781605581286
          DOI:10.1145/1822258

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 September 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate69of145submissions,48%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader