Richard T. Watson
- 1 Attewell, P., Rule, J. Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know Commun. ACM 27, 12 (DEC. 1984), 1184-1191. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2 Boyacigiller, N., Adler, The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Manag. Rev. 16, 2 (1991), 262-290Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3 Bunke, H.C. Lessons from Singapore. Business Horizons 32, 3, (1989) 2-10Google ScholarCross Ref
- 4 Chok Tone: Time to get back to kconsenusus building task., Straits Time (July 1988) 464-465.Google Scholar
- 5 Deal, T.E., Kennedyh, AA Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals fof corporate life. Addison-Wesley Reading, Mass.,m 1982.Google Scholar
- 6 Dennis. A.R. Nunamker, J.F., Vogel, D.R. A comparison of laboratory experiments and filed studies in the study of electronic meeting systemsj. Manag. Inf. Syst. J. (1991), 107-135 Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7 DeSanctis. G., Gallupe, R.B. Afourndation for the study of group decision support systems. Manag. Scie. 33. 5 (1987) 589-609 Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8 DeSanctis, G., Sambamurthy, V., Watson. R.T./ Computer-supported meetings: Building a Research environment. Large Scale Systems 13 (1987) 43-59.Google Scholar
- 9 Gallupe. B., DeSanctis, G., Dickson, G.W. cOMPUTER-based support for group problem finding: An experimental investigation mis Q. 12 2 (1988), 277-296. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 Garreau, J. The Nine Nations of North America. Avon, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
- 11 Haire, M., Ghiselli, E., Proter. L. Managerial Thinking: An Internaitonal Study. Wiley, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
- 12 Hofstede. G.,Culture's consequencs internation differences in work-related values. Sage Beverly Hillss CA, 1980Google Scholar
- 13 Hofstede, G., Bond, MH. The Confucins connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics 16,4 19885-12Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14 Maslow. A.H. Motivation and Personality. Harper and Row, New York, k1954Google Scholar
- 15 McGrath, J-E. Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984Google Scholar
- 16 Nath R. R.egionaI culture.,entrepre= neurship and high technology development in India. In weiss. J.W., RE- gional cultures, Mangerial Behavior and Entrepreneuship Quorum, New yorkmj, 1988,m 119-140Google Scholar
- 17 Poole, M.S. DeSancitis. G. Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In steinfield, kC., fulk J., Eds., Orgazzations and Communication Technology. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1990 173-193Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18 Poole, M.S. Siebold, D.R.S McPhee, R.D. Group decision-making as a} structurational process. Quartelryu j. of speech, 71 (1985) 74-102Google Scholar
- 19 Sharp, L. Steel axes for stone-age Australian Human Organization. 11 (1952) 17-22Google ScholarCross Ref
- 20 Spillman, B., Spillman. R., Bezdek J. a Fuzzy anlaysis of consensus in small groups In Wang, pp., chang s.k. ed. Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Application to policy Analysis and INformation Systems Plenum New York 1980, 291- 308Google Scholar
- 21 Stefik, M. et al. Beyond the chalkboard: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving meetings. commun. ACM 30, 1 (Jan.1987) 32- 47 Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22 Trip, R.T. The International Thesaurs of Quotations. Penguin, Harmondworth, UK, 1976.Google Scholar
- 23 Turoff. M. Hiltz, S.R. Computer support for group versus individual decisions. IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-30 (1982) 82-90Google Scholar
- 24 Watson, R.T. De Sanctis, G., Poole, M.S. Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unin tended conswquence MISQ 12,3 (1988), 463-480 Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25 Weiss J.W. Reginal Cultures, Managerial Behavior and kEntrepreneurship Quorum, New York./ 1988.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Culture: a fourth dimension of group support systems
Comments