skip to main content
10.1145/2063576.2063981acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Efficient query rewrite for structured web queries

Published:24 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Web search engines incorporate results from structured data sources to answer semantically rich user queries, i.e. Samsung 50 inch led tv can be answered from a table of television data. However, users are not domain experts and quite often enter values that do not match precisely the underlying data, so a literal execution will return zero results. A search engine would prefer to return at least a minimum number of results as close to the original query as possible while providing a time-bound execution guarantee. In this paper, we formalize these requirements, show the problem is NP-Hard and present approximation algorithms that produce rewrites that work in practice. We empirically validate our algorithms on large-scale data from a major search engine.

References

  1. Msn shopping xml api: Specs. http://shopping.msn.com/xml/v1/getspecs.aspx?itemid=1202956773.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Msn shopping xml api: Televisions. http://shopping.msn.com/xml/v1/getresults.aspx?bcatid=4724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Bergman. The deep web: Surfacing hidden value. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 7(1), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. J. Cafarella, A. Y. Halevy, D. Z. Wang, E. W. 0002, and Y. Zhang. Webtables: exploring the power of tables on the web. PVLDB, 1(1):538--549, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Fontoura, V. Josifovski, R. Kumar, C. Olston, A. Tomkins, and S. Vassilvitskii. Relaxation in text search using taxonomies. PVLDB, 1(1):672--683, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Koudas, C. Li, A. K. H. Tung, and R. Vernica. Relaxing join and selection queries. In VLDB, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Panigrahi and S. Gollapudi. Result enrichment in commerce search using browse trails. In WSDM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. Roussopoulos, S. Kelley, and F. Vincent. Nearest neighbor queries. In Proc. SIGMOD Conf., June 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Sarkas, S. Paparizos, and P. Tsaparas. Structured annotations of web queries. In SIGMOD Conf., 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient query rewrite for structured web queries

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
          October 2011
          2712 pages
          ISBN:9781450307178
          DOI:10.1145/2063576

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 October 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader