skip to main content
10.1145/1835804.1835906acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling relational events via latent classes

Published:25 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many social networks can be characterized by a sequence of dyadic interactions between individuals. Techniques for analyzing such events are of increasing interest. In this paper, we describe a generative model for dyadic events, where each event arises from one of C latent classes, and the properties of the event (sender, recipient, and type) are chosen from distributions over these entities conditioned on the chosen class. We present two algorithms for inference in this model: an expectation-maximization algorithm as well as a Markov chain Monte Carlo procedure based on collapsed Gibbs sampling. To analyze the model's predictive accuracy, the algorithms are applied to multiple real-world data sets involving email communication, international political events, and animal behavior data.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

kdd2010_dubois_mrel_01.mov

mov

125.4 MB

References

  1. E. M. Airoldi, D. M. Blei, S. E. Fienberg, and E. P. Xing. Mixed membership stochastic blockmodels. Journal of Machine Learning Research, (September):1981--2014, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Anderson, S. Wasserman, and K. Faust. Building stochastic blockmodels. Social Networks, 14(1-2):137--161, June 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. C. Appleby. Competition in a red deer stag social group: rank, age and relatedness of opponents. Animal Behavior, 31:913--918, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. U. Brandes, J. Lerner, and T. a.B. Snijders. Networks evolving step by step: statistical analysis of dyadic event data. 2009 International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, pages 200--205, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Butts. A relational event model for social action. Sociological Methodology, 38(1):155--20, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Chang and D. Blei. Relational topic models for document networks. Proc. of Conf. on AI and Statistics (AISTATS'09), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J.-P. Eckmann, E. Moses, and D. Sergi. Entropy of dialogues creates coherent structures in e-mail traffic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(40):14333-7, October 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. E. Fienberg and S. S. Wasserman. Categorical data analysis of single sociometric relations. Sociological Methodology, 12:156--192, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. Geisser and W. F. Eddy. A predictive approach to model selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(365):153, March 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. M. Goodreau, J. A. Kitts, and M. Morris. Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography, 46:103--125, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T. L. Griffiths and M. Steyvers. Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101 Suppl:5228--35, April 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. D. Hoff. Multiplicative latent factor models for description and prediction of social networks. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, October 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. W. Holland, K. B. Laskey, and S. Leinhardt. Stochastic blockmodels: first steps. Social Networks, 5:109--137, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. C. Kemp, J. Tenenbaum, T. Griffiths, T. Yamada, and N. Ueda. Learning systems of concepts with an infinite relational model. Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. King,W Lowe.An automated information extraction tool for international conflict data with performance as good as human coders: A rare events evaluation design. International Organization, 57:617--642, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. G. Kossinets. Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks, 28:247--268, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. Kurihara, Y. Kameya, and T. Sato. A Frequency-based stochastic blockmodel. Workshop on Information-Based InductionSciences, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Microscopic evolution of social networks. Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. Nowicki and T. A. B. Snijders. Estimation and prediction of stochastic blockstructures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(455):1077--1087, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. Rogers, A. Klami, J. Sinkkonen, M. Girolami, and S. Kaski. Infinite factorization of multiple non-parametric views. Machine Learning, 79(1-2):201--226, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Ross. Introduction to Probability Models. Academic Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Shafiei and H. Chipman. Mixed-membership stochastic block-models for transactional data. Workshop on Analyzing Networks and Learning with Graphs (NIPS 2009), pages 1--8, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Sinkkonen, J. Aukia, S. Kaski, C. Rudin, R. Schapire, and I. Daubechies. Component models for large networks. ArXiv e-prints. arXiv:0803.1628., page 11--15, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Sinkkonen, J. Aukia, S. Kaski. Infinite mixtures for multi-relational categorical data. 6th International Workshop on Mining and Learning with Graphs, Helsinki, Finland, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. T. A. B. Snijders and K. Nowicki. Estimation and prediction for stochastic blockmodels for graphs with latent block structure. Journal of Classification, 14(1):75--100, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Y. Wang and G. Wong. Stochastic blockmodels for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(397):8--19, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '10: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
    July 2010
    1240 pages
    ISBN:9781450300551
    DOI:10.1145/1835804

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 July 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

    Upcoming Conference

    KDD '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader