skip to main content
10.1145/1950365.1950390acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesasplosConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic knobs for responsive power-aware computing

Published:05 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present PowerDial, a system for dynamically adapting application behavior to execute successfully in the face of load and power fluctuations. PowerDial transforms static configuration parameters into dynamic knobs that the PowerDial control system can manipulate to dynamically trade off the accuracy of the computation in return for reductions in the computational resources that the application requires to produce its results. These reductions translate directly into performance improvements and power savings.

Our experimental results show that PowerDial can enable our benchmark applications to execute responsively in the face of power caps that would otherwise significantly impair responsiveness. They also show that PowerDial can significantly reduce the number of machines required to service intermittent load spikes, enabling reductions in power and capital costs.

References

  1. Intel Xeon Processor. http://www.intel.com/technology/Xeon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Intel Atom Processor. http://www.intel.com/technology/atom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wattsup .net meter. http://www.wattsupmeters.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Xiph.org. http://xiph.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. H. Albonesi, R. Balasubramonian, S. G. Dropsho, S. Dwarkadas, E. G. Friedman, M. C. Huang, V. Kursun, G. Magklis, M. L. Scott, G. Semeraro, P. Bose, A. Buyuktosunoglu, P. W. Cook, and S. E. Schuster. Dynamically tuning processor resources with adaptive processing. Computer, 36:49--58, December 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Ansel, C. Chan, Y. L. Wong, M. Olszewski, Q. Zhao, A. Edelman, and S. Amarasinghe. Petabricks: A language and compiler for algorithmic choice. In ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, Dublin, Ireland, June 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. Baek and T. Chilimbi. Green: A framework for supporting energy-conscious programming using controlled approximation. In ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, June 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Barroso and U. Holzle. The case for energy-proportional computing. COMPUTER-IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY, 40(12):33, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Bienia, S. Kumar, J. P. Singh, and K. Li. The PARSEC benchmark suite: Characterization and architectural implications. In PACT-2008: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, October 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Carbin and M. Rinard. Automatically Identifying Critical Input Regions and Code in Applications. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L. N. Chakrapani, B. E. S. Akgul, S. Cheemalavagu, P. Korkmaz, K. V. Palem, and B. Seshasayee. Ultra-efficient (embedded) soc architectures based on probabilistic cmos (pcmos) technology. In Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe, DATE, pages 1110--1115, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. N. Chakrapani, K. K. Muntimadugu, A. Lingamneni, J. George, and K. V. Palem. Highly energy and performance efficient embedded computing through approximately correct arithmetic: a mathematical foundation and preliminary experimental validation. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Compilers, architectures and synthesis for embedded systems, CASES, pages 187--196, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Chang and V. Karamcheti. Automatic configuration and run-time adaptation of distributed applications. In Proceedings of the International ACM Symposium on High Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing, HPDC, pages 11--20, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Deutscher and I. Reid. Articulated body motion capture by stochastic search. International Journal of Computer Vision, 61(2):185--205, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Flinn and M. Satyanarayanan. Energy-aware adaptation for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, page 63. ACM, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Frigo and S. G. Johnson. FFTW: An adaptive software architecture for the FFT. In Proc. 1998 IEEE Intl. Conf. Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, volume 3, pages 1381--1384. IEEE, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Gandhi, M. Harchol-Balter, R. Das, C. Lefurgy, and J. Kephart. Power capping via forced idleness. In Workshop on Energy-Efficient Design, June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. Ganesh, T. Leek, and M. Rinard. Taint-based directed whitebox fuzzing. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 474--484. IEEE Computer Society, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. George, B. Marr, B. E. S. Akgul, and K. V. Palem. Probabilistic arithmetic and energy efficient embedded signal processing. In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Compilers, architecture and synthesis for embedded systems, CASES, pages 158--168, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Goel, D. Steere, C. Pu, and J. Walpole. Swift: A feedback control and dynamic reconfiguration toolkit. In 2nd USENIX Windows NT Symposium, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H.264 reference implementation. http://iphome.hhi.de/suehring/tml/download/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. L. Hellerstein, Y. Diao, S. Parekh, and D. M. Tilbury. Feedback Control of Computing Systems. John Wiley & Sons, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. H. Hoffmann, J. Eastep, M. D. Santambrogio, J. E. Miller, and A. Agarwal. Application Heartbeats: A Generic Interface for Specifying Program Performance and Goals in Autonomous Computing Environments. In 7th International Conference on Autonomic Computing, ICAC, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. H. Hoffmann, M. Maggio, M. D. Santambrogio, A. Leva, and A. Agarwal. SEEC: A Framework for Self-aware Computing. Technical Report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2010-049, CSAIL, MIT, October 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. H. Hoffmann, S. Misailovic, S. Sidiroglou, A. Agarwal, and M. Rinard. Using Code Perforation to Improve Performance, Reduce Energy Consumption, and Respond to Failures . Technical Report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2009-042, CSAIL, MIT, September 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. H. Hoffmann, S. Sidiroglou, M. Carbin, S. Misailovic, A. Agarwal, and M. Rinard. Power-Aware Computing with Dynamic Knobs. Technical Report TR-2010-027, CSAIL, MIT, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. C. Karamanolis, M. Karlsson, and X. Zhu. Designing controllable computer systems. In Proceedings of the 10th conference on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, pages 9--15, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2005. USENIX Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. P. J. Keleher, J. K. Hollingsworth, and D. Perkovic. Exposing application alternatives. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, ICDCS, page 384, Washington, DC, USA, 1999. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. C. Lattner and V. Adve. LLVM: A Compilation Framework for Lifelong Program Analysis & Transformation. In Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, CGO, Palo Alto, California, March 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. C. Lefurgy, X. Wang, and M. Ware. Power capping: a prelude to power shifting. Cluster Computing, 11(2):183--195, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. J. Letchner, C. Re, M. Balazinska, and M. Philipose. Approximation trade-offs in markovian stream processing: An empirical study. In 2010 IEEE 26th International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE, pages 936--939, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. B. Li and K. Nahrstedt. A control-based middleware framework for quality-of-service adaptations. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 17(9):1632--1650, September 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. S. Liu, K. P. amd Thomas Moscibroda, and B. G. Zorn. Flicker: Saving Refresh-Power in Mobile Devices through Critical Data Partitioning. Technical Report MSR-TR-2009-138, Microsoft Research, Oct. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. M. Maggio, H. Hoffmann, M. D. Santambrogio, A. Agarwal, and A. Leva. Controlling software applications via resource allocation within the Heartbeats frame work. In 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 3736--3741, December 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. J. Makhoul, F. Kubala, R. Schwartz, and R. Weischedel. Performance measures for information extraction. In Broadcast News Workshop'99 Proceedings, page 249. Morgan Kaufmann Pub, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. D. Meisner, B. Gold, and T. Wenisch. PowerNap: eliminating server idle power. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 44(3):205--216, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. C. Middleton and R. Baeza-Yates. A comparison of open source search engines. Technical report, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Technologies, October 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. S. Misailovic, S. Sidiroglou, H. Hoffmann, and M. Rinard. Quality of service profiling. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE, pages 25--34. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. R. Narayanan, B. Ozisikyilmaz, G. Memik, A. Choudhary, and J. Zambreno. Quantization error and accuracy-performance tradeoffs for embedded data mining workloads. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational Science, ICCS, pages 734--741, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. S. Pelley, D. Meisner, P. Zandevakili, T. Wenisch, and J. Underwood. Power routing: dynamic power provisioning in the data center. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 45(3):231--242, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. R. Ribler, J. Vetter, H. Simitci, and D. Reed. Autopilot: adaptive control of distributed applications. In High Performance Distributed Computing, July 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. M. Rinard. Probabilistic accuracy bounds for fault-tolerant computations that discard tasks. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Supercomputing, pages 324--334. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. M. C. Rinard. Using early phase termination to eliminate load imbalances at barrier synchronization points. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM conference on Object-oriented programming systems and applications, OOPSLA, pages 369--386, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. M. Salehie and L. Tahvildari. Self-adaptive software: Landscape and research challenges. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 4(2):1--42, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. J. Sorber, A. Kostadinov, M. Garber, M. Brennan, M. D. Corner, and E. D. Berger. Eon: a language and runtime system for perpetual systems. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, SenSys, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. P. Stanley-Marbell, D. Dolech, A. Eindhoven, and D. Marculescu. Deviation-Tolerant Computation in Concurrent Failure-Prone Hardware. Technical Report ESR-2008-01, Eindhoven University of Technology, January 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. SWISH++. http://swishplusplus.sourceforge.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. C. Tapus, I. Chung, and J. Hollingsworth. Active harmony: Towards automated performance tuning. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, pages 1--11, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2002. IEEE Computer Society Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA report to congress on server and data center energy efficiency, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. M. Weiser, B. Welch, A. Demers, and S. Shenker. Scheduling for reduced CPU energy. Mobile Computing, pages 449--471, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. R. Whaley and J. Dongarra. Automatically tuned linear algebra software. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing, pages 1--27. IEEE Computer Society, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. x264. http://www.videolan.org/x264.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. J. Xiong, J. Johnson, R. W. Johnson, and D. Padua. SPL: A language and compiler for DSP algorithms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2001 conference on Programming language design and implementation, PLDI, pages 298--308, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. R. Zhang, C. Lu, T. Abdelzaher, and J. Stankovic. Controlware: A middleware architecture for feedback control of software performance. In Proceedings of the 22nd International conference on Distributed Computing Systems. IEEE computer society, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic knobs for responsive power-aware computing

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ASPLOS XVI: Proceedings of the sixteenth international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems
            March 2011
            432 pages
            ISBN:9781450302661
            DOI:10.1145/1950365
            • cover image ACM SIGPLAN Notices
              ACM SIGPLAN Notices  Volume 46, Issue 3
              ASPLOS '11
              March 2011
              407 pages
              ISSN:0362-1340
              EISSN:1558-1160
              DOI:10.1145/1961296
              Issue’s Table of Contents
            • cover image ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News
              ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News  Volume 39, Issue 1
              ASPLOS '11
              March 2011
              407 pages
              ISSN:0163-5964
              DOI:10.1145/1961295
              Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 5 March 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate535of2,713submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader