skip to main content
10.1145/2157689.2157811acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modelling empathic behaviour in a robotic game companion for children: an ethnographic study in real-world settings

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The idea of autonomous social robots capable of assisting us in our daily lives is becoming more real every day. However, there are still many open issues regarding the social capabilities that those robots should have in order to make daily interactions with humans more natural. For example, the role of affective interactions is still unclear. This paper presents an ethnographic study conducted in an elementary school where 40 children interacted with a social robot capable of recognising and responding empathically to some of the children's affective states. The findings suggest that the robot's empathic behaviour affected positively how children perceived the robot. However, the empathic behaviours should be selected carefully, under the risk of having the opposite effect. The target application scenario and the particular preferences of children seem to influence the degree of empathy that social robots should be endowed with.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

hri223.mp4

mp4

13.7 MB

References

  1. C. Anderson and D. Keltner. The role of empathy in the formation and maintenance of social bonds. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 25(1):21--22, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Auer, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and P. Fischer. Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Machine learning, 47(2):235--256, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Borgers, E. de Leeuw, and J. Hox. Children as respondents in survey research: Cognitive development and response quality. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 66(1):60, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C. Breazeal. Role of expressive behaviour for robots that learn from people. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535):3527--3538, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Castellano, I. Leite, A. Pereira, C. Martinho, A. Paiva, and P. McOwan. It's all in the game: Towards an affect sensitive and context aware game companion. In Proceedings of ACII 2009, pages 29--36. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. G. Castellano, I. Leite, A. Pereira, C. Martinho, A. Paiva, and P. W. McOwan. Inter-ACT: An affective and contextually rich multimodal video corpus for studying interaction with robots. In Proc. of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 1031--1034. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2:27:1--27:27, 2011. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/ cjlin/libsvm. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Chi. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning sciences, pages 271--315, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. Cooper, P. Brna, and A. Martins. Effective affective in intelligent systems: Building on evidence of empathy in teaching and learning. In A. Paiva, editor, Affective Interactions, volume 1814 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 21--34. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H. Cramer, J. Goddijn, B. Wielinga, and V. Evers. Effects of (in)accurate empathy and situational valence on attitudes towards robots. In ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 141--142. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. A. Denham, J. Mitchell-Copeland, K. Strandberg, S. Auerbach, and K. Blair. Parental contributions to preschoolers' emotional competence: Direct and indirect effects. Motivation and Emotion, 21:65--86, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Forlizzi. How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 129--136. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. Hanna, K. Risden, and K. Alexander. Guidelines for usability testing with children. Interactions, 4(5):9--14, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Hegel, T. Spexard, T. Vogt, G. Horstmann, and B. Wrede. Playing a different imitation game: Interaction with an Empathic Android Robot. In Proc. 2006 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids06), pages 56--61, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Hoffman. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge Univ Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. Kanda, R. Sato, N. Saiwaki, and H. Ishiguro. A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human--robot interaction. Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, 23(5):962--971, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Kozima, M. Michalowski, and C. Nakagawa. A playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. Int J Soc Robot, 1:3--18, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. I. Leite, C. Martinho, A. Pereira, and A. Paiva. As time goes by: Long-term evaluation of social presence in robotic companions. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2009. RO-MAN 2009, pages 669--674. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. I. Leite, S. Mascarenhas, A. Pereira, C. Martinho, R. Prada, and A. Paiva. "why can't we be friends?" an empathic game companion for long-term interaction. In J. Allbeck, N. Badler, T. Bickmore, C. Pelachaud, and A. Safonova, editors, Intelligent Virtual Agents, volume 6356 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 315--321. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. I. Leite, A. Pereira, G. Castellano, S. Mascarenhas, C. Martinho, and A. Paiva. Modelling empathy in social robotic companions. In L. Ardissono and T. Kuflik, editors, UMAP 2011 Workshops. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. I. Leite, A. Pereira, C. Martinho, and A. Paiva. Are emotional robots more fun to play with? In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2008, pages 77 --82, aug. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. B. Mutlu and J. Forlizzi. Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 287--294. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. L. D. Riek, P. C. Paul, and P. Robinson. When my robot smiles at me: Enabling human-robot rapport via real-time head gesture mimicry. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 3(1--2):99--108, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. A. Sabelli, T. Kanda, and N. Hagita. A conversational robot in an elderly care center: an ethnographic study. In ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 37--44. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Saerbeck, T. Schut, C. Bartneck, and M. Janse. Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In Proceedings of CHI 2010, pages 1613--1622. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Sanghvi, G. Castellano, I. Leite, A. Pereira, P. W. McOwan, and A. Paiva. Automatic analysis of affective postures and body motion to detect engagement with a game companion. In ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 305--312. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. K. Scherer. What are emotions? and how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4):695, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. J. Sung, H. Christensen, and R. Grinter. Robots in the wild: understanding long-term use. In ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 45--52. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. D. Veenstra and V. Evers. The development of an online research tool to investigate children's social bonds with robots. Human-Robot Personal Relationships, pages 19--26, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Modelling empathic behaviour in a robotic game companion for children: an ethnographic study in real-world settings

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HRI '12: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction
        March 2012
        518 pages
        ISBN:9781450310635
        DOI:10.1145/2157689

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 March 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader